Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2012   #61
fanfromvirginia
Inconceivable!
 
fanfromvirginia's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
3,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
Yes, the numbers reflect a June 1st cut or a "designated" June 1st cut. The team is allowed to cut a player prior to June 1st but designate him as a June 1st cut in regards to the salary cap.

Terence Newman was a designated June 1st cut last year.


So we would owe 8.3 mil to the cap gods, which we might decide to spread over two years.

Really the money we owe him next year is only his seven mil salary. The rest of that cap hit is from his two signing bonuses, both of which have already been paid. So the way that source words it is a little misleading, IMO. Going forward it only costs 7 mil to keep him for 2012 and 8.3 to cut him (though the dead money hit can be spread out.)
The truth almost always lies somewhere in between...

Except on CZ.
fanfromvirginia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #62
fanfromvirginia
Inconceivable!
 
fanfromvirginia's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
3,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbeBeta View Post
I thought there was no such thing as a June 1st cut anymore.

But you are correct -- he'd cost 4.18 mill of "dead" money each year. But that isn't a bad thing if you consider that you free up 7 mill in 2013 and 8 mill in 2014. That 7 mill of additional cap space for 2013 gives more space than you need to find the best UFA RT on the market if we want to go that route
Agreed it isn't a bad thing. I am all for cutting Free in the offseason.
The truth almost always lies somewhere in between...

Except on CZ.
fanfromvirginia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #63
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fanfromvirginia View Post
Really the money we owe him next year is only his seven mil salary. The rest of that cap hit is from his two signing bonuses, both of which have already been paid. So the way that source words it is a little misleading, IMO. Going forward it only costs 7 mil to keep him for 2012 and 8.3 to cut him (though the dead money hit can be spread out.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post

Free's Cap "Hit" in 2013:

Keep 11.18M
(5.8M more than 2012)

Cut 4.18M
(1.2M less than 2012)
Yes, 7M is 11.18M - 4.18M, the difference between the Keep and Cut cap hits.

I guess it depends on the wording.

If you consider that the 8.35M in dead money is a hit against the cap regardless of whether Free is on the roster or cut, then you could say:

Keep = 7M additional dollars
Cut = Zero additional dollars

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #64
fanfromvirginia
Inconceivable!
 
fanfromvirginia's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Virginia
Posts:
3,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
Yes, 7M is 11.18M - 4.18M, the difference between the Keep and Cut cap hits.

I guess it depends on the wording.

If you consider that the 8.35M in dead money is a hit against the cap regardless of whether Free is on the roster or cut, then you could say:

Keep = 7M additional dollars
Cut = Zero additional dollars
That's still kind of a confusing way to say it, IMO. The difference between the keep and cut cap hits is either 7 mil (because the only money actually owed him next season is his salary) minus 8.35 mil (not June 1 cut) or 7 mil minus 4.175 mil (designated as June 1 cut). So he either costs us 1.35 million more off roster than on in 2013 or 2.825 mil less in 2013, with another 4.175 charged against our 2014 cap.

Basically, for 2012 it's the difference between what we would owe the person or what we would owe the cap gods.
The truth almost always lies somewhere in between...

Except on CZ.
fanfromvirginia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #65
EPL0c0
The Funcooker
 
EPL0c0's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Location:
El Paso, Tx
Posts:
4,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Romo 2 Austin View Post
We need a RT and a RG in the offseason, thats not out of the realm of possibility.
sorry, had to double-check. I thought this was a comment/post from 2009, no I mean 2010, wait, I mean 2011, er I mean...
CowboysL0c0
EPL0c0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #66
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fanfromvirginia View Post
That's still kind of a confusing way to say it, IMO. The difference between the keep and cut cap hits is either 7 mil (because the only money actually owed him next season is his salary) minus 8.35 mil (not June 1 cut) or 7 mil minus 4.175 mil (designated as June 1 cut). So he either costs us 1.35 million more off roster than on in 2013 or 2.825 mil less in 2013, with another 4.175 charged against our 2014 cap.

Basically, for 2012 it's the difference between what we would owe the person or what we would owe the cap gods.
Option 1 (keep)
11.18M Cap Hit in 2013

Option 2 (designate a June 1st cut)
4.18M Cap Hit in 2013

Option 3 (do NOT designate as a June 1st cut)
8.35M Cap Hit in 2013

Therefore, it is either:

Option 2
11.18M - 4.18M = 7M smaller hit in 2013 to cut

or

Option 3
11.18 - 8.35M = 2.83M smaller hit in 2013 to cut

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #67
Reverend Conehead
Senior Member
 
Reverend Conehead's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2009
Posts:
368
Default

I've been wondering all season why Free doesn't get benched. His technique is terrible. D-linemen get by him all the time and he resorts to holding and he gets too many false starts. I seriously wonder if there's a single worse o-lineman in the NFL.
Reverend Conehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #68
newlander
Senior Member
 
newlander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2006
Posts:
7,661
Default precisely...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenky View Post
Most of the time, he's getting owned 1 on 1 with a standard bull rush or a speed rush to the outside. He looks so weak to me.


.....he's the WEAKEST tackle in the league from what I"ve seen...plus every def. end that goes up against him gets UNDER his pads and just abuses him with a bull rush: my god, at some point you'd THINK the man could bend his knees and get his butt lower, anchor himself and do his job: nope.

His body language is the worst I've ever seen on a tackle. Romo is a SAINT for not drop kicking him in the nads after yet another vicious hit after a sack....literally saintly for not assaulting the fat clown. He looks 40 yrs. old btw....doesn't look like he's been on a hard, disciplined, structured weight plan his whole career. Even his arms are undefined and flabby, which is a shock with Woicek as the S&T coach.....hate him
newlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012   #69
jayhouston12
Senior Member
 
jayhouston12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Nov 2011
Posts:
543
Default

We don't know what Parnell could truly offer after seeing limited action

but as bad as people claim doug free is i'm sure they'd rather see Jerry Jones suit up at Left Tackle than free
jayhouston12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012   #70
neosapien23
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
2,604
Default

I don't understand why Garrett won't bench either Free or Ogletree, its downright infuriating. I think Dallas would make a bigger push for the playoffs if they could get these wastes of spaces on the bench. If Dallas doesn't make the playoffs, I hope Garrett is fired. There is no reason for Free to be in the starting lineup other than coaching incompetance. Even if Jones does want Free in the lineup, Garrett should put his foot down and play the better man. If Garrett cannot make the no duh call, he has no bussiness coaching a NFL team.
neosapien23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012   #71
TheSport78
The Excellence of Execution
 
TheSport78's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
7,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayhouston12 View Post
We don't know what Parnell could truly offer after seeing limited action

but as bad as people claim doug free is i'm sure they'd rather see Jerry Jones suit up at Left Tackle than free
We never knew what Miles Austin or DeMarco Murray could do until they got the OPPORTUNITY.
1. Brandon Magee will beat out Ernie Sims for the backup WILL/MO roster spot.

2. Ron Leary will start at right guard over Bernadeau.

3. Joseph Randle, Terrance Williams and Gavin Escobar will have more combined TD's than DeMarco Murray, Miles Austin and Jason Witten.

4. Bruce Carter makes the Pro Bowl.

5. The starting OL will be Smith-Livings-Frederick-Leary-Free
TheSport78 is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com