Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2005 Archives > 2005 Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 03-21-2005   #1
Charles
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,409
Default My Mock Draft Rds 1 thru. 4

Feel free to criticize and ridicule.

11th pick – Marcus Spears.
Last years red herring was Steven Jackson. This year its Shawne Merriman. Great athlete, great work-out warrior but is he really the best football player. Eramus James and Spears are much better football players. Marcus Spears is about 20 lbs heavier(300 plus lbs), just as agile and was recruited as a top TE coming out of college. Marcus Spears has a nose for the football (folks he was a top TE in high school), makes big plays and every time there’s a lose ball Spears seems to scoring a defensive TD. Parcells gets this years Kevin Williams. A big, agile and high character player. He is also versatile (played offense and defense in college). Parcells has visions of the next Richard Seymour.
I think Jerry Jones (after watching Kevin Williams and Dwayne Robertson) will do anything to make sure Parcells gets his guy this time…… Marcus Spears, thus his reluctance to part with Draft picks this year.



20th or higher – Heath Miller Possibly use the 2nd Rd. 42nd Overall Pick to move up
If Parcells is ever given a dose of sodium pentothal and asked which position he likes the most I believe it will be TE even though he played LB in College and is a defensive coach. The list is long Bravaro, Cross , Zeke, Mrosko, Ben Coates, Keith Byars (HB/TE), Kyle Brady, Fred Baxter etc. Not all great players, but guys who were exceptional TE/HB who were above average blockers and cause match-up problems in the passing game.
Witten, Campbell and Robinson are a solid group. The addition of Miller could possibly make it dominant. A 4th TE will cut ino the WR numbers, but Parcells has traditionally only used 4 WR. Usually the 4th and 5th WR are also exceptional Special team contributors. The addition of Miller could also strengthen the running game. Parcells loves using the 2 or 3 TE set throughout his coaching career. Miller could serve as a 3rd TE/ 5th WR early ion his career. The Al Groh connection makes this a possible pick for the Cowboys. Don’t be surprised if the Cowboys move up to get Heath Miller.



42nd or lower 2nd Rd (swap after trading up to get Heath Miller) – Maurice Clarett

In my opinion he was the best player on the field when the Buckeyes won the National title against a Hurricane team that produced a million defensive starters in the NFL. He chased down Sean freakin Taylor and stripped the ball on a key Buckeye Red zone INT. I don’t think the Cowboys are in the business of drafting priests. Character issues got us Ellis instead of Hall of fame bound Moss. Ironically I don’t see any fans whining about character when guys like Leonardo Carson can beat their significant other etc. It comes to opinion.
Clarett would be a great back-up RB if he lives up to his potential. He could even be better than Julius Jones as a inside the tackle runner. Clarett is a punishing RB after the run. He takes on defenders and finishes runs with attitude. I think he’ll be a Corey Dillon type RB. All the “character” fanatics didn’t want to touch Corey Dillon. Remember just my opinion.

3rd pick – Drew Henson.

Already ahead of schedule. A 2005 draft pick with a year and 2 offseasons of experience in Parcells system under his belt. Hopefully he develops. He looked even better than Alex Smith and Aaron Rodgers during his underwear Olympics/ pass against the wind work-out last off-season..

4th RD pick – Alvin Pearman.

A jack of all trades. RB/WR/Special teams ace. Aka “Troy Brown 2005”. Another AL Groh connection. Parcells is a creature of habit always goes back to the same drinking well. Richie Andersons replacement.

Last edited by Charles : 03-21-2005 at 10:10 AM.
Charles is offline  

Old 03-21-2005   #2
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,813
Default

If we take Heath Miller in the first round...I may have to ban you....just joking, or am I.

For the record NO HEATH MILLER IN THE FIRST ROUND.

Carry on.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #3
Charles
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt
If we take Heath Miller in the first round...I may have to ban you....just joking, or am I.

For the record NO HEATH MILLER IN THE FIRST ROUND.

Carry on.
No you wouldn't because I won't gloat. It would just be an educated guess.
Charles is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #4
BrAinPaiNt
Dark Days
 
BrAinPaiNt's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
56,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
No you wouldn't because I won't gloat. It would just be an educated guess.

I would not be shocked if we took a TE with what Bill has said in the past....however I would be shocked if we did so in the first round.

I think we may look at taking one on the second day but probably more of the mold of a blocking TE that could be in the mold of Campbell.


BrAinPaiNt is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #5
Charles
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt
I would not be shocked if we took a TE with what Bill has said in the past....however I would be shocked if we did so in the first round.

I think we may look at taking one on the second day but probably more of the mold of a blocking TE that could be in the mold of Campbell.
Most fans don't think the Cowboys will draft a TE because we have Witten and Campbell. Campbell isn't getting any younger. He is playing a very physical position and older players tend to get injured. If Miller is the best player available I doubt Parcells will pass because of Campbells presence.

I think he'd rather take the best overall TE in the draft than say the 4th or 5th WRs like Troy Williamson or Roddy White just because they need youth and speed. Miller will help out in more roles than either WR and has the potential to be a match-up nightmare like Witten who played HB/TE/WR and special teams.
Charles is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #6
Derinyar
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
1,718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
Most fans don't think the Cowboys will draft a TE because we have Witten and Campbell. Campbell isn't getting any younger. He is playing a very physical position and older players tend to get injured. If Miller is the best player available I doubt Parcells will pass because of Campbells presence.

I think he'd rather take the best overall TE in the draft than say the 4th or 5th WRs like Troy Williamson or Roddy White just because they need youth and speed. Miller will help out in more roles than either WR and has the potential to be a match-up nightmare like Witten who played HB/TE/WR and special teams.
We have too many holes to draft a player whos likely to be a back up in the 1st. The 5th WR is a better fit for us than the 1st TE. But more than that, we will likely take at least one LB in the first round.
Derinyar is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #7
Qwickdraw
Banned
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Location:
VA
Posts:
5,451
Default

Maurice Clarrett?
42nd pick?
Are you kidding me?
Dude, what are you smoking?
Can I have some?

You completely lost me after Spears.

Clarrett would be around long after that pick so why on Earth would we waste it on him?
Furthermore, I wouldn't give up an old pair of socks for that clown.

Finally, one of the ONLY spots on this team that has a clear cut ProBowl starter and high quality backup already is TE. Miller in the first round would be almost as big of waste as say... oh, I don't know... drafting Maurice Clarrett in the 2nd round.


-you said, "feel free to ridicule and criticise."

Last edited by Qwickdraw : 03-21-2005 at 10:49 AM.
Qwickdraw is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #8
playit12
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Location:
Springfield, VA
Posts:
795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
Most fans don't think the Cowboys will draft a TE because we have Witten and Campbell. Campbell isn't getting any younger. He is playing a very physical position and older players tend to get injured. If Miller is the best player available I doubt Parcells will pass because of Campbells presence.

I think he'd rather take the best overall TE in the draft than say the 4th or 5th WRs like Troy Williamson or Roddy White just because they need youth and speed. Miller will help out in more roles than either WR and has the potential to be a match-up nightmare like Witten who played HB/TE/WR and special teams.
Miller isn't a blocking force like Campbell. He is more of a pass catching vertical threat, so he'd be backing up Witten. I just don't see drafting into your strengths in the first round. Besides i think #20 is a little high for Miller. I'd rather see us grab a DT, LB, or RT. We can get good value at that spot in what is a much bigger need area. Then FS or WR in the second.
playit12 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #9
playit12
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Oct 2004
Location:
Springfield, VA
Posts:
795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwickdraw
Maurice Clarrett?
42nd pick?
Are you kidding me?
Dude, what are you smoking?
Can I have some?

You completely lost me after Spears.

Clarrett would be around long after that pick so why on Earth would we waste it on him?
Furthermore, I wouldn't give up an old pair of socks for that clown.

Finally, one of the ONLY spots on this team that has a clear cut ProBowl starter and high quality backup already is TE. Miller in the first round would be almost as big of waste as say... oh, I don't know... drafting Maurice Clarrett in the 2nd round.
I'll just go ahead and say that I agree with everything he just said.

I swear every new Mock that goes up is more ridiculous than the next.
playit12 is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #10
Charles
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derinyar
We have too many holes to draft a player whos likely to be a back up in the 1st. The 5th WR is a better fit for us than the 1st TE. But more than that, we will likely take at least one LB in the first round.
What gurrantees do you have that any other player selected will be a starter. None what so ever. Was Ben Watson considered a back-up to Danile Graham. Did the Eagles NOT select any DBs because they would be back-ups in their 1st season with Troy Vincent and Bobby Taylor starting.
Did the Rams pass on Steven Jackson because he wouldn't be starting his 1st year behind Faulk. Vince Woolfork was drafted but didn't start because of Keith Traylor. The Panthers took Deshaun Foster in the 2nd RD after giving Stephen Davis a fat contract. The Saints drafted Will Smith even though Darren Howard has atleast 4 to 5 seasons left.

I could go on and on. You always draft the best player regardless of need (Qb being the exception if you have a stud). Good players always find a way to get on the field and contribute.
Charles is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #11
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
 
Alexander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2005
Posts:
18,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
What gurrantees do you have that any other player selected will be a starter. None what so ever. Was Ben Watson considered a back-up to Danile Graham. Did the Eagles NOT select any DBs because they would be back-ups in their 1st season with Troy Vincent and Bobby Taylor starting.
Did the Rams pass on Steven Jackson because he wouldn't be starting his 1st year behind Faulk. Vince Woolfork was drafted but didn't start because of Keith Traylor. The Panthers took Deshaun Foster in the 2nd RD after giving Stephen Davis a fat contract. The Saints drafted Will Smith even though Darren Howard has atleast 4 to 5 seasons left.

I could go on and on. You always draft the best player regardless of need (Qb being the exception if you have a stud). Good players always find a way to get on the field and contribute.
I know everyone thinks you are crazy for the Heath Miller talk. One thing to hang you hat on is that he is dropping like a rock because he cannot work out since he has a sports hernia.

He might even make it to the late first round or even early second because of it.
Alexander is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #12
Charles
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwickdraw
Maurice Clarrett?
42nd pick?
Are you kidding me?
Dude, what are you smoking?
Can I have some?

You completely lost me after Spears.

Clarrett would be around long after that pick so why on Earth would we waste it on him?
Furthermore, I wouldn't give up an old pair of socks for that clown.
Thats your opinion. I don't think Clarett at the 42nd is a wasted pick. I think he has more upside than every RB in this draft IMHO.

What makes you think any other player is a lock. Gurode was a lock, Julius Jones looked like a bust in the making early in 2004 season. SO called "experts" and fans thought passing on Steven Jackson was bad move.

Quite frankly you are about a clueless as everyone else. I just have the balls to lay my opinion on line . Either way nobody really knows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwickdraw
Finally, one of the ONLY spots on this team that has a clear cut ProBowl starter and high quality backup already is TE. Miller in the first round would be almost as big of waste as say... oh, I don't know... drafting Maurice Clarrett in the 2nd round.


-you said, "feel free to ridicule and criticise."
The Eagles also had 3 Pro Bowl caliber players in the secondary in,2000 2001 and 2002 but it didn't stop the Eagles from drafting 3 DBs.

It goes both ways bro. I could find just as many teams that draft the best player available regardless of who is on the roster. I bet you most of those teams are the cream of the crop. Yes they don't have as many holes to fill but why should we settle for a lesser player to fill a hole. I'd rather have a secondary or unit full of Pro Bowl caliber players than have a selected player for need who turns out to be average see tghe Cowboys 1995-2002 draft philosophy.
Charles is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #13
Avery
The Dog that Saved Charleston
 
Avery's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Herriman, UT
Posts:
7,158
Default

Heath Miller is a good player and even though having two TE's to run Parcells dink and dunk offense would be nice, there's a lot of fish to fry on this team and Witten and Campbell are adequate.

Clarett won't go at #42 or in the first day my opinion. No football for two years, poor attitude at the combine, won't happen. Lots of players have talent in the league. I'll take one that doesn't have the baggage.
Avery is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #14
btcutter
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,263
Default

Mauice in the 2nd????????

Most scout won't even rate him for the draft because of the antics he pulled at the combine. I really don't care if you got all the talent in the world if you head isn't screwed on right, you are finished in football and life (please look at Ricky Williams). You think anyone is going to give up a 2nd rounder for Ricky now????

I really hope our draft doesn't look like this. It's sad
btcutter is offline  
Old 03-21-2005   #15
Charles
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
3,409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btcutter
Mauice in the 2nd????????

Most scout won't even rate him for the draft because of the antics he pulled at the combine. I really don't care if you got all the talent in the world if you head isn't screwed on right, you are finished in football and life (please look at Ricky Williams). You think anyone is going to give up a 2nd rounder for Ricky now????

I really hope our draft doesn't look like this. It's sad
I won't be surprised if most scouts don't rate Clarett.

Its naive to think they don'tm have an axe to grind. Clarett suing the NFL to allow players into the NFL doesn't bond well with the scouts who are making a living off the NFL minor league ooops I mean Collegiate football.

What the scouts can't ignore is Claretts productivity and playmaking ability on the field at Ohio State. Drew Henson gets more run/praise based on limited playing time in college even though his impact on the Wolverines doesn't even come close to Claretts presence for the Buckeyes. We all know Drew Henson was getting better at playing QB learning how to hit a curve ball and field ground balls. His upside like Clarett's should dictate where he goes, not his combine or attitude.

Last edited by Charles : 03-21-2005 at 11:41 AM.
Charles is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com