Originally Posted by superpunk
I've answered it 80 billion times you just don't like the answer. Not my problem.
For crying out loud!
You are claiming that the Cowboys have drafted poorly. OK! That is an arguable claim that many will support, and others not.
Your problem is that you are trying to support that argument with this spreadsheet. It's problem is that it shows mathematically that you are better off drafting poorly than drafting well. Since this is patently absurd, the spreadsheet is poorly formulated and, therefore, worthless.
Everyone understands that there are several ways to build a team. But, when so many good teams (as measured by winning -- the object of all team-building plans) are at the bottom of this chart, and so many poor teams are at the top, it should indicate that the chart originators were mistaken in their parameters for draft success.
Regardless of how any individual team builds its roster, good drafting should correlate to winning when you measure all 32 teams over 5 years. You need to find a chart that demonstrates this.