Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2005 Archives > 2005 Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 06-20-2005   #31
Zaxor
Virtus Mille Scuta
 
Zaxor's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Weil der Stadt,
Posts:
8,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk
Oh, sorry. Let me try again.

YES! This means Long will be the #3 next year because Henson will beat out Bledsoe for the starting job (that is, if stubborn old BP will actually play him instead of sticking with "his guys"). Bledsoe is obviously washed up, so I can't see him in Dallas beyond one year. Even though Henson hasn't played football, he has so much "upside" and "potential" that BP can't keep him off the field.

Romo will be a good #2 because he has "moxie" which obviously is a good trait to have when looking for a QB. I heard they measured his "moxie quotient" at the combine and it was off the charts which makes it even more incredible that he went undrafted.

This will be much better than when old man Vinny, dopehead QuINTcy and Karoake Hutch were all playing.

How was that? Did I get sufficient QB bashing from all angles? Will there be enough there to incite someone?
a literary masterpiece Junk and I agree with everything you said
Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind. These passions, like great winds, have blown me hither and thither, in a wayward course, over a great ocean of anguish, reaching to the very verge of despair....Bertrand Russell
Zaxor is offline  
Old 06-20-2005   #32
kartr
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
3,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by junk
Oh, sorry. Let me try again.

YES! This means Long will be the #3 next year because Henson will beat out Bledsoe for the starting job (that is, if stubborn old BP will actually play him instead of sticking with "his guys"). Bledsoe is obviously washed up, so I can't see him in Dallas beyond one year. Even though Henson hasn't played football, he has so much "upside" and "potential" that BP can't keep him off the field.

Romo will be a good #2 because he has "moxie" which obviously is a good trait to have when looking for a QB. I heard they measured his "moxie quotient" at the combine and it was off the charts which makes it even more incredible that he went undrafted.

This will be much better than when old man Vinny, dopehead QuINTcy and Karoake Hutch were all playing.

How was that? Did I get sufficient QB bashing from all angles? Will there be enough there to incite someone?

Parcell's has said that potential means nothing and upside means you haven't done anything yet, including beat out an udfa qb in Romo. Is this the kind of retort you were looking for?
kartr is offline  
Old 06-20-2005   #33
kartr
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
3,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NumOneQB
I agree on Leinert. He's peaked IMO and has nowhere to go but down. I think Omar Jacobs will be the 1st QB drafted next year. I would love to see Dallas take a shot at him if our QB play does not significantly improve.
Now you're talking, but I still think that Leinhart will go first. Most probably Detroit will trade their 1st,Harrington and Rogers to get him so that he can be reunited with Mike Williams. I suspect Jacobs could be as good or better than Roethlisberger. He definitely fits the direction the NFL is going and in my opinion will be a better pro than Leinhart.
kartr is offline  
Old 06-20-2005   #34
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kartr
Parcell's has said that potential means nothing and upside means you haven't done anything yet, including beat out an udfa qb in Romo. Is this the kind of retort you were looking for?
Well, if you read the whole thread, you would see that this was meant as a totally sarcastic response to Zaxor. I thought I took great measures to mock every Cowboys QB including my comments about Henson being in quotes and making the comment about BP playing his guys. I tried to encapsulate all the cliches I could remember about all the QBs.

It is interesting that in all of that you picked out the Henson comments to reply to though.

Hey Zaxor, somebody bit. Here's your chance.
junk is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com