Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-23-2012   #1
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default Ryan Broyles

Ryan Broyles (WR from OU) suffered a season ending injury and will undoubtably fall in the draft as a result. His production in college is unquestionable. He will probably will not be able to participate in the physical part of the combine.

If he were healthy, I think he would make an ideal "slot" receiver for the Cowboys. He would probably be much like Carter in that he would have a limited impact in 2012 because he will not be fully healed. But we might get really good bang for the buck on him if we select him, which will be much lower than it would have been pre injury. He would have undoubtably had a first round grade before the injury.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-23-2012   #2
robert70x7
Senior Member
 
robert70x7's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
998
Default

I looked at him yesterday. Another option is Marquis Maze out of Alabama, they seem to be similar but Maze's numbers don't jump out like Broyles. After doing some research on him, I realized that he had some red flags in terms of some off field problems that I was surpsied to hear about.

I think the Cowboys need to re-sign Robinson and maybe give Radway one more shot to be the #4 guy this year. With the emergence of Welker over the past couple of years, all teams are definitely looking for someone in that mold.
robert70x7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #3
rkell87
Senior Member
 
rkell87's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2009
Location:
richardson,tx
Posts:
6,938
Default

i agree with everything except that he would have been a 1st rounder, there is no way. he would have had a shot in the second, most likely a third. you don't draft WR in the 1st or 2nd to be a slot, if teams thought he could play outside as a legit 2 he might have been in the 2nd. as it stands right now he is 6th-undrafted but can improve after medical evals

It is not the waitress's fault!
rkell87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #4
robert70x7
Senior Member
 
robert70x7's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
998
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkell87 View Post
i agree with everything except that he would have been a 1st rounder, there is no way. he would have had a shot in the second, most likely a third. you don't draft WR in the 1st or 2nd to be a slot, if teams thought he could play outside as a legit 2 he might have been in the 2nd. as it stands right now he is 6th-undrafted but can improve after medical evals
If he's there for the Cowboys at 6, I'm screaming if they don't take him. He'll stock will rise once teams realize that he's healthy. He'll go in the 4th-5th.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
It wouldn't have to be a first-round pick, and we will have free-agent money.
robert70x7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #5
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default Current estimates

One draft source has him listed as the 178th pick (5th round). Although he does not have blazing speed he always seems to get open, especially in critical situations and has great hands. He gets separation and would be an outstanding possession receiver, IMHO.

He reminds you a little bit of a Jerry Rice type of guy, more than Wes Welker, as he is not as sturdily built as Wes Welker, or Steve Smith (Panthers). I think he would be a steal, in the 4th or below.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #6
Risen Star
Senior Member
 
Risen Star's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2006
Posts:
14,779
Default

There is a zero percent chance that Broyles goes undrafted.

-


We'll settle this with a good dust up.
Risen Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #7
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default well,

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkell87 View Post
i agree with everything except that he would have been a 1st rounder, there is no way. he would have had a shot in the second, most likely a third. you don't draft WR in the 1st or 2nd to be a slot, if teams thought he could play outside as a legit 2 he might have been in the 2nd. as it stands right now he is 6th-undrafted but can improve after medical evals
I realize that sometimes college production doesn't equate to success on the pro level, but according to some statistics he is THE MOST prolific player in the HISTORY of college football. There is no way of knowing what round he would have been taken in, if healthy, but it is hard for me to fathom that he wouldn't have been a first rounder.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #8
rkell87
Senior Member
 
rkell87's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2009
Location:
richardson,tx
Posts:
6,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
I realize that sometimes college production doesn't equate to success on the pro level, but according to some statistics he is THE MOST prolific player in the HISTORY of college football. There is no way of knowing what round he would have been taken in, if healthy, but it is hard for me to fathom that he wouldn't have been a first rounder.




these are the only guys under 6' to be taken in round one since 1980, you will notice that(especially recently) most of the guys on that list make up for their height in speed and broyles doesn't have that. you also notice that many of the guys on the list have under preformed for the spot they were drafted in. again, there was no way he was going in the first and I didn't even hear talk of him being regarded as a first rounder before he was injured.

if he proves healthy in march he will go 4-5 range and if his rehab isn't as far along as teams would like he will go lower

It is not the waitress's fault!

Last edited by rkell87 : 01-23-2012 at 12:57 PM.
rkell87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #9
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkell87 View Post




these are the only guys under 6' to be taken in round one since 1980, you will notice that(especially recently) most of the guys on that list make up for their height in speed and broyles doesn't have that. you also notice that many of the guys on the list have under preformed for the spot they were drafted in. again, there was no way he was going in the first and I didn't even hear talk of him being regarded as a first rounder before he was injured.

if he proves healthy in march he will go 4-5 range and if his rehab isn't as far along as teams would like he will go lower

What were Jerry Rice's measurables, and how did drafting him work out for the 49'ers?
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #10
tm1119
Senior Member
 
tm1119's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2006
Posts:
1,454
Default

Really depends on whether Robinson is back or not(I think he will be). If Robinson is back then the only way I take a WR if that person is also a prolific KR/PR guy.
tm1119 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #11
joseephuss
Senior Member
 
joseephuss's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
17,951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
What were Jerry Rice's measurables, and how did drafting him work out for the 49'ers?
Jerry Rice was 6'-2", which is taller than every guy on that list.

Broyles is good. I think he is better than other OU products who have entered the NFL over the last several years. He is more than a product of the system although that system is partially why is numbers are so prolific. I didn't see him as a 1st round talent before the injury. He will drop due to that injury. Dallas does not need to draft him unless he is the best player available and there are no other close options. I think there will be some good options available in every round for Dallas.
joseephuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #12
rkell87
Senior Member
 
rkell87's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2009
Location:
richardson,tx
Posts:
6,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
What were Jerry Rice's measurables, and how did drafting him work out for the 49'ers?
lol that kinda back fired on ya, yeah?


it's ok man, he is good, he may even end up one of the better WR of this class when all is said and done, but he wasn't going to be picked in round 1, and that is ok, plenty of good WRs that were 2nd round talent.

It is not the waitress's fault!
rkell87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #13
batman36
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tm1119 View Post
Really depends on whether Robinson is back or not(I think he will be). If Robinson is back then the only way I take a WR if that person is also a prolific KR/PR guy.


Broyles was a dynamic punt returner at OU. If he is healthy, I'd like to see him in Dallas. I've watched a lot of games in Norman, OK. over the years, and Broyles is one of the most electrifying players I've ever seen as a Sooner.
batman36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #14
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default not my point .....

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkell87 View Post
lol that kinda back fired on ya, yeah?


it's ok man, he is good, he may even end up one of the better WR of this class when all is said and done, but he wasn't going to be picked in round 1, and that is ok, plenty of good WRs that were 2nd round talent.

I was referring more to Rice's build and speed. Rice didn't have blazing speed, and was more slightly built than Welker or Steve Smith. I never really considered Rice's height to be much of an issue because his routes were so precise and crisp that he was usually "open".
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012   #15
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,713
Default True ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by joseephuss View Post
Jerry Rice was 6'-2", which is taller than every guy on that list.

Broyles is good. I think he is better than other OU products who have entered the NFL over the last several years. He is more than a product of the system although that system is partially why is numbers are so prolific. I didn't see him as a 1st round talent before the injury. He will drop due to that injury. Dallas does not need to draft him unless he is the best player available and there are no other close options. I think there will be some good options available in every round for Dallas.
It is true that OU WR's numbers are partially due to the system, but much like DeMarco Murry the year before .... OU was much less prolific on offense without Broyles.... They didn't look like the same team.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com