I am now convinced that Ty Law is coming to Dallas - Page 3 - Dallas Cowboys Forum

Nors · 05-20-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajuncowboy

Also keep in mind that it is extremly out of character for someone who is a client of the Postons. If there was not something already done, the Postons would be screaming and yelling about how their man is being Dissed by the Pats. I think in 12 days Law is a Cowboy. Or at least on a team other than the Pats. If not Us it could be the Packers. If the Pack loses McKenzie they could easily trade the pick they aquire to the Pats for Law. Just thinking.

I sense Ty has a contract in place with Boys just as Milloy did. This is all about draft pick compensation. Pats want a one, we don't want to pay a 1. This will drag on past 6-1 - JMO

We get him for our 2nd First rounder and we get a throw in player - Larry Izzo on top of Law

Hostile · 05-20-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

I sense Ty has a contract in place with Boys just as Milloy did. This is all about draft pick compensation. Pats want a one, we don't want to pay a 1. This will drag on past 6-1 - JMO

We get him for our 2nd First rounder and we get a throw in player - Larry Izzo on top of Law

Milloy had a contract in place with the Cowboys? Then why did he go to Buffalo?

I don't think law will be here, but I won't hate it.

Cajuncowboy · 05-20-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hostile

Milloy had a contract in place with the Cowboys? Then why did he go to Buffalo?

I don't think law will be here, but I won't hate it.

I think he meant like the deal that Milloy had with Buffalo. Not Dallas.

Nors · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajuncowboy

I think he meant like the deal that Milloy had with Buffalo. Not Dallas.

Its not below agents to troll for contract offers on the sly

jdnalls · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt

I would like to see Law on this team....but I just do NOT see it happening for many reasons.

Yeah, the Postons for one.

jdnalls · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

I sense Ty has a contract in place with Boys just as Milloy did. This is all about draft pick compensation. Pats want a one, we don't want to pay a 1. This will drag on past 6-1 - JMO

We get him for our 2nd First rounder and we get a throw in player - Larry Izzo on top of Law

Nors, lately you seem to be pulling too much out of your backside. Wait until you actually have facts before you go spreading more typical Nors rumors.

Bach · 05-21-2004

Frankly, I don't see any solid indications that Ty is on his way to Dallas. And I would be ticked if we gave up either of our first rounders next year for a 30-something year old CB. Granted he is good and will probably be good for a few more seasons, but you don't want to use a #1 pick on a player who will only be at a high level for 2-3 years.

I'd much rather keep both #1's and hopefully get two players who will start for us for 6+ years.

jdnalls · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bach

Frankly, I don't see any solid indications that Ty is on his way to Dallas. And I would be ticked if we gave up either of our first rounders next year for a 30-something year old CB. Granted he is good and will probably be good for a few more seasons, but you don't want to use a #1 pick on a player who will only be at a high level for 2-3 years.

I'd much rather keep both #1's and hopefully get two players who will start for us for 6+ years.

There weren't any indications of that happening.

It's just more typical Nors conspiracies.

Hostile · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by cajuncowboy

I think he meant like the deal that Milloy had with Buffalo. Not Dallas.

Yeah, I know. Just pulling his leg.

He comes up with the best conspiracy theories on the forum. One day one of them will stick and we'll never hear the end of it.

drover · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hostile

Milloy had a contract in place with the Cowboys? Then why did he go to Buffalo?

I don't think law will be here, but I won't hate it.

New to the board drover the name: I feel that they will go with what they have this year 1 Hunter did show some flash and they want to get a better look at correcting his mistakes. 2 They aren,t going to give a draft choice out of next years draft in the event Hunter doesn't work out they have two frist rounders and one could go to the best CB. 3 Law is plain going to cost too much and JJ has the rep to be quite fruggle with the cap money. Also Law's age will play a factor on how many years he could contribute if they did come off a bundle to pay him. He wants too much money. I know there are ties to Mr. Bill and Law but I don't think it would be in their best interest to tie up future cap money for a player that has been un the league as long as he has. They'll go with a younger player to make future contributions. Thats my Rulen.

Nors · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdnalls

There weren't any indications of that happening.

It's just more typical Nors conspiracies.

There are indications and talk of that here in New England country.
And BTW it is slow going into training camp. Whats wrong with discussing a Law pickup?

TruBlueCowboy · 05-21-2004

I wouldn't mind the Cowboys spending a high draft pick and high salary on Ty Law. The Cowboys may not be one player away from a Super Bowl team, but they are one player away from a devastating defense. Ty Law and Terence Newman, I still drool thinking about it. I'd love to see it happen. I won't jump off the Ty Law bandwagon until the first week of the season.

btcutter · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bach

Frankly, I don't see any solid indications that Ty is on his way to Dallas. And I would be ticked if we gave up either of our first rounders next year for a 30-something year old CB. Granted he is good and will probably be good for a few more seasons, but you don't want to use a #1 pick on a player who will only be at a high level for 2-3 years.

I'd much rather keep both #1's and hopefully get two players who will start for us for 6+ years.

I am not for trading a #1 for Law. However, if I can get guarrenteed good/pro bowel yrs from proven..ie >4yrs, I would think hard about that. Statistics have shown that at least 1/2 of the 1st rounders never live up to the hype and some are out of the league by yr 4, while other are just steady performers.

Nors · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by btcutter

I am not for trading a #1 for Law. However, if I can get guarrenteed good/pro bowel yrs from proven..ie >4yrs, I would think hard about that. Statistics have shown that at least 1/2 of the 1st rounders never live up to the hype and some are out of the league by yr 4, while other are just steady performers.

Law is a natural to move to free safety and could play in the NFL well into his mid/late 30's.

Do you do it for a 2? I think the Pats are playing hardball and holding for a 1.
This will play out in training camp.

btcutter · 05-21-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

Law is a natural to move to free safety and could play in the NFL well into his mid/late 30's.

Do you do it for a 2? I think the Pats are playing hardball and holding for a 1.
This will play out in training camp.

I probably do it and try to get a 5 from the Pats in return.

If Law can get us at least 2 very good years at corner and 2 yrs at FS, it's a worthy investment. Think of all the 2nd round busts we had, not to mention around the league. Dillion went for a 2 and RB tend to hit the wall at 30. Law has a better chance than Dillion at performing in terms of longevity.

2nd rounder is reasonable. I know we all like to think of what we can get potentially with a 2nd but at the same that it comes with great risks.