Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2008   #1
ABQcowboyJR
Senior Member
 
ABQcowboyJR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
2,410
Default DT in draft

I know everybody has a different view on how we should handle the first round. I have not completely made up my mind about it either. What if we were to take a DT high in the draft. Someone like Okam from UT. Thoughts?
ABQcowboyJR is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 03-13-2008   #2
CrazyCowboy
Senior Member
 
CrazyCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Schertz, TX
Posts:
32,066
Default

or the big, fast Aggie DT


Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
CrazyCowboy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #3
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,049
Default

As long as the guy is worth the draft spot, I'm all for it. We really need a true 34 NT so we can get Ratliff at end.

Besides the guys mentioned, I like the guy from Iowa State... Though he may not go that high.
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #4
Dash28
Felis silvestris catus
 
Dash28's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
5,065
Default

Yea, I like Rubin a lot too. I would like to get one of the 3 mentioned above and allow Ratliff to move back to end, even though he filled it really well at NT.
Dash28 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #5
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,850
Default

In the third wound it would be superb.

if we were to draft Otah or Bryant and get CB,WR, and RB taken care of before that that would be ideal.

Doing so would mean placing Ratliff opposite Canty and Tank in the middle. rotating in Spear, Hatcher, rookie and possible Bowen would be most excellent.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #6
ABQcowboyJR
Senior Member
 
ABQcowboyJR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
2,410
Default

I was under the impression that the style that Wade played did not involve a huge true NT, but rather a strong athlet DT. So maybe we do not move anybody on the line.
ABQcowboyJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #7
FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
 
FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
Nowhereland
Posts:
13,850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQcowboyJR View Post
I was under the impression that the style that Wade played did not involve a huge true NT, but rather a strong athlet DT. So maybe we do not move anybody on the line.
He had Williams in SD who is oneof the biggest players in the league. He says in Denver he used guys like Kragen who weren't very big.

He is one of the only coaches the actually means it when he says he fits his scheme to his players.
“Cynicism is nothing but intellectual cowardice.”
- Henry Rollins

Planning to fail is not the same as planning for failure.
FuzzyLumpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #8
ABQcowboyJR
Senior Member
 
ABQcowboyJR's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Posts:
2,410
Default

so.....?
ABQcowboyJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #9
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQcowboyJR View Post
I was under the impression that the style that Wade played did not involve a huge true NT, but rather a strong athlet DT. So maybe we do not move anybody on the line.
True, he doesn't have to be the immovable fireplug type, but it would still be nice if he were a little bigger and stronger than what we have.

I just think Ratliff would be a better end, mainly.
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #10
dcfanatic
Banned
 
Joined:
Mar 2006
Location:
New York
Posts:
10,408
Default

Trevor Laws is the only NT I would draft for the Cowboys within the first five rounds this year.

High motor guys are the only DT/NT's who will succeed in Wade's 3-4 defense.
dcfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #11
Bob Sacamano
Banned
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
57,074
Default

Wade says he doesn't need a plugger in the middle, but he's a defend-the-run-1st kind of guy, so the NT can't be one who does nothing but shoot gaps, but he can't be an immobile one either, which is probably why they were talking to Red Bryant, that guy can scoot
Bob Sacamano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008   #12
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQcowboyJR View Post
I know everybody has a different view on how we should handle the first round. I have not completely made up my mind about it either. What if we were to take a DT high in the draft. Someone like Okam from UT. Thoughts?
Okam showed up at the combine like 25 pounds overweight, and ran a miserable 40 there... unless he gets serious about working out between now and Texas' Pro Day (which IIRC is March 19th), he's probably down to about a 4th rounder now... it will take a great performance at those Pro Day workouts to resurrect his draft stock...

The DT who is getting positive press these days is Red Bryant from Texas A&M, who is drawing favorable comparisons to Casey Hampton... he might still be on the board when the Boys pick at the end of the third round, but he might be gone by then, so if the Boys like him (and there are reports they do like him), then they might be forced to take him at the end of the second round...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008   #13
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocolate Lab View Post
As long as the guy is worth the draft spot, I'm all for it. We really need a true 34 NT so we can get Ratliff at end.

Besides the guys mentioned, I like the guy from Iowa State... Though he may not go that high.

I'm with you....the kid is a football player and he needs to be a Cowboy on draft day. I really think this defense will be much better off with Ratliff (love the guy, but he is not a true nose tackle) at end and a NT with a big ole' arse replacing him.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008   #14
DaBoys4Life
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2008
Location:
Cowboy Nation
Posts:
15,621
Default

Okam isn't a high pick and just continues to drop
DaBoys4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008   #15
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,561
Default

Okam would fit the profile perfectly IMO. I agree with those who say Okam has underachieved but the natural ability Okam has is unreal. That is a guy who could play strong at the point of attack and penatrate both. Williams in SD is a big guy but he's also very quick. I think Okam will go higher then the 4th round. I think maybe 3rd or late second. He's just got too much natural ability. Having said that, I'd probably rather see us take Rubin, Dre Moore or Pressley later in the draft.
ABQCOWBOY is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com