
|
02-05-2012
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
DeCastro at 14 is stupid
I, like many people on here, have had DeCastro very high up on my wish list. However, the reality of the situation is that this class of guards is incredibly deep. Strategically, it makes absolutely zero sense to use a first round pick on a hole that can EASILY be filled in rounds 2, 3, or even 4.
Quick mock
Brockers
Boykin
Osemele
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2006 |
Posts: | 1,454 |
|
1st, DeCastro is head and shoulders above the rest of the guards. 2nd, what guard do u see past the 2nd that can start right away? DeCastro, Glenn, Zeitler, and Washington, and Osemele are the only 1's I see starting from day 1 right away. Anyone else is a stretch and a gamble.
Plus the CB class is way deeper than the guards. So by your logic we shouldn't draft 1 of those either. So who's left at 14? Ingram or Upshaw only? No thanks to Upshaw and I doubt Ingram lasts.
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tm1119
1st, DeCastro is head and shoulders above the rest of the guards. 2nd, what guard do u see past the 2nd that can start right away? DeCastro, Glenn, Zeitler, and Washington, and Osemele are the only 1's I see starting from day 1 right away. Anyone else is a stretch and a gamble.
Plus the CB class is way deeper than the guards. So by your logic we shouldn't draft 1 of those either. So who's left at 14? Ingram or Upshaw only? No thanks to Upshaw and I doubt Ingram lasts.
|
I agree that the CB class is also incredibly deep. If possible I would rather wait til round 2 to select a CB..see my mock above. However, CB is a much more important position than guard...because of this, CBs come off the board at a much higher rate than guards
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#4
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 6,986 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
I, like many people on here, have had DeCastro very high up on my wish list. However, the reality of the situation is that this class of guards is incredibly deep. Strategically, it makes absolutely zero sense to use a first round pick on a hole that can EASILY be filled in rounds 2, 3, or even 4.
Quick mock
Brockers
Boykin
Osemele
|
DeCastro is clearly the best OG in the class by a wide margin. He's a legitimate blue-chip prospect. If I have a shot at the best prospect at any position at #14, I'm going to consider it heavily.
It's like the 2007 Vikings saying "meh, why are we gonna use the #7 overall pick on Adrian Peterson, this is a deep running back class?"
Also, guys like Glenn and Osemele (both guys I do like) are both projections at this point having played OT in college. DeCastro is a proven prospect at the position.
Last edited by realtick : 02-05-2012 at 10:21 AM.
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
Simatolu can easily be a day 1 starter.. And Jeff Allen is also a possibility
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#6
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 6,986 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
Simatolu can easily be a day 1 starter.. And Jeff Allen is also a possibility
|
Did you mean Amini Silatolu?
And you're really confident Silatolu who played left tackle at Midwestern State is ready to step into the NFL and start at a new position....day 1?
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Posts: | 14,779 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tm1119
1st, DeCastro is head and shoulders above the rest of the guards. 2nd, what guard do u see past the 2nd that can start right away? DeCastro, Glenn, Zeitler, and Washington, and Osemele are the only 1's I see starting from day 1 right away. Anyone else is a stretch and a gamble.
Plus the CB class is way deeper than the guards. So by your logic we shouldn't draft 1 of those either. So who's left at 14? Ingram or Upshaw only? No thanks to Upshaw and I doubt Ingram lasts.
|
The CB class is always deep. A dime gets you a dozen.
-
We'll settle this with a good dust up.
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by realtick
Did you mean Amini Silatolu?
And you're really confident Silatolu who played left tackle at Midwestern State is ready to step into the NFL and start at a new position....day 1?
|
Yes, I did mean Silatolu..stupid iPhone, lol..
And yes, I think so..many places have him lasted as a top 4-5 guard in this class..
Also forgot about Brandon Brooks..this class is super deep
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#9
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 6,986 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryDaysRBack
Yes, I did mean Silatolu..stupid iPhone, lol..
And yes, I think so..many places have him lasted as a top 4-5 guard in this class..
|
Trust me, I've written some strange things on my iPhone too. This websites pretty funny: http://damnyouautocorrect.com/
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
Brockers is #1 on my list!
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Austin, TX |
Posts: | 2,035 |
|
Give me the t. smith of OG this draft and plug them together for the next 10 years and we all will be pleased with the results.
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2004 |
Posts: | 1,340 |
|
Give me the following and I'll be happy
DeCastro in the 1st Round
Minnifield in the 2nd Round
and trade up from the 3rd Round and there
will be some sliders there hopefully Vinny Curry
is one !!!
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#13
|
|
"You Want Some?"
Years Donated 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Olean, New York |
Posts: | 27,301 |
|
Reason's why DeCastro over Brockers...
1. DeCastro is clearly the best guard in this draft. Brockers may not be the best 3-4 DE prospect.
2. DeCastro's body of work throughout his college career is much more impressive than Brockers.
3. Arkin, Nagy, Kowalski– the other guard options on the team. Coleman, Spears, Hatcher, Lissmore– the other DE options. Which group is worse?
4. Jay Ratliff played the most snaps on the DL–750. A starting guard will get 1,000 snaps or more.
The one thing in Brocker's favor is that he could have a bigger high-side to his game.
The emphasis should be on "could". He could also end up being another Marcus Spears, which is OK, but not a good option if you've given up DeCastro.
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#14
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 6,986 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyv
DeCastro in the 1st Round
Minnifield in the 2nd Round
and trade up from the 3rd Round and there
will be some sliders there hopefully Vinny Curry
is one !!!
|
Like the way you're thinking, but I would much rather go:
DeCastro - 1st round
Curry - 2nd round
Boykin - 3rd round
|
|
|
02-05-2012
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 8,097 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki
Reason's why DeCastro over Brockers...
1. DeCastro is clearly the best guard in this draft. Brockers may not be the best 3-4 DE prospect.
2. DeCastro's body of work throughout his college career is much more impressive than Brockers.
3. Arkin, Nagy, Kowalski– the other guard options on the team. Coleman, Spears, Hatcher, Lissmore– the other DE options. Which group is worse?
4. Jay Ratliff played the most snaps on the DL–750. A starting guard will get 1,000 snaps or more.
The one thing in Brocker's favor is that he could have a bigger high-side to his game.
The emphasis should be on "could". He could also end up being another Marcus Spears, which is OK, but not a good option if you've given up DeCastro.
|
I'm going to argue that our guards are jut as good.. Not better, but just as good as our DEs..we probably have more depth at DE, but it's a bunch of depth that is full of mediocre play. Our ends flat at do not do enough in regards to collapsing the pocket..like literally, nothing..I will call the needs a wash, the DEs get the premium pick bc this class of guards is so strong..w that said, that's only if Brockers is available. Im not suggesting we reach for a diff DE just bc. I believe Brockers is definitely worthy of our 14th pick
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.
|