
|
06-17-2010
|
#1
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Location: | New York |
Posts: | 10,408 |
|
Audio: TMac talks Jenkins on Ben and Skin
TMac talks Mike Jenkins on Ben and Skin
I can't see where Mike Jenkins is mad at TMac. The intent of the article was not in any way meant to take shots at Jenkins. If anything I was more critical of Jenkins for the quote. I agree that it's a case of Jenkins not even reading the article, but just hearing some of his peeps come back to him saying the media was going after him.
But if he did read the TMac article and was still mad then I don't know what to tell him. There are going to be times when the media and the fans take shots at you. Just take it all in and let it motivate you.
|
|
|
06-17-2010
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Sep 2008 |
Posts: | 2,296 |
|
How does Tmac know Jenkins took shots at him? Did he call him out specifically (just to follow the theme of all the hand wringers).
Oh well, Tmac got a radio appearance out of it 
Best Oline for Cowboys:
LT: Free LG: Mankins C: Gurode RG: Holland RT:Young (or an early draft pick)
Hatcher = better overall player than Spears (equal run stopping; better pass rushing)
|
|
|
06-17-2010
|
#3
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Mar 2006 |
Location: | New York |
Posts: | 10,408 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newnationcb
How does Tmac know Jenkins took shots at him? Did he call him out specifically (just to follow the theme of all the hand wringers).
Oh well, Tmac got a radio appearance out of it 
|
I think he can read and he follows the Cowboys so maybe that's where he found out that Jenkins was pissed at him.
He might even be able to text him or call him on the phone.
TMac is all over ESPN radio every week, lol.
You don't leave here all that much do you?
|
|
|
06-18-2010
|
#4
|
|
K9NME
Years Donated 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, TX |
Posts: | 10,274 |
|
Knowing Tmac's track record covering the boys, I am siding with Jenkins.
“Hit them in the mouth, bloody their nose, throw them to the ground and step on their throat!”--Brooking, Pregame Huddle 2009
|
|
|
06-18-2010
|
#5
|
|
Run-loving Dino
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | 1-star thread |
Posts: | 32,047 |
|
Who cares if he gets mad at "T-Mac" for any reason? What difference does it make?
Ivy League
Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
|
|
|
06-18-2010
|
#6
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
The title of Tim McMahon's article about him was...
Jenkins Satisfied After Breakout Season
I am sorry to inform Mr. McMahon that this leaves a negative connotation. Any athlete, not just Mike Jenkins, is going to see a title like that as an attack. "Oh look, he's satisfied. He's not hungry."
Then he further pushes this tone with the now infamous quote.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike Jenkins
I’ve got a Pro Bowl under my belt, so that’s one of the goals I don’t even have to work for,” Jenkins said. “I feel like my job right now is easier, so I don’t have to work as hard. I can just go on and ride that roller-coaster and keep playing.
|
In other words, McMahon is using the quote to come up with the title. He knew exactly what he was doing. The mock shock that the athlete was pissed doesn't fly with me.
For the rest of the article McMahon is trying to explain away the quote itself. As if to say, "look, I'm his interpreter because he's too dumb to know the impact of what he said, but I'm not, look at the title."
I don't blame Jenkins for being mad. I'd be mad as hell too. No matter how McMahon spins it, his article is insinuating that Mike Jenkins is not hungry and is going to rest on his laurels.
|
|
|
06-18-2010
|
#7
|
|
K9NME
Years Donated 2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, TX |
Posts: | 10,274 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
The title of Tim McMahon's article about him was...
Jenkins Satisfied After Breakout Season
I am sorry to inform Mr. McMahon that this leaves a negative connotation. Any athlete, not just Mike Jenkins, is going to see a title like that as an attack. "Oh look, he's satisfied. He's not hungry."
Then he further pushes this tone with the now infamous quote.
In other words, McMahon is using the quote to come up with the title. He knew exactly what he was doing. The mock shock that the athlete was pissed doesn't fly with me.
For the rest of the article McMahon is trying to explain away the quote itself. As if to say, "look, I'm his interpreter because he's too dumb to know the impact of what he said, but I'm not, look at the title."
[View Full Quote]I don't blame Jenkins for being mad. I'd be mad as hell too. No matter how McMahon spins it, his article is insinuating that Mike Jenkins is not hungry and is going to rest on his laurels.
|
Like I said before even listening to timmy trying to weasel out of his trumped up controversy, this frog knows a scorpion no matter how he tries to convince us otherwise.
“Hit them in the mouth, bloody their nose, throw them to the ground and step on their throat!”--Brooking, Pregame Huddle 2009
|
|
|
06-18-2010
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Sep 2008 |
Posts: | 2,296 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by
I think he can read and he follows the Cowboys so maybe that's where he found out that Jenkins was pissed at him.
He might even be able to text him or call him on the phone.
TMac is all over ESPN radio every week, lol.
You don't leave here all that much do you?
|
After telling me what his favorite colors are next you can discuss the aroma of his *** in the trail. Lol.
You are a groupie to Tim Mcmahon? Must suck to be you.
Btw, my point was why does he think Jenkins is mad at him. His article was based on Jenkins blog post in which Jenkins only referred to the media as a whole. Was Tim the only one who ran the quote?
Best Oline for Cowboys:
LT: Free LG: Mankins C: Gurode RG: Holland RT:Young (or an early draft pick)
Hatcher = better overall player than Spears (equal run stopping; better pass rushing)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 AM.
|