Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2005 Archives > 2005 Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2004   #1
Shotgun Dave
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2004
Posts:
1,381
Default Hi Everyone! Check this unreal mock!

Check out this mock!

Believe it or not, it actually has us taking both Mark Clayton AND Mike Williams with our first two picks! I sent the guy an email asking how in the world he could actually predict that but I've gotten no response yet.

I kinda like the idea to be honest with you!

http://www.profootballdraft.com/editordraft04.php


Assuming Edwards, Williams, AND Clayton are all available for us to pick, which would you take - and would you consider taking 2 WR's with our top picks?
Shotgun Dave is offline  

Old 12-04-2004   #2
da_boyz_mk
How 'Bout Dem Cowboys
 
da_boyz_mk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,125
Default

this guy has pollack going number 3 to the readskins.....umm don' think so. whoever did this mock is out of the loop...thanks for posting it though.


Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable. - Tom Landry
da_boyz_mk is offline  
Old 12-04-2004   #3
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotgun Dave
Check out this mock!

Believe it or not, it actually has us taking both Mark Clayton AND Mike Williams with our first two picks! I sent the guy an email asking how in the world he could actually predict that but I've gotten no response yet.

I kinda like the idea to be honest with you!

http://www.profootballdraft.com/editordraft04.php


Assuming Edwards, Williams, AND Clayton are all available for us to pick, which would you take - and would you consider taking 2 WR's with our top picks?
Welcome to the forum and thanks for posting a new Mock to look at.
Hostile is offline  
Old 12-04-2004   #4
SALADIN
Jumper
 
SALADIN's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
SF Bay Area
Posts:
1,787
Send a message via Yahoo to SALADIN
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shotgun Dave
Check out this mock!

Believe it or not, it actually has us taking both Mark Clayton AND Mike Williams with our first two picks! I sent the guy an email asking how in the world he could actually predict that but I've gotten no response yet.

I kinda like the idea to be honest with you!

http://www.profootballdraft.com/editordraft04.php


Assuming Edwards, Williams, AND Clayton are all available for us to pick, which would you take - and would you consider taking 2 WR's with our top picks?
Where are the QB's? Kyle Orton is the first QB taken? fat chance.

With Johnson, Glenn, and Morgan picking two WR that early only to have them play limmited roles in the offense would seem to be a little bit of a waste. I'd rather see players fill more glaring needs like DE and DB where they can make more of an immediate impact.
SALADIN is offline  
Old 12-04-2004   #5
DLK150
The Quiet Man
 
DLK150's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Mishawaka, IN
Posts:
1,308
Default

Thanks for the mock, but that guy's daft. No way in Hades we draft two WRs in round one, not with the work we need on the DL and secondary.

Besides, Parcells has only drafted 2 WRs in the first round since he's been coaching, if I'm right. I don't think he's ever drafted one when he's still building the core of his team, either.
DLK150 is offline  
Old 12-05-2004   #6
Shotgun Dave
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2004
Posts:
1,381
Default Ignoring the offense for a minute..WOW, wouldn't that be something though?

I mean, I know most mocks are way off (and this guys is pretty far off THAT mark) but imagine getting arguably the top 2 WR's? Imagine Henson, Williams, Edwards, Julius and Witten with a couple of years under their belts?

Think about it. If Frazier pans out (and I think he just might be the guy), we can snag Ferguson from NY, and Woody comes back from injury to play one more solid year, we could focus our first 2 or 3 picks on building a lights-out offense. We could even spend our 2nd rounder on a solid RG or RT maybe to push Tucker/Gurode.

BTW, I won't be posting mocks based on their believability so much - moreso their UNbelievability. It's fun to play the "what if" game.

I predict that Dallas picks 6th overall and 14th overall. I further predict that Dallas drafts Mike Williams at 6 and Pollack at 14. Williams is too good to pass up and would form the nucleus Parcells wants with Henson/Jones. Pollack is the sort of overachiever/non-stop motor guy Parcells loves.

Last edited by Shotgun Dave : 12-05-2004 at 10:06 AM. Reason: typed the wrong thing
Shotgun Dave is offline  
Old 12-08-2004   #7
tyke1doe
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Southeast, Unite
Posts:
17,490
Send a message via AIM to tyke1doe
Default

Absolutely ridiculous draft given our needs.
tyke1doe is offline  
Old 12-11-2004   #8
ghettogandhi
Senior Member
 
ghettogandhi's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
maryland
Posts:
992
Default

NOT A BAD DRAFT- IWOULD LOVE EDWARDS AND WILLIAMS BUT THERE IS LITTLE CHANCE IN HELL THEY LAST TO OUR PICKS IN THE LATE TEENS AND EARLY 20S

THAT OFFENSE WOULD BE KILLER FOR YEARS TO COME

THEN IN THE OFFSEASON SIGN KEN LUCAS AND JOHN ABRAHAM OR SHAUN ELLIS AND MOVE PETE HUNTER BACK TO FS AND YOU HAVE A SOLID DEFENSE ALSO

Quote:
Originally Posted by tyke1doe
Absolutely ridiculous draft given our needs.
ghettogandhi is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com