Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2012   #1
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default Orson Charles and Phillip Blake

This is who I've settled on for tonight. It might change by tomorrow. I don't know if I can wait another 10 hours
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 04-28-2012   #2
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

Im with you on Charles, but I really don't see the point in Phillip Blake. He's not ready to play right away, and we already got more project interior OL than we know what to do with and he'll be a year behind them. There's no point in drafting an interior OL just for the sake of saying you drafted an interior OL.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #3
a_minimalist
Senior Member
 
a_minimalist's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
Earth
Posts:
4,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
Im with you on Charles, but I really don't see the point in Phillip Blake. He's not ready to play right away, and we already got more project interior OL than we know what to do with and he'll be a year behind them. There's no point in drafting an interior OL just for the sake of saying you drafted an interior OL.
That's a very good point!!!
a_minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #4
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
Im with you on Charles, but I really don't see the point in Phillip Blake. He's not ready to play right away, and we already got more project interior OL than we know what to do with and he'll be a year behind them. There's no point in drafting an interior OL just for the sake of saying you drafted an interior OL.
You don't think he can beat out Costa or Kowalski? I mean, if we can get a starting OC and Nagy/Arkin/Livings/Bernadeau fight it out for the OG positions, then I think we have a pretty good OL going into this season.
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #5
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamziD View Post
You don't think he can beat out Costa or Kowalski? I mean, if we can get a starting OC and Nagy/Arkin/Livings/Bernadeau fight it out for the OG positions, then I think we have a pretty good OL going into this season.
No, I really don't think he can beat out Costa or Kowalski (and Nagy and Arkin are competing for a spot there). It's a horrible, horrible, horrible center draft. Aside from Konz, there was nobody ready to step in and play Day 1. So when a guy can't even crack the 3rd round in a draft when teams are looking high and low for anyone who can play the position, that should tell you something bout what he is.

Throw in the fact that he'll be coming in from a college spead offense and will have to adjust to playing pro style ball (Danny Watkins struggled horribly last year), throw in the fact that he's one or two years behind those guys in NFL strength and conditioning and learning the Cowboys offense, and throw in the fact that he's got the reputation of being lazy and not a self starter .... I see a guy who has a good chance to be a training camp cut due to a numbers game.

Im with you on Charles .. he can make the roster as a 2nd/3rd TE and would be good value there.

Last edited by InmanRoshi : 04-28-2012 at 01:12 AM.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #6
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
No, I really don't think he can beat out Costa or Kowalski (and Nagy and Arkin are competing for a spot there). It's a horrible, horrible, horrible center draft. Aside from Konz, there was nobody ready to step in and play Day 1. So when a guy can't even crack the 3rd round in a draft when teams are looking high and low for anyone who can play the position, that should tell you something bout what he is.

Throw in the fact that he'll be coming in from a college spead offense and will have to adjust to playing pro style ball (Danny Watkins struggled horribly last year), throw in the fact that he's one or two years behind those guys in NFL strength and conditioning and learning the Cowboys offense, and throw in the fact that he's got the reputation of being lazy and not a self starter .... I see a guy who has a good chance to be a training camp cut due to a numbers game.
Solid points. I don't claim to be anywhere near a draft expert. I just go by what I read from reputable posters on this forum and scouting sites. The point is, I think everyone can agree that we need an upgrade at OC. If the Cowboys already have a plan for that which doesn't include using a draft pick on one, then that's fine.
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #7
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default

Yeah, the Charles pick seems to make perfect sense. We obviously love using 2 TE sets and Charles is effective in both the passing game and at blocking. This helps out our OL and, ultimately, Tony Romo. Win-win.
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #8
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamziD View Post
Solid points. I don't claim to be anywhere near a draft expert. I just go by what I read from reputable posters on this forum and scouting sites. The point is, I think everyone can agree that we need an upgrade at OC. If the Cowboys already have a plan for that which doesn't include using a draft pick on one, then that's fine.
I'm for an upgrade over OC, but unfortunately the pickens were slim this year. I think everyone in this draft after the 2nd round is pretty much the equivalent of what we already have. In business project management you learn just throwing bodies at a problem doesn't solve it. It's like getting 9 different women pregnant hoping you can get a baby in a month.

The best chance for an upgrade is for someone in house to take a huge stride and claim the job away from Costa. Callahan should have no sentimental favorites or pet cats among this bunch considering he didn't bring them in, so let the best man win.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #9
AbeBeta
Senior Member
 
AbeBeta's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
23,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamziD View Post
This is who I've settled on for tonight. It might change by tomorrow. I don't know if I can wait another 10 hours
Charles is not a great blocker. I expect we look blocker first. He's more a decent receiver who needs to improve his blocking. He's a good pick but not really for us. We don't need more guys who need to get the ball.

I'm feeling more of a Macey Brooks/Wane McGarity pick for the first 4th, followed by a near miss on a center then a reach for a Derrick Lassic type
AbeBeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #10
Idgit
The Instant Classic
 
Idgit's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Moar leadership!
Posts:
20,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InmanRoshi View Post
No, I really don't think he can beat out Costa or Kowalski (and Nagy and Arkin are competing for a spot there). It's a horrible, horrible, horrible center draft. Aside from Konz, there was nobody ready to step in and play Day 1. So when a guy can't even crack the 3rd round in a draft when teams are looking high and low for anyone who can play the position, that should tell you something bout what he is.

Throw in the fact that he'll be coming in from a college spead offense and will have to adjust to playing pro style ball (Danny Watkins struggled horribly last year), throw in the fact that he's one or two years behind those guys in NFL strength and conditioning and learning the Cowboys offense, and throw in the fact that he's got the reputation of being lazy and not a self starter .... I see a guy who has a good chance to be a training camp cut due to a numbers game.

[View Full Quote]
Blake would immediately challenge for a starting job in Dallas. He's one of the top 3 players at his position and was slated to go in between the third and fourth rounds. I haven't heard anything about him having a reputation for being lazy, either. Just a good pass-blocker and someone who's going to need to develop more strength at the next level.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
Idgit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #11
theogt
Surrealist
 
theogt's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Posts:
43,252
Default

Yes, there's absolutely no doubt that Blake would immediately start in Dallas. Go back and watch every single RGIII video (if you can stomach it -- because he's good and will cause us problems for years). Blake is a legit week 1 starter.
theogt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #12
SaltwaterServr
Blank Paper Offends Me
 
SaltwaterServr's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2009
Location:
Digne, France
Posts:
8,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theogt View Post
Yes, there's absolutely no doubt that Blake would immediately start in Dallas. Go back and watch every single RGIII video (if you can stomach it -- because he's good and will cause us problems for years). Blake is a legit week 1 starter.
Gotta go with you on this one. Blake's been my pet cat since Konz got picked up.

On a side note, has anyone looked at what Pittsburgh interior OL looks like now? They could be a nasty bunch.
SaltwaterServr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #13
RamziD
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,486
Default

You can add on to my list Tank Carder, Jarius Wright, and Braylon Broughton in rounds 5-7.
RamziD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #14
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

I like Blake, but I agree that Watkins struggles last year are a little concerning. Then again, he did move from LT to G. Blake, obviously, stays at C. So it's a different scenario.

Would like Charles in this round too.
Gaede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2012   #15
silverbear
Semi-Official Loose Cannon
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jul 2004
Posts:
24,177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamziD View Post
This is who I've settled on for tonight. It might change by tomorrow. I don't know if I can wait another 10 hours
Not a bad call, though there are some tight ends in the 5th and 6th round range I like as well...

Lardarius Green, Louisiana-Lafayette... poor man's Jay Novacek, likely 4th round pick...

Rhett Ellison, USC... loaded with all kinds of intangibles that Garrett likes, he'll go in the 5th or 6th round...

Taylor Thompson, SMU... converting from DE, he intrigues me a lot... solid 6th round prospect...

James Hanna, Oklahoma... I hate drafting Sooners, but he has stretch the field ability... another likely 6th rounder...

Derek Carrier, Beloit... played WR in college, will make the big jump to TE and the NFL... a 7th round prospect...

Garrett Celek, Michigan State... the younger brother of Eagles' TE Brent Celek... another 7th rounder...

With this wealth of talent at TE available later, I think I'd wait to draft my TE... instead, I'd either look at NT Hebron Fangupo from BYU (since all the critics of the Crawford pick are whining about how we desperately need a NT), or one of the linebackers who might be on the board-- ILB James-Michael Johnson from Nevada, OLB Keenan Robinson from Texas, OLB Cam Johnson from Virginia, or OLB Jonathon Massaquoi from Troy...
Smarter than the av-er-age bear...
silverbear is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com