Romo, points scored...

[Nexx]

im gonna guess op is in his teens. this is the kind of stuff inexperience fans come up with. lets forgive his ignorance.

[Rynie]

Originally Posted by Cowboys&LakersFan

I'm stealing your sig pic.

[Nation]

Our PPG numbers are poor relative to our quarterback's play due to the fact that we don't run the ball effectively in the red zone and we don't create turnovers on defense.

[wittenacious]

Originally Posted by RW Hitman

this is too funny... there are always a few fans who like the guy sitting on the bench better than the guy starting. Even when the guy starting can wipe the floor with the backup LOL

Absolutely true. Never quite understand that thinking, myself.

[BraveHeartFan]

Originally Posted by Gameover

my last thought on this subject.stat geeks, look this up.

have you noticed the cowboys scoring went down as romo's mistakes(int/fumbles/decision making blunders) decreased.

When Romo had 13int(in 11 games?) and 19int, the cowboys scored points.Now that Romo's int's are in the single didgits, the cowboys cant approach 25ppg.

The reason i believe is romo plays it "safe" now.Romo is a reactor.He let the media get to him(about his turnovers).have you noticed he doesn't wear his cap backwards anymore?samething has happened to his game.he's changed it so the totals look nice, but(imo), tony leaves too many plays on the field by playing it "safe".

go ahead and tell me how silly i am for posting this

Nah. Silly doesn't even begin to describe how stupid an argument this is that you're trying to make.

Now you're going to piss on the guy for making less mistakes? No doubt you were, if you were around here then I don't remember, one of the loudest complainers about his mistakes being too costly.

Now the fact that he's making less mistakes its too costly to the Cowboys.


Dumb arguments are dumb and should be left inside your head and not out in the open for others to see.

[Kristen82]

Originally Posted by Gameover

yes to both questions!

who's a better player vince carter or andre miller?

[Red Dragon]

Originally Posted by Gameover

my last thought on this subject.stat geeks, look this up.

have you noticed the cowboys scoring went down as romo's mistakes(int/fumbles/decision making blunders) decreased.

When Romo had 13int(in 11 games?) and 19int, the cowboys scored points.Now that Romo's int's are in the single didgits, the cowboys cant approach 25ppg.

The reason i believe is romo plays it "safe" now.Romo is a reactor.He let the media get to him(about his turnovers).have you noticed he doesn't wear his cap backwards anymore?samething has happened to his game.he's changed it so the totals look nice, but(imo), tony leaves too many plays on the field by playing it "safe".

go ahead and tell me how silly i am for posting this

I'm actually in full agreement here.


Fans seem to prefer a QB who would throw for 15 TDs and no INTs rather than one that throws for 40 TDs and 20 INTs. Yet I would argue that the quarterback that threw the 40 touchdowns is the better player.