 |
|
|||||||
|
Cowboys Chat:
0 user(s) online
|
|
|
|
Home
|
Fan Zone
|
News Zone
|
Draft Zone
|
Off-topic Zone
|
Forum Rules
|
Chat
|
** Change Graphics **
|
|
|
Display Modes | Thread Tools |
04-05-2005
|
#1 | ||||||
|
Senior Member
|
Which one would you pick......
[font=Times New Roman]Which would you rather have?[/font]
[font=Times New Roman]Either of these could be a real possibility.[/font] [font=Times New Roman]Pick #11 Mike Williams[/font] [font=Times New Roman]Pick #20 Dave Pollack[/font] [font=Times New Roman]Or[/font] [font=Times New Roman]Pick #11 Shawn Merriman[/font] [font=Times New Roman]Pick #20Mark Clayton[/font] Last edited by JBond : 04-05-2005 at 11:28 PM. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
04-05-2005
|
#2 | ||||||
|
Banned
|
Merriman and Clayton.
|
||||||
|
|
|
04-05-2005
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Insulin Beware
Years Donated 2005, 2006
|
Merriman and Clayton. I have reservations about Williams.
|
||||||
|
|
04-05-2005
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Years Donated 2005, 2008
 |
Merriman, Clayton at 20
Just so you know we have pick 20 not 21 simple mistake..... 
|
||||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#5 | ||||
|
Senior Member
|
Williams and Pollack, it's not even close IMO.
|
||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#6 | |||||||
|
Federal Agent
Years Donated 2005
|
Quote:
Well... considering Pollack is a better DE/OLB then Merriman and MW is the best WR in the draft... yeah I'll got with MW and DP.  |
|||||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#7 | ||||||
|
Senior Member
|
Williams and anybody at #20....
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
"We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time." |
||||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Senior Member
 |
No brainer!
#11 Pollack #20 Clayton Only an idiot would draft Merriman over Pollack. We need play makers and I don't remeber many highlights of Merriman changing the out come of a big game (or any game) on ESPN..Get real, if we pass on Pollack at 11 (if he's there), then really don't know how to draft...Playermakers only need apply.
"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much for so long with so little, that we are now qualified to do anything with nothing."
Anonymous, but classic.... Cowboys fan since 1972.... |
||||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Forum Architect
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
 |
I really want to like Merriman. Something just screams bust to me about this guy.
He's a physical specimen on paper, but why was he never truly dominant in college? I'm gunshy about players like him. Don't get me wrong, there's a lot to worry about with Pollack as well. But Merriman is the higher touted player, and I'm just not convinced it's justified. Pollack outperformed Merriman his entire collegiate career and is nearly as good an athlete on paper. Why is Merriman now considered so much better? I like both Mike Williams and Mark Clayton. Two entirely different receivers, but guys who are football players and not just paper specimens. Slap me if I'm misguided, but Williamson strikes me as the Merriman of wide receivers. |
||||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#10 | ||||||
|
94
 Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
|
Williams/Pollack but it'll never happen.
  There is no formula for success except an unconditional acceptance of life and what it brings. |
||||||
|
|
|
04-06-2005
|
#11 | ||||||
|
Papa
|
It depends...
It would depend on whether we go through with the Howard trade or not.
If we do then we can go with Williams and Pollack. If not then we need a DE and that means Merriman and Clayton. Either way I would be happy. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.