Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-27-2013   #1
Galian Beast
Senior Member
 
Galian Beast's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
6,764
Default Coaching isn't a problem?

When was the last time we had a truly productive rookie draft class?

A lot of teams with great success do so because they are able to bring their rookies along faster. Often this means they are role players. They are asked to fulfill a role, and they do just that. I keep feeling as though we don't play rookies at all unless we have no choice, because a starter is injured. And when this happen we expect them to do everything. This isn't conducive to success, especially since they haven't received much playing time or snaps in practice.

Something has got to change fundamentally in the way we bring rookies, 2nd and 3rd year players along on this team.

If you're drafted within the first 3 rounds, you're supposed to be seeing some significant playing time. 1st round draft picks are supposed to be starters, maybe even 2nd round draft picks. 3rd round draft picks? They should be getting some serious playing time.

Where was Tyrone Crawford this year? Wilber was a 4th round draft pick, but where was he? Matt Johnson has a lot to make up for due to his injuries, but I definitely think he should be given a shot to make a difference on this team. Same with Danny Coale.

I think a lot of that has do with being in 3-4. When you ask a college player to learn a completely new position, it's going to set their progress back significantly.

When you make players like Albright learn a new position, then switch them to another position, and then back... You aren't going to get much out of them. At least not early.
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
Galian Beast is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-27-2013   #2
batman36
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
508
Default

Some teams are reticent to play young players, or rookies, when they believe they are 'in the hunt.' I think because of Jerry's optimistic outlook, maybe the youngun's here don't play as much. And, yes, I am probably wrong about that.
batman36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #3
jjktkk
Senior Member
 
jjktkk's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2008
Location:
Lewisville, Tx.
Posts:
1,625
Default

Crawford had a solid year. Besides Claiborne, seems like the rest were held back by injuries, so hard to evaluate them.
jjktkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #4
IAMKING
Banned
 
IAMKING's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Posts:
1,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjktkk View Post
Crawford had a solid year. Besides Claiborne, seems like the rest were held back by injuries, so hard to evaluate them.
No not excuses on why weren't productive. The question is when is the last time we had a truly productive class.
IAMKING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #5
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galian Beast View Post
When was the last time we had a truly productive rookie draft class?

A lot of teams with great success do so because they are able to bring their rookies along faster. Often this means they are role players. They are asked to fulfill a role, and they do just that. I keep feeling as though we don't play rookies at all unless we have no choice, because a starter is injured. And when this happen we expect them to do everything. This isn't conducive to success, especially since they haven't received much playing time or snaps in practice.

Something has got to change fundamentally in the way we bring rookies, 2nd and 3rd year players along on this team.

If you're drafted within the first 3 rounds, you're supposed to be seeing some significant playing time. 1st round draft picks are supposed to be starters, maybe even 2nd round draft picks. 3rd round draft picks? They should be getting some serious playing time.

[View Full Quote]
2010 R1 Dez Bryant
2010 R2 Sean Lee
2010 R3 No Pick

2011 R1 Tyron Smith
2011 R2 Bruce Carter
2011 R3 DeMarco Murray

2012 R1 Morris Claiborne
2012 R2 No Pick
2012 R3 Tyrone Crawford

Crawford played a significant number of snaps this season.

All of the others are starters.

Kyle Wilbur - He has 2 injuries but still played a small number of snaps.
Matt Johnson - Injured
Danny Coale - Injured

Alex Albright - His college position didn't exist in the Cowboys 3-4 scheme. He has become one of, if not the best special teams player on the team.

The biggest fail in the last 3 drafts has been David Arkin. His problem has been size/strength. The only thing the Coaches could do with him is slip him some Roids.

The biggest overall fail was the 2009 draft. That problem started with the Roy Williams trade which cost a 1st and 3rd. The 1st two picks were Jason Williams and Robert Brewster.

It turned out that Brewster was lazy and didn't enjoy football.

Jason Williams was very fast, but had rarely played any coverage in college due to the scheme. They referred to his college position as "stand-up lineman". You might be able to put some blame on the coaches for this player, but he has not developed into a starter in Carolina either despite 2012 being his 5th year in the NFL.

The area where I believe that Garrett has had the most positive influence on the team is in the evaluation of the Mental-Makeup of players. He has over-emphasized Right-Kind-of-Guy. He even hired an outside company that specializes in doing these types of evaluations. Better emphasis on the Mental-Makeup of draft picks would have prevented the drafting of Robert Brewster (lazy) and Jason Williams (intelligence/instincts), IMO.

.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #6
jjktkk
Senior Member
 
jjktkk's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2008
Location:
Lewisville, Tx.
Posts:
1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IAMKING View Post
No not excuses on why weren't productive. The question is when is the last time we had a truly productive class.
05, without question. I will say that I have been encouraged with the past couple of drafts though.
jjktkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #7
Galian Beast
Senior Member
 
Galian Beast's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
6,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
2010 R1 Dez Bryant
2010 R2 Sean Lee
2010 R3 No Pick

2011 R1 Tyron Smith
2011 R2 Bruce Carter
2011 R3 DeMarco Murray

2012 R1 Morris Claiborne
2012 R2 No Pick
2012 R3 Tyrone Crawford

Crawford played a significant number of snaps this season.

All of the others are starters.

Kyle Wilbur - He has 2 injuries but still played a small number of snaps.
Matt Johnson - Injured
Danny Coale - Injured

Alex Albright - His college position didn't exist in the Cowboys 3-4 scheme. He has become one of, if not the best special teams player on the team.

The biggest fail in the last 3 drafts has been David Arkin. His problem has been size/strength. The only thing the Coaches could do with him is slip him some Roids.

[View Full Quote]

Only Smith and Claiborne were starters in their rookie years. We didn't get anything out of Sean Lee and Bruce Carter their rookie years. DeMarco Murray only became a starter because Felix Jones got hurt. How much did we use him during the games before he became a starter? Crawford also only got more snaps due to injuries.

The coaches need to find things that rookies can focus on, excel in, and use them towards that purpose while they gain understanding of the system and level of play in the nfl.
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
Galian Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #8
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post

The area where I believe that Garrett has had the most positive influence on the team is in the evaluation of the Mental-Makeup of players. He has over-emphasized Right-Kind-of-Guy. He even hired an outside company that specializes in doing these types of evaluations. .

.
So no Manti for the Boys?
WPBCowboysFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #9
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,249
Default

Murray was injured all preseason and was just getting his feet warm in the regular season when Felix went down so it is hard to say what would have happened. You also have to remember that RBs who can block tend to make a quick progression to the pro game.

Lee played a fair bit as a rookie after the mid-way point once Garrett took over. His biggest problem was that he was playing behind two well regard vets at ILB and had a few injuries his rookie year.

Bruce Carter was just too far behind after missing all of TC, preseason and then the first six weeks of the regular season to really get in there and learn a new position as an ILB in a 3-4. I don't think you can blame him under the circumstances for not doing more in his rookie season.

IMO, most 2nd and 3rd rounders don't play a lot in their rookie seasons unless forced into action by injury. It is really the second and third years where they start to excel.

I do agree that we should try to do a better job of getting them to hit the ground running but this is a universal issue across the league. I do think under Wade we were incredibly slow about integrating rookie and 2nd year players but that may also be due to how bad we were drafting during the Wade years. If you remember Wade's players Carpenter (picked under BP) didn't start. Spencer didn't start until his 3rd year. Felix was a backup for 2.5 years. Jenkins didn't really start until the latter part of his first year. In 2010, Dez played #3 WR so that is a partial starter. So I think Garrett's coaches have been a fair bit quicker at getting the new players onto the field so there are signs of improvement.
Eskimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #10
kirkjrk
Senior Member
 
Joined:
May 2012
Posts:
695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by batman36 View Post
Some teams are reticent to play young players, or rookies, when they believe they are 'in the hunt.' I think because of Jerry's optimistic outlook, maybe the youngun's here don't play as much. And, yes, I am probably wrong about that.
Hanna should have gotten more playing time last year, and because of that he may start slow this coming year.
kirkjrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #11
jjktkk
Senior Member
 
jjktkk's Avatar
Years Donated
2010
 
Joined:
Mar 2008
Location:
Lewisville, Tx.
Posts:
1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirkjrk View Post
Hanna should have gotten more playing time last year, and because of that he may start slow this coming year.
Have to disagree. Hanna came on at the end of the season. His play towards the end of the season, should give him and the coaches the confidence that he can play a bigger role in the offense next season.
jjktkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #12
Galian Beast
Senior Member
 
Galian Beast's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
6,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo View Post
Murray was injured all preseason and was just getting his feet warm in the regular season when Felix went down so it is hard to say what would have happened. You also have to remember that RBs who can block tend to make a quick progression to the pro game.

Lee played a fair bit as a rookie after the mid-way point once Garrett took over. His biggest problem was that he was playing behind two well regard vets at ILB and had a few injuries his rookie year.

Bruce Carter was just too far behind after missing all of TC, preseason and then the first six weeks of the regular season to really get in there and learn a new position as an ILB in a 3-4. I don't think you can blame him under the circumstances for not doing more in his rookie season.

IMO, most 2nd and 3rd rounders don't play a lot in their rookie seasons unless forced into action by injury. It is really the second and third years where they start to excel.

[View Full Quote]
I'm not blaming the players at all. And there is always an excuse. The common link is the coaching and schemes. It would be hard to prove, but I also think that playing in a position that you aren't familiar with also leads to more injuries.

It's time to stop drafting players to be what we want them to be, and start drafting them for what they are. This conversion mentality just doesn't work at an acceptable rate.

You have 3-4 years with a young developing player. We waste all that time trying to fit them to our system, rather than fitting our system to them. They either bust or by the time they are good they go play elsewhere in the NFL. Kevin Burnett, Chris Canty, Stephen Bowen. Or the players we just give up on like Antonio Bryant, Danny Amendola or Erik Walden.

We get these new journeymen year after year rather than try to put together a proper farm system. Is every player going to be successful? Obviously not. All I'm saying is try to put these guys in situations where they can be successful.

Why did Joey Galloway go on to have great years in Tampa Bay? The reality is we put emphasis in the wrong areas. A wide receiver isn't doing well, must be their fault. Well, hold on a second, why don't we look at the QB passing to them? Their offensive line? The scheme?

How many people wanted to run Dez Bryant out of town earlier this year?
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
Galian Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #13
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Galian Beast View Post
Where was Tyrone Crawford this year? Wilber was a 4th round draft pick, but where was he?
Crawford - Do you watch our games?

Wilbur - Did you follow his injury situation?

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #14
Galian Beast
Senior Member
 
Galian Beast's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
6,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by big dog cowboy View Post
Crawford - Do you watch our games?

Wilbur - Did you follow his injury situation?
Crawford got more playing time because of injuries on the defensive line, but in my opinion it was too little too late.

Wilbur, I did follow the injury situation. Which goes to my point. When a player has to learn a new position, what happens when they get injured and miss a lot of time? They have ZERO room for error. You don't learn this new position, and you aren't going to play at all. There goes a 4th round draft pick.

You put him at a position that he already knows and for the most part he can come from an injury and still produce in certain situations. That's the folly of forcing systems on to players, and coaches not finding out how to use them.
In the final two months of 2011, Romo’s passer rating was 115.9.
Galian Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013   #15
theogt
Surrealist
 
theogt's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Posts:
43,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjktkk View Post
Crawford had a solid year. Besides Claiborne, seems like the rest were held back by injuries, so hard to evaluate them.
Agree with this.

Claiborne - Started all year. Met expectations.
Crawford - Contributed significantly. Met expectations.
Wilber - Special teamer. I guess that meets expectations.
Johnson - Hurt.
Coale - Hurt.
Hanna - Contributed. Hugely exceeded expectations.
McSurdy - Hurt.

So, basically, Wilber is what is being complained about? I never liked the pick in the first place, but it's hardly a reason to complain that the coaching staff isn't properly using draft picks.
theogt is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com