Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2004   #1
dirt
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Harrow Ontario C
Posts:
283
Default things to consider about JJones

Interesting note in ESPN article that this was the lowest that a RB has been chosen in many years--indicating that it wasnt a stellar crop. That being said:
!. as a physical runner- Jackson has some mileage--Jones is relatively fresh in running back terms

2.quality RB's seem to be found in any round--a Denver Bronco trend--look at the fourth round last year

3.Jackson may have peaked--what you see now is what you get--Jones may be on the rise

4. Kiper- in his analysis of the second round said that the Cowboys got tremendous value at this point

5. Clayton is the only one that seems to be so negative on the trade down. But, if Baltimore had made the trade, I am betting that the response would be the opposite--indicating foresight and planning

6. Question? will Jacksons physical style give the same results in the NFL as in college or will he be a 3.3 yd per carry - 4-5 year career type that wears out of the league

7. So many teams with RB needs passed over him. I definitely thought the Eagles or Broncos would take him--even the Bucs--all good personnel people

this might be more of an indication of what the running back class was thougth of than anything

We will see in a year or so
dirt is offline  

Old 04-25-2004   #2
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,303
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirt
Interesting note in ESPN article that this was the lowest that a RB has been chosen in many years--indicating that it wasnt a stellar crop. That being said:
!. as a physical runner- Jackson has some mileage--Jones is relatively fresh in running back terms

2.quality RB's seem to be found in any round--a Denver Bronco trend--look at the fourth round last year

3.Jackson may have peaked--what you see now is what you get--Jones may be on the rise

4. Kiper- in his analysis of the second round said that the Cowboys got tremendous value at this point

5. Clayton is the only one that seems to be so negative on the trade down. But, if Baltimore had made the trade, I am betting that the response would be the opposite--indicating foresight and planning

[View Full Quote]
Clayton is such a SF homer his credibility is zip.
MichaelWinicki is online now  
Old 04-25-2004   #3
adbutcher
K9NME
 
adbutcher's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Houston, TX
Posts:
10,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirt
Interesting note in ESPN article that this was the lowest that a RB has been chosen in many years--indicating that it wasnt a stellar crop. That being said:
!. as a physical runner- Jackson has some mileage--Jones is relatively fresh in running back terms

2.quality RB's seem to be found in any round--a Denver Bronco trend--look at the fourth round last year

3.Jackson may have peaked--what you see now is what you get--Jones may be on the rise

4. Kiper- in his analysis of the second round said that the Cowboys got tremendous value at this point

5. Clayton is the only one that seems to be so negative on the trade down. But, if Baltimore had made the trade, I am betting that the response would be the opposite--indicating foresight and planning

[View Full Quote]
Great post Dirt. Although I was initially gleeful that we were about to select Jackson and pretty angry when we didn't, after thinking about it rationally and without emotion, I feel that we made off like a bandit.

Anytime you get more with less is a coup. First of all we get two offensive linemen that are champions and played at a high level. Next we get a running back with good vision, good balance, sub 4.5 speed, and little wear and tear. And lastly we get an additional 1st round pick. Dam, after you think about it there is really nothing we should be complaining about. All our offensive needs have been addressed with upgrades and hopefully we can get some value today on the defensive side of the ball.

Thank God for the Tuna, I know he knows what to do. Fans are very irrational by nature, especially when they get attached to a specific player but ultimately the scouting department and the coaching staff without a doubt knows what’s best for the cowboys. I am truly happy with the draft thus far and I hope this trend continues today.

“Hit them in the mouth, bloody their nose, throw them to the ground and step on their throat!”--Brooking, Pregame Huddle 2009

adbutcher is offline  
Old 04-25-2004   #4
jamez25
Senior Member
 
jamez25's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Texas
Posts:
1,606
Default

Clayton is such a SF homer his credibility is zip.

Berman is a 9'er and Bills brown-noser.

My favorite channel.
jamez25 is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com