
|
03-01-2011
|
#1
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Mid Atlantic |
Posts: | 27,093 |
|
UCLA S, Rahim Moore in the 2nd Round?
Despite his slower than expected 40 times do you think he'll be a good fit in the 2nd round? I would take him or Phil Taylor, thoughts?
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#2
|
|
Felis silvestris catus
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 5,065 |
|
I would love Moore in round 2.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#3
|
|
Pixel Pusher
Joined: | Aug 2007 |
Location: | New York, NY |
Posts: | 19,593 |
|
I thought Moore looked very good in the footwork drills, wouldn't mind him at all but I don't want to pass on a lineman to do so unless we address it in FA.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#4
|
|
Spider 2 Y-Banana
Years Donated 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Oct 2008 |
Location: | NOVA |
Posts: | 23,817 |
|
I would absolutely take him in the 2nd round.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#5
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2009 |
Location: | USA |
Posts: | 5,913 |
|
I think he plays soft - am much higher on D Williams
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#6
|
|
Less is more
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Location: | Taco Stand |
Posts: | 5,971 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeSportStar80
Despite his slower than expected 40 times do you think he'll be a good fit in the 2nd round? I would take him or Phil Taylor, thoughts?
|
He looked fantastic in the position drills, very smooth. I believe he has all the ability needed to make an impact in coverage early in his career. That said, he's going to miss a lot of tackles at the next level. Another concern I have is that as he puts on weight his speed will become more problematic. I want to like Moore, but I have too many reservations to advocate taking him early in the second round. If the safety class was stronger then I think Moore would be more of a third round candidate, at best.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#7
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Mid Atlantic |
Posts: | 27,093 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by masomenos
He looked fantastic in the position drills, very smooth. I believe he has all the ability needed to make an impact in coverage early in his career. That said, he's going to miss a lot of tackles at the next level. Another concern I have is that as he puts on weight his speed will become more problematic. I want to like Moore, but I have too many reservations to advocate taking him early in the second round. If the safety class was stronger then I think Moore would be more of a third round candidate, at best.
|
I wouldn't be shocked to see him go late in the 2nd round.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#8
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,256 |
|
He has great ball skills and I would take him with no hesitation at all.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Rancho Cucamonga |
Posts: | 1,457 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnoDallas
I think he plays soft - am much higher on D Williams
|
How many UCLA games did you watch last year?
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#10
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Mid Atlantic |
Posts: | 27,093 |
|
I like a FS with ball skills (no homo, lol), my question is would he be an immediate starter in Dallas. IF drafted in the 2nd round, I would hope so...
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2011 |
Location: | Cleveland, OH |
Posts: | 165 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeSportStar80
I like a FS with ball skills (no homo, lol), my question is would he be an immediate starter in Dallas. IF drafted in the 2nd round, I would hope so...
|
Did you see our secondary last year? He'd start immediately. Safety is a giant hole, and he's just about the only sure fire starter at safety. Some guys might go higher who could move there, but he already knows the position. It sure would be nice to add a starter at the top of round 2. It seems like a very safe pick, and we wouldn't have to worry about the position for a while. I'd take him if he's there.
|
|
|
03-01-2011
|
#12
|
|
28 Joker
Joined: | Apr 2007 |
Posts: | 7,878 |
|
He fits a big need, but I think there will be better players on the board in round 2 than him. I'd rather have Aaron Williams at DB or Curtis Brown. Curtis Marsh is another CB to watch. Interior offensive line should be in play...
For me, it just depends on who Dallas would pass up to draft him.
|
|
|
03-02-2011
|
#13
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 6,986 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 41gy#
He fits a big need, but I think there will be better players on the board in round 2 than him. I'd rather have Aaron Williams at DB or Curtis Brown. Curtis Marsh is another CB to watch. Interior offensive line should be in play...
For me, it just depends on who Dallas would pass up to draft him.
|
Agree on all counts.
|
|
|
03-02-2011
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | May 2005 |
Location: | WHITE SANDS NM |
Posts: | 38,213 |
|
this is where the classic BPA vs Need question comes in. to me if this guy fills the BIGGEST hole in our D from last year its just fine to use our 2nd on him.
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM
Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
|
|
|
03-02-2011
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 4,492 |
|
it is all about value
the drop off between him and a healthy D. williams is negligible
here is what i would do:
pick OL/CB/LB in 2nd (in place of moore)
trade down in 3 (gain extra 4th or 5th)
pick d. williams in late 3rd
much better value than picking moore in 2
it never ceases to amaze me that the same people *****ing and moaning about our OL all season are now talking about picking DBs with our top 2 picks (although i would not be surprised if JJ does exactly that).
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.
|