Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-04-2005   #1
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default A different slant on the signing of Izell Reese...

Going into the last minicamp, Parcells said he wanted to see where he was at free safety before making any moves... this strongly suggested that he hoped to play the hand he'd already been dealt... in particular, this suggested that he wanted to see if Keith Davis was ready to step up and take the job...

Then, a couple-three days after the minicamp, he goes out and signs Reese... this tells us with some clarity that he was NOT satisfied with the potential exhibited by Davis et al...

Given that, I don't see why some of you are so completely insistent that Keith will win the starting job... I mean, he still might, but if he was such a lock, they wouldn't have signed Reese...

And so, if you concede that it appears that the Cowboys were less than thrilled with their depth chart at FS, how does the signing of Izell look when filtered through that realization??

I repeat, it looks awfully good to me... every bit as good as the Aaron Glenn signing looks... I really liked that one too; every signing can't be a potential future Pro Bowler, some of them are gonna have to be solid role players...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com