Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-03-2012   #1
newlander
Senior Member
 
newlander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2006
Posts:
7,658
Default I say we sign GRUBBS at Guard....then draft...

Cox for the dline. IF at all possible we should also sign Carr at CB....think of that.......FA: Grubbs, Carr, Robinson...........draft: Cox, Jones(center) who COULD be had LATER in the 2nd round which would net us another pick, and the last 5 rounds concentrate on safety, ILB, and best available olinemen and dlinemen.......thoughts? The 5 players listed would be starters and wouldn't ruin our cap like Nicks would. They would have instant impact: then concentrate on depth in rounds 3-7......just a thought I haven't seen so far on the board.

Last edited by newlander : 03-03-2012 at 07:57 PM.
newlander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-03-2012   #2
reddyuta
Senior Member
 
reddyuta's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2008
Location:
valley ranch
Posts:
3,924
Default

Grubbs is not going to be cheap either.I still have my doubts about interest in any FA guards,we might go after one of the top center FAs though.
reddyuta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #3
newlander
Senior Member
 
newlander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2006
Posts:
7,658
Default true grubbs won't come CHEAP...

Quote:
Originally Posted by reddyuta View Post
Grubbs is not going to be cheap either.I still have my doubts about interest in any FA guards,we might go after one of the top center FAs though.

but he'll be alot less than Nicks. I like a proven commodity like Grubbs, which would free us up to draft defensive line in the first round. Plus, free agency is a certainly deeper and better for oline than for dline.
newlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #4
durrrr
Senior Member
 
durrrr's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2010
Posts:
515
Default

Who plays OLB?
durrrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #5
marchetta
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
2,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newlander View Post
Cox for the dline. IF at all possible we should also sign Carr at CB....think of that.......FA: Grubbs, Carr, Robinson...........draft: Cox, Jones(center) who COULD be had LATER in the 2nd round which would net us another pick, and the last 5 rounds concentrate on safety, ILB, and best available olinemen and dlinemen.......thoughts? The 5 players listed would be starters and wouldn't ruin our cap like Nicks would. They would have instant impact: then concentrate on depth in rounds 3-7......just a thought I haven't seen so far on the board.
We think a lot alike. I hope we get Grubbs, sine he'll be cheaper than Nicks. Then, go after Carr. Then, draft Cox #1, and a pass-rush specialist like Nick Perry, or Bruce Irvin, #2. Then, we go best available C/OG/ILB/DB the rest of the way.

Last edited by marchetta : 03-03-2012 at 10:40 PM.
marchetta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #6
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by newlander View Post
but he'll be alot less than Nicks. I like a proven commodity like Grubbs, which would free us up to draft defensive line in the first round. Plus, free agency is a certainly deeper and better for oline than for dline.
I really like Grubbs too. What I like more than Grubbs is Grubbs AND DeCastro. I hope Jerry and co. don't think that signing an FA guard means that guard can't be an option in the draft.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2012   #7
marchetta
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
2,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marchetta View Post
We think a lot alike. I hope we get Grubbs, since he'll be cheaper than Nicks. Then, go after Carr. Then, draft Cox #1, and a pass-rush specialist like Shea McClellin #2. Then, we go best available C/OG/ILB/DB the rest of the way.
Fixed.
marchetta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #8
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marchetta View Post
Fixed.
Cox in Round 1
S McClellin in Round 2 isn't bad at all.

and then possibly a CB in Round 3, or Blake at Center.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #9
marchetta
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
2,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods View Post
Cox in Round 1
S McClellin in Round 2 isn't bad at all.

and then possibly a CB in Round 3, or Blake at Center.
Oh, my! "It" moved!
marchetta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #10
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,882
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods View Post
Cox in Round 1
S McClellin in Round 2 isn't bad at all.

and then possibly a CB in Round 3, or Blake at Center.
I would be thrilled with that scenario.

Have a feeling it won't be Grubbs though, as someone mentioned more likely a guy like Wells.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #11
cowboy_ron
You Can't Fix Stupid
 
Joined:
Aug 2011
Posts:
3,842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woods View Post
Cox in Round 1
S McClellin in Round 2 isn't bad at all.

and then possibly a CB in Round 3, or Blake at Center.
Even though I prefer DeCastro in rd 1, if he's gone this is an excellent alternative
cowboy_ron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #12
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboy_ron View Post
Even though I prefer DeCastro in rd 1, if he's gone this is an excellent alternative
DeCastro is still my top pick as well at 14. But in case he's not there, I wouldn't be upset going DL.
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #13
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,580
Default

I think I'd prefer Poe. Unlike most, I view his rawness as a plus. I like the upside and versatility.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012   #14
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,550
Default

The reality here is that we can not sign a Grubbs or Nix and draft a DeCastro as well. Grubbs and Nix have all the leverage. They are not likely to sign a short contract IMO. They are also not likely to sign a relatively inexpensive contract. That means long term, expensive contract. We have expensive contracts with both our tackles. If we drafted DeCastro and he is everything everybody hopes he is, he is going to get paid in in four years. That means that at some point, we are going to have to lose one or two of these guys and it's going to create cape problems if we spend big money on our OL at every position. That's just the reality.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com