Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-20-2005   #1
Compacity
Banned
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
656
Happy Birthday Derrick Johnson Vs. Mike Williams Vs. Shawne Marrimen

People put your facts down which make these three players more of a contributer then each other and tell why would you choose them...

Derrick Johnson: A NICE BLITZER/BIG LINEBACKER
Mike Williams: BIG and tall Wide Receiver/ Acrobactic Catcher
Shawne Marrimen: Big Linebacker/ Is versitle between DE and Linebacker

I would take Mike Williams because in Dallas Cowboys case he could score touchdowns and be big down field threat, which we been missing since Michael Irvin..and M. Irvin even said hisself that Mike Williams should be a Cowboy...
Compacity is offline  

Old 03-20-2005   #2
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,296
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Compacity
People put your facts down which make these three players more of a contributer then each other and tell why would you choose them...

Derrick Johnson: A NICE BLITZER/BIG LINEBACKER
Mike Williams: BIG and tall Wide Receiver/ Acrobactic Catcher
Shawne Marrimen: Big Linebacker/ Is versatile between DE and Linebacker

I would take Mike Williams because in Dallas Cowboys case he could score touchdowns and be big down field threat, which we been missing since Michael Irvin..and M. Irvin even said hisself that Mike Williams should be a Cowboy...

Who say's Johnson is a "blitz/big linebacker?" I don't think he's either. If anything he has a reputation as a "run around the blocks" guy.

Merriman is versatile-- he probably won't do either well enough at the pro level.

I think it's Williams by default. He's put up big numbers.
MichaelWinicki is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #3
The30YardSlant
Banned
 
The30YardSlant's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
I'm on a boat
Posts:
24,279
Default

DJ > Merriman > Williams

Response from Hostile jocking Williams in 3...2...1...
The30YardSlant is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #4
StateCollegeCowboy
aka BostonCowboy
 
StateCollegeCowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2004
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
375
Default

If I had to choose between the three, it would be Mike Williams, but I doubt either of the three will be sitting at our #11 spot.
"If you are constantly looking in the past, you cannot see where you are headed in the future." - Me

"If you dress well, people notice the person. If you dress poorly, people notice the clothes." - Some fashion designer
StateCollegeCowboy is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #5
wick
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki
Who say's Johnson is a "blitz/big linebacker?" I don't think he's either. If anything he has a reputation as a "run around the blocks" guy.
Johnson wasn't used extensively as a blitzer, but it doesn't mean he can't do it. In fact, I think he'll be the best rush LB in this draft if that's how he's used in the pros. He's just a physical phenomenon whose talents directly translate onto the field, unlike a workout warrior like Merriman.
wick is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #6
ghettogandhi
Senior Member
 
ghettogandhi's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
maryland
Posts:
992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki
Who say's Johnson is a "blitz/big linebacker?" I don't think he's either. If anything he has a reputation as a "run around the blocks" guy.

Merriman is versatile-- he probably won't do either well enough at the pro level.

I think it's Williams by default. He's put up big numbers.
Mike - Merriman is a 3-4 star - the only one in this draft

As for Williams I love him- not as much as Hostile but I would love to be able to get him at 11

as for Derrick Johnson - if your the fastest guy on the field are you gonna engage with each defender in front of you or are you going to run past him and grab the ball carrier etc- the guy is the next Derrick Brooks-
Is that not good enough for you?

PS- every 4-3 outside backer would prefer to run around the blocker- thats what they are supposed to do most of the time-not get blocked etc
ghettogandhi is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #7
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

I like Merriman best.
He's the biggest and strongest period. I'd rate him the 5th or 6th best player in this class. He is a point of attack guy with good speed. Goes through people moreso than around them. Needs to settle in at OLB in a 3-4 to meet potential. Similar player to Terrell Suggs but bigger and with less pass rush skill. Should remind BP of Carl Banks.

DJ next. I'd rate him 10-15. He is not a blitzer but he might have that potential. He needs lots of work on form. Has excellent athleticism and as a finesse player is by far best of that bunch. Reminds me of Jessie Armstead a great deal.

MW 3rd.

I think all 3 are worthy of a mid 1st at worst. MW showed me alot in his workout. He looked alot more agile and smooth then he did as a sophomore at USC. He can jump and is a playmaker but he always has struck me as a Burress redux. I still worry about his eventual size. He's a big guy by nature and could be more an h-back type in two years. On most teams that wouldn't matter but we already have Witten and our WRs are old.

I think any of the 3 could start next year and help the team but Merriman would help them where BP wants most. With the new secondary set to man cover we need a pressure RDE or ROLB.
But I still don't know what any team saw Thursday night that would have made them comfortable with waiting a round or two for the offensive lineman they wanted. ---Todd McShay
We just converted half our LB to DL. We have a 30m starting DL, it better be pretty friggin good.
jterrell is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #8
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Compacity
Derrick Johnson Vs. Mike Williams Vs. Shawne Marrimen

People put your facts down which make these three players more of a contributer then each other and tell why would you choose them.
For me it depends on the Howard deal going thru or melting down.

I agree with BostonCowboy, all 3 will prolly be gone before we are on the clock.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is online now  
Old 03-20-2005   #9
Compacity
Banned
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
656
Quote:
Originally Posted by big dog cowboy
For me it depends on the Howard deal going thru or melting down.

I agree with BostonCowboy, all 3 will prolly be gone before we are on the clock.
I guess im the only one but I think that Darren Howard is overrated he's been injured like most of his short career and he's a high-priced D-End... don't think that Cowboys should get him he is poison....

We should trade La'Roi Glover and the 20th pick off to Indinapolis Colts for Dwight Feeney and their 1st Round.

or

We should trade La'Roi Glover to Jets for John Abraham and a draft choice and sign Chris Hovan who still is a free agent...
Compacity is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #10
Bobo
Senior Member
 
Bobo's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
911
Default

If chosing between those 3, it'd have to be DJ or Merriman if I was picking. I like MW, but the D needs more help IMO and D is still more important to winning championships than O.

If we went to a 3-4, it'd be Merriman. If we stayed 4-3, I'd put DJ at Will.
Bobo is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #11
Natedawg44
Senior Member
 
Natedawg44's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ohio
Posts:
2,598
Default

Merriman (20% chance of being there) > Williams (50% chance) > Johnson (75%) chance
I had an apartment and I had a neighbor, and whenever he would knock on my wall I knew he wanted me to turn my music down and that made me angry 'cause I like loud music... so when he knocked on the wall, I'd mess with his head. I'd say, "Go around! I cannot open the wall! I dunno if you have a doorknob on your side but over here there's nothin'. It's just flat."

Mitch Hedberg RIP
Natedawg44 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #12
hank2k
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Compacity
People put your facts down which make these three players more of a contributer then each other and tell why would you choose them...

Derrick Johnson: A NICE BLITZER/BIG LINEBACKER
Mike Williams: BIG and tall Wide Receiver/ Acrobactic Catcher
Shawne Marrimen: Big Linebacker/ Is versitle between DE and Linebacker

I would take Mike Williams because in Dallas Cowboys case he could score touchdowns and be big down field threat, which we been missing since Michael Irvin..and M. Irvin even said hisself that Mike Williams should be a Cowboy...

I dont think MW is a downfield threat with his speed. Wasnt his longest TD like 40 yds (his last yr of college ball)? And how many downfield threats are mentioned as being TE or HBack candidates?? But remembering all the problems we had in the red zone makes me think thats where he could really be of value to us. Vinnies lack of TD passes wasnt all his fault. Guys gotta get open down there too.
hank2k is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #13
The30YardSlant
Banned
 
The30YardSlant's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
I'm on a boat
Posts:
24,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natedawg44
Merriman (20% chance of being there) > Williams (50% chance) > Johnson (75%) chance


I think you have that backwards.....
The30YardSlant is offline  
Old 03-20-2005   #14
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Compacity
People put your facts down which make these three players more of a contributer then each other and tell why would you choose them...

Derrick Johnson: A NICE BLITZER/BIG LINEBACKER
Mike Williams: BIG and tall Wide Receiver/ Acrobactic Catcher
Shawne Marrimen: Big Linebacker/ Is versitle between DE and Linebacker

I would take Mike Williams because in Dallas Cowboys case he could score touchdowns and be big down field threat, which we been missing since Michael Irvin..and M. Irvin even said hisself that Mike Williams should be a Cowboy...
Well, they really wouldn't be our facts that we are putting down, just our opinions.

I think DJ has the best chance of being here, Mike Williams second, and Merriman the least chance of being here. Note that in saying that I am speculating on which is most likely to actually drop to us.

Merriman is the fastest riser of the 3 because of his freak like pro day numbers. He could climb someone's draft charts in a big time hurry. It happens every year and I won't be shocked.

LBs usually drop and DJ is a true LB, therefore most likely to drop.

Williams may drop because of the year off, but I think based on his potential alone he will go higher than a lot of people expect. Someone will get a great weapon. Hope it's us, but realistically I don't think it will be.
Hostile is online now  
Old 03-20-2005   #15
Natedawg44
Senior Member
 
Natedawg44's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ohio
Posts:
2,598
Default

We will see. Merriman is has extremely good chance of going at 3.
I had an apartment and I had a neighbor, and whenever he would knock on my wall I knew he wanted me to turn my music down and that made me angry 'cause I like loud music... so when he knocked on the wall, I'd mess with his head. I'd say, "Go around! I cannot open the wall! I dunno if you have a doorknob on your side but over here there's nothin'. It's just flat."

Mitch Hedberg RIP
Natedawg44 is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com