Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2005   #1
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default Billy the Kid

Will he cost us games this year?

Win games in the clutch like his epic Giant game?

Is there any competition coming for the job?


Do you feel good or bad about our placekicker?
Nors is offline  

Old 06-10-2005   #2
jksmith269
Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Years Donated
2005, 2008
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
In My own Mind j
Posts:
3,898
Send a message via Yahoo to jksmith269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
Will he cost us games this year?

Win games in the clutch like his epic Giant game?

Is there any competition coming for the job?


Do you feel good or bad about our placekicker?
I'm Willing to give billy another year. I think he will improve his leg strength and be more consistant. and yes there is a rookie from Fresno (I think) going to camp to compete with him.
jksmith269 is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #3
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

I saw him his Rookie year at the Vet. Pregame the kid hits a sweet ball. Very accurate inside 40 - range iffy.


KICKING

Year Team G 1-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50+ Tot Lg Blk Pct XP XPG Pct
2002 Dallas Cowboys 16 0-0 3-3 5-7 4-8 0-1 12-19 48 0 63.2 25-25 25 100.0
2003 Dallas Cowboys 15 0-0 11-11 5-6 4-7 3-5 23-29 52 0 79.3 30-31 30 96.8
2004 Dallas Cowboys 16 1-1 6-6 4-4 9-13 0-2 20-26 49 0 76.9 31-31 31 100.0
TOTAL 47 1-1 20-20 14-17 17-28 3-8 55-74 52 0 74.3 86-87 86 98.9


Thats 21-21 inside 30, 14-17 30-39 yards, 3-8 50+

% = 74.3%
Nors is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #4
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

Good comparison is Matt Stover. Stover was only 72.6% first 3 years but lethal inside 40. Today after a 16 year career - at 83% overall, 138/141 inside 30

Vanderjerk #'s are sic - career 87%

Last edited by Nors : 06-10-2005 at 09:24 PM.
Nors is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #5
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,815
Default

Decent enough place kicker, sucks as a kick off guy however. In other words, nothing special and will be in the top 4 or 5 of least talented positions on our team.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #6
lane
The Chairman
 
lane's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
9,720
Default

all billy needs to worry about is kicking a hell of a lot of extra points.
lane is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #7
Manster68
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Gulfport, MS
Posts:
1,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
Will he cost us games this year?

Win games in the clutch like his epic Giant game?

Is there any competition coming for the job?


Do you feel good or bad about our placekicker?

Any time a team has a kicker who struggles to be consistant on his home turf, with virtually no wind, is a liability in my book.
Manster68 is online now  
Old 06-10-2005   #8
Big D
Senior Member
 
Big D's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Back in Burque
Posts:
2,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big dog cowboy
Decent enough place kicker, sucks as a kick off guy however. In other words, nothing special and will be in the top 4 or 5 of least talented positions on our team.

I agree.. Billy seems to have good leg strength for field goals in practice he needs learn to focus in game situations.

As for kickoffs we need to get anyone in that can get the ball in the endzone consistently. I hate when the opposing team is GIVEN 10-20 of BPs 'hidden yards' due to a poor kickoff.
Big D is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #9
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big D
I agree.. Billy seems to have good leg strength for field goals in practice he needs learn to focus in game situations.

As for kickoffs we need to get anyone in that can get the ball in the endzone consistently. I hate when the opposing team is GIVEN 10-20 of BPs 'hidden yards' due to a poor kickoff.
Dallas was 9th in the league last year in kick return average coverage. I wonder net if he's really costing us 10-20 yards. We also gave up no KR TD's.
Hangtime versus distance is a coverage guys friend sometimes.

But point taken on leg strength -
Nors is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #10
jksmith269
Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Years Donated
2005, 2008
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
In My own Mind j
Posts:
3,898
Send a message via Yahoo to jksmith269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big D
I agree.. Billy seems to have good leg strength for field goals in practice he needs learn to focus in game situations.

As for kickoffs we need to get anyone in that can get the ball in the endzone consistently. I hate when the opposing team is GIVEN 10-20 of BPs 'hidden yards' due to a poor kickoff.
Funny we gave up the least number of yards per return in the NFL and say what you want but Billy averaged 61.7 yards per kick off and average return of 17.5

Only 2 teams averaged kickoffs over 65 yards Zona and Jax zona gave up 22.1 per return and Jax gave up 19.9

Off all the teams who averaged longer kick offs than Billy (excluding zona and Jax) they averaged 1.83 yards per kick longer than billy but gave up on average 5.23 yards more in returns than Dallas. and that is 14 teams

of those 14 teams
4 averaged 64.1-64.9 per kickoff
7 averaged 63.0-63.8
3 averaged 62.1-62.9
Billy 61.7


Billy does fine on kickoffs knock him for kicks over 40 but not on kickoffs he may not get many TB's but you cant cause a fumble on a TB either.
jksmith269 is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #11
jksmith269
Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Years Donated
2005, 2008
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
In My own Mind j
Posts:
3,898
Send a message via Yahoo to jksmith269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
Dallas was 9th in the league last year in kick return average coverage. I wonder net if he's really costing us 10-20 yards. We also gave up no KR TD's.
Hangtime versus distance is a coverage guys friend sometimes.

But point taken on leg strength -
Wrong nors we were first with 17.5 per return not 9th
jksmith269 is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #12
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

Source - I pulled it quick off NFL.Com

I could be wrong.
Nors is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #13
jksmith269
Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Years Donated
2005, 2008
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
In My own Mind j
Posts:
3,898
Send a message via Yahoo to jksmith269
Default

http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NF...1=9&_1:col_2=9
jksmith269 is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #14
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
Dallas was 9th in the league last year in kick return average coverage.

Hangtime versus distance is a coverage guys friend sometimes.
I would rather have a kickoff go 10 yards further and give up 5 extra return yards. So your kick return average takes a hit but the opposing offense has a longer field to work with.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline  
Old 06-10-2005   #15
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jksmith269
http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NF...1=4&_1:col_2=9

Thanks - I sorted wrong as defensive stats. We indeed had lowest return average. On a net basis Cundiff is near the top of the league - that is what counts - Net.
Nors is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com