Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2011   #16
ThreeandOut
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
San Antonio
Posts:
1,496
Default

Bunting came out with his top 5 QB's yesterday in this order...

1) Luck
2) Tannehill
3) Barkley
4) RG3
5) Jones

Unless they're willing to move on from Romo after 2012, I don't see Dallas taking a QB in round 1. Now if one of the QB's above were to fall to them in round 2, then they would probably jump at that opportunity.

IMO, Tannehill would be the most likely to fall to them in round 2. Teams needing a QB to step and play immediately might be scared to take him due to his inexperience. But Dallas would be a good situation for him because they don't need an immediate starter. It would be similar to Tyron Smith where teams didn't look at him earlier because he hadn't played LT. But that wasn't an issue with Dallas since they didn't have an immediate need at LT.
ThreeandOut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #17
casmith07
Spider 2 Y-Banana
 
casmith07's Avatar
Years Donated
2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
NOVA
Posts:
23,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
I don't believe he is. People are getting enamored with his video game numbers, but I see a good college QB with a wide receivers body, a questionable NFL arm (his and Kellen Moore's arm are about the same), playing in a spread college offense.

For whatever reason I've seen a few folks mentioning Cam Newton's name when talking about RG3, but I don't see why. Cam had a very good arm, a terrific frame with athleticism and a good delivery to work with going into the pros. He also performed at a high level against better competition week-in, week-out in the SEC throughout his career.

I could go through a list longer than Schindler's of great college QBs with gaudy numbers who's game didn't translate to the NFL.
So you see Sam Bradford.
mas cerveza por favor
casmith07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #18
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by casmith07 View Post
So you see Sam Bradford.
Lol, so you believe Sam Bradford = RG3?

If that's not what you're saying, I don't understand your reference.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #19
realtick
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
6,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack View Post
You are out of your mind if you don't think Barkley is a 1st round talent.

I agree with you on RG3..however, teams are reaching for QBs..look at all the bums who went early in this last draft..somebody will reach on Rg3-in the 1st.
Thanks.

Where Barkley goes in the draft obviously is going to be dictated on how the season shapes up. Players can be drafted higher due to demand on a position. So for me, saying Matt Barkley is gauranteed 1st rounder doesn't say much to me.

I'm looking at him as a QB prospect.

I'm not overly enamored with him, although he is having a great start to this season. He's not in Andrew Luck's echelon (nobody this year is). I think Barkley compares very similiar to Jimmy Clausen (2nd rounder '10), Christian Ponder (1st round '11), and Andy Dalton (3rd round '11) in terms of the type of prospect he is.
realtick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #20
GloryDaysRBack
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
Thanks.

Where Barkley goes in the draft obviously is going to be dictated on how the season shapes up. Players can be drafted higher due to demand on a position. So for me, saying Matt Barkley is gauranteed 1st rounder doesn't say much to me.

I'm looking at him as a QB prospect.

I'm not overly enamored with him, although he is having a great start to this season. He's not in Andrew Luck's echelon (nobody this year is). I think Barkley compares very similiar to Jimmy Clausen (2nd rounder '10), Christian Ponder (1st round '11), and Andy Dalton (3rd round '11) in terms of the type of prospect he is.
THis is where I disagree. I think as a prospect Barkley is a 1st rounder. Kid has it all. He just isn't a "sexy" prospect for whatever reason.
GloryDaysRBack is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #21
TheFinisher
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2010
Posts:
1,744
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick View Post
Lol, so you believe Sam Bradford = RG3?

If that's not what you're saying, I don't understand your reference.
I think you can make a pretty good argument that RG3>Bradford.
TheFinisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #22
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,958
Default

If a QB that we had rated very highly (higher than what we were picking) fell to us, I think we should consider it. The value must be there though.
Some of the names on that list will not go in the 1st...but I see your point, nevertheless.

My choice would be to absolutely not burn a 1st rounder on a QB--not yet anyway. But value is the key...kind of like GB nabbing Rogers late in Rd1.
DFWJC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011   #23
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,357
Default

I'd draft Landry Jones or Griffin in the first. Would not draft Barkley or Tanneyhill in the first.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com