Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2013   #1
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,718
Default Am I the only one not excited about the safeties?

I don't know, Barron was almost hyped up as a top 5 pick last year, and well I never thought of him as anything close, possibly only a 1st-2nd prospect.

So this year was suppose to be a great class, and well I am starting to be very underwhelmed.

Before anyone thinks I am just anti-safety, note that the draft with Berry and Thomas I was super thrilled with both guys. Berry I wanted us to trade away practically anything for.

The NFL is filled with drab, mediocre and even awful safeties, it is a deficit.

So this class seems to be almost a so-so 2nd rounders to 3rd round quality for the most part. I know a couple were ok at making plays in college, but they always have huge faults after that.

Somebody cheer me up on this thing here.
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-22-2013   #2
Shinywalrus
Senior Member
 
Shinywalrus's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
1,737
Default

I find that safeties are never exciting in the draft these days.

These days, any safety with exceptional speed is more likely to play the more glamorous and lucrative corner position. Any safety without exceptional speed is likely to have knocks on him, that he doesn't have optimal closing speed, that he's more of a thumper, etc.

When you look at the successful safeties, that always ends up being a knock. Jairus Byrd didn't have the straightline speed to be a centerfielder. Eric Weddle had arms that were too short and didn't have the instincts to be a ball-hawk; he also wasn't nearly strong enough to play effectively in the box. The Browns were killed in the press for the TJ Ward pick, having selected a guy who didn't have the explosion or ball skills to play the centerfield and who couldn't disengage from blocks.

The best safeties in the NFL draft look flawed because, in large part, a premier safety with exceptional physical characteristics is almost always angling to play corner. Those left to play safety almost always ARE flawed. Only tight ends, kickers and punters get paid less than safeties when we're at the top end of the talent scale.

I'm not sure if I feel better or worse after that. Sorry.
Shinywalrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #3
Rack Bauer
Federal Agent
 
Rack Bauer's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Fort Hood
Posts:
21,739
Default

I don't think this is a great draft for elite safeties, but I do think there are a lot of 2nd tier safeties available this draft.
Rack Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #4
newlander
Senior Member
 
newlander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2006
Posts:
7,658
Default that's a spot on post..

[quote=Shinywalrus;4978007]I find that safeties are never exciting in the draft these days.

These days, any safety with exceptional speed is more likely to play the more glamorous and lucrative corner position. Any safety without exceptional speed is likely to have knocks on him, that he doesn't have optimal closing speed, that he's more of a thumper, etc.

When you look at the successful safeties, that always ends up being a knock. Jairus Byrd didn't have the straightline speed to be a centerfielder. Eric Weddle had arms that were too short and didn't have the instincts to be a ball-hawk; he also wasn't nearly strong enough to play effectively in the box. The Browns were killed in the press for the TJ Ward pick, having selected a guy who didn't have the explosion or ball skills to play the centerfield and who couldn't disengage from blocks.


...shinywalrus..it's a money thing and a coaching thing as well IMO. Not too many good college defensive coaches anymore teaching that position properly. Maybe 10 in the country : TOPS.
newlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #5
RS12
Senior Member
 
RS12's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
11,353
Default

Quote:
Am I the only one not excited about the safeties?
If you mean in the 1st round, you are not alone.
RS12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #6
tm1119
Senior Member
 
tm1119's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2006
Posts:
1,450
Default

I agree that the 1st round talent is iffy, but I think there is very good value in the 2nd and 3rd round to get a good quality player. Thomas, Rambo, and Swearinger can all be reliable coverage FS's, while guys like Duke Williams, Shawn Williams, or Shamarko Thomas could be useful in the box safties if Church doesn't work out or gets hurt again.
tm1119 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #7
ABQcowboyJR
Senior Member
 
ABQcowboyJR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
2,410
Default

Yes you are.
ABQcowboyJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #8
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Safeties are the position that's been hurt the most with the new protection rules. They can't hit anyone so the kill shot type safety has gone the way of the dinosaur.

It's hard to get excited about a safety who is a solid tackler because he's going to be mediocre in coverage because if he was great in coverage he'd be a higher dollar corner.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #9
AsthmaField
Outta bounds
 
AsthmaField's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Laguna Seca
Posts:
8,650
Default

I like this year's safety class, but it isn't full of blue chip types. There's no Berry or Thomas in this crop, but there are quite a few late first/early second round types that are much better than solid.

The main excitement I have for the position is because of the type of defense we are now running and how Kiffin uses the position. He is going to have the safety doing more than they have been in Dallas the last several years, and with that will come many more plays from the position.

I see a guy like Matt Elam and feel like he'd be all over the field for Kiffin. IMO, he'd be almost ideal in our new defense, and would bring a physical presence we've lacked for years. Others like Vaccaro might be a little better in coverage, but he lacks the quickness, explosion and intimidation that Elam would provide.

I would only take Elam in the late first with a trade back... but I would be pretty excited about that. Move back, get an additional 2nd and get an OL and a DL in the second round.

No other safety gets me excited about what they'd bring to the table other than Elam though... even though Vaccaro is probably going to end up higher rated.
AsthmaField is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #10
unionjack8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2007
Location:
Toronto
Posts:
1,328
Default

DJ Swearinger with a star on his helmet come september
unionjack8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #11
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unionjack8 View Post
DJ Swearinger with a star on his helmet come september
I love watching that guy play. Hits like a LB and covers like a CB.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #12
DEMARC0MURRAY29
Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2012
Posts:
61
Default

Elam is the only guy that excites me in this year's class.

DEMARC0MURRAY29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #13
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,207
Default

Elam looked pretty lost in coverage in that highlight video. He caught some badly thrown balls. He looked lost when he had his back to the QB with his arms waving madly about. He is a good tackler, he can evade blocks and he arrives with attitude.

He looks okay but I think he should be more of a mid-second to mid-third rounder because of size limitations and coverage deficiencies.
Eskimo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013   #14
The Realist
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,264
Default

I'm excited about Thomas. 6-1/215, 8 picks, 12 TFL, 4 sacks, 4 FF, 13 PD.
The Realist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013   #15
kirkjrk
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
693
Default

Watch Tony Jefferson move up in the draft to 2nd round-Mid. I like him.
kirkjrk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com