Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2013   #16
da_whiz_kid
Senior Member
 
da_whiz_kid's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
628
Default

Go Dline.

Draft a WR in the 5th at the earliest.

Josh Boyce. Taller, runs great routes, smart football player, and is a real deep threat. Versatile WR who can play on the outside and the inside.
If you build it, he will run...
da_whiz_kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #17
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,726
Default

Interesting thought for those who are talking strictly about the Oline, if you heard Mayock and others use the phrase "converting speed into power". Slow big guys are not what the NFL is about anymore, you have to have the guys who can finish the equation of using athleticism and speed and capitalizing at the end to punctuate the speed with power.

My answer is both with speed first, translate power.
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #18
Thatkidbob
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Sep 2009
Posts:
296
Default

I like strength in the trenches and speed at the skill positions.
Thatkidbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #19
MonsterD
De puts the D back in D
 
MonsterD's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2007
Posts:
2,726
Default

Not going to lie, I would be pretty happy to get Austin, we can draft smart in this draft and still come away with good Oline picks.
MonsterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #20
Kristen82
Senior Member
 
Kristen82's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2012
Location:
Canada
Posts:
598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsterD View Post
Interesting thought for those who are talking strictly about the Oline, if you heard Mayock and others use the phrase "converting speed into power". Slow big guys are not what the NFL is about anymore, you have to have the guys who can finish the equation of using athleticism and speed and capitalizing at the end to punctuate the speed with power.

My answer is both with speed first, translate power.
Don't need to be big to be a force, at least in the secondary. Momentum = mass * velocity after all. That's why you see small fast guys like Whitner being big hitters. Think I'd rather go with speed esp. on D given the prevalence of athletic QB's who can throw out of the pocket and break long runs out of the read-option, plus teams using the spread and multiple WR's. DB's and LB's have more ground to cover against that formation.


My favorite hobby - watching Mustangs fall behind in the rearview mirror of my '01 C5.

Kristen82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #21
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,727
Default

It is the ratio of speed to size that matters.

I created what I call a Forty Freak Score. It attempts to scale up to compare bigger players with a 200 lbs player that runs a 4.4 forty.

Anything over Zero is similar to a player that weights 200 lbs running faster than a 4.4 forty. A negative number is similar to a player that weighs 200 lbs running slower than a 4.4 forty.

It is the last column on the right.

IMO, measureables are useful for differentiating players with similar demonstrated performance on the field. It's like having an extra scouting report.

(click twice to enlarge)


You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #22
Mansta54
Senior Member
 
Mansta54's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Location:
Germantown, Mary
Posts:
9,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frozen700 View Post
Strength
^^^This^^^^ Especially on the oline but I damn sure like Austins speed and ability too.
Mansta54 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #23
skinsscalper
Senior Member
 
skinsscalper's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2009, 2012
 
Joined:
Mar 2006
Posts:
4,906
Default

Strength on offense and speed on defense. That's how the 90's Cowboys were built and I have no doubt that same formula can work in today's NFL.


The Washington Redskins.............where former Pro Bowlers go to suck.


skinsscalper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #24
Star4Ever
Senior Member
 
Star4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2006
Location:
Bowling Green, K
Posts:
5,501
Send a message via Yahoo to Star4Ever
Default

I prefer OL that can pass block and run block. I don't give a crap how they get it done.
Star4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013   #25
ghst187
Senior Member
 
ghst187's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2004
Location:
Right behind you
Posts:
5,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkilz88 View Post
I would never take a player that's only 5-8 1/2 174 at any position in the first round. First rounders should always be guys that have it all; size, speed, smarts.
Desean Jackson turned out to be a bust eh? (minus the fact he's a human turd)
Still left to accomplish:
sign OT Winston or G Moore
ghst187 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013   #26
CowboysYanksLakers
Senior Member
 
CowboysYanksLakers's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2012
Location:
The Mid Altantic
Posts:
2,129
Default

I like strength on the both lines!

CowboysYanksLakers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013   #27
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLcowboy View Post
I don't see how he improves the Oline. If Romo can't get the ball away, no receiver is going to succeed. And, just how long would a 170 pound receiver last in the league running crossing routes.
With the no blows to the head rule, no hitting defenseless receivers rule and the no chuck after five yards rule I think a small WR can do just fine but he usually needs exceptional quickness and/or speed to make an impact. Austin has both in spades so I think he's a great threat to have for teams that run 3-WR offenses where he is basically a starter out of the slot.

When you add in his return game contributions and ability to run the ball out of the backfield I think he is an okay value in the mid-first round.
Eskimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013   #28
Eskimo
Senior Member
 
Eskimo's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Edmonton, Albert
Posts:
12,249
Default

In general, at most positions I want adequate strength for the job and ++quickness/agility, ++explosiveness/power and +speed.

Perhaps NT is the one position where I prefer ++strength over speed.

Even along the OL you're usually going to be a better blocker if you can play with quickness and agility to get into better position to make your blocks than you will with extra strength to try and bulldoze the 300 pound guy in front of you.
Eskimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013   #29
kazzd58
Senior Member
 
kazzd58's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
115
Default

I'd rather draft WR Patterson from TN than Austin
kazzd58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013   #30
LittleD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Bedford, Texas
Posts:
691
Default Both...

I favor brute strength on the OL & RB so that the team can help Romo out by running the ball more effectively. I favor all out speed on the defense so that the opposition QB has to hurry into mistakes. JMVHO...
LittleD is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com