My first & last 3-4 thread... - Page 3 - Dallas Cowboys Forum

**ABQCOWBOY** · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by InmanRoshi

And started a rookie Jason Babin for all 16 games at OLB, who was strictly a hand on the ground DE in college ... for a small university, no less.

This is a valid point but I also think it's fair to mention the fact that Babin was the 27th pick in the first round as opposed to something as high as 11.

Dough Boy · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY

OK, give me a minute. Let me just get my speed dial hooked up to Mrs Cleo. I'll have an answer for you in a minute............................................ .................................................. ........................... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Everything looks easy when you view things through the eyes of a child. Everything in big block format and primary colors. Your asking me, who did not start this thread, to answer a question I have no info on instead of going off of what Dom Capers apparently said himself. They are his thoughts, his words, you should probably go to the source. But then, you may find out the real answer and if it doesn't agree with your view, that's gonna piss you right off.

You are not worth chicken fighting with there Dough Boy. Do your own research.

You'd lose the chicken fight. Good idea to back down Cowboy.... You popped of with the smart arese remark. My thread was not even directed at you, but you being you wanted to come with your typical M.O. Lets do this, when I'm not speaking to you directly, don't reply to me. Let someone else answer my question. For this, I will stay off your street. Deal

blindzebra · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rack

You really need to chill out. Keep that s*** up and I'll make sure we both get banned, a******.

Just how can you make me get banned?

I'm not the one name calling.

I'm not the one bypassing the language filter with the old *.

I'm not the one challenging every post being made by the other and going from discussion to flame war in one post.

It is LAUGHABLE.

**ABQCOWBOY** · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dough Boy

You'd lose the chicken fight. Good idea to back down Cowboy.... You popped of with the smart arese remark. My thread was not even directed at you, but you being you wanted to come with your typical M.O. Lets do this, when I'm not speaking to you directly, don't reply to me. Let someone else answer my question. For this, I will stay off your street. Deal

What ever man. Your so full of Bullshyt you don't even make sense. Review the thread. You asked a question and I happened to know the answer.

What part of, "Casserly was the GM at Washington where they ran a 43 and then went to Houston where they ran a 34" is devicive? You asked the question, I knew the answer of the top of my head. Sorry, I didn't get that it was ment to be retorical. You should warn us when you don't want us to answer your questions son.

You should check yourself, your insecurity is showing.

So let me get this straight, you don't want me to answer any of your questions or respond to any of your posts, that right? No thanks. This is not my street, as you put it. If you don't like me or want to hear from me, just add me to your ignor list. It's much easier then doing this whole drama queen thing.

Review your posts then come back and let me know who is acting like a here.

**ABQCOWBOY** · 04-15-2005

This was actually a really good post and it's managed to go down the tubs. I'm sure I have some responsability in that but let me just say Sorry to Mike who orignially posted this thing. Was some good thought here.

With that, I see this headed to the Smack board. Sooner the better probably.

Nors · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rack

You really need to chill out. Keep that s*** up and I'll make sure we both get banned, a******.

He's not worth it Rack - dude is a lost cause.

He'd argue with a rock and lose.

**MichaelWinicki** · 04-15-2005

OH YOU GUYS!

I guess that just goes to show you how volatile the whole subject is.

But it's one worth debating so let's see if we can go forward...

**MichaelWinicki** · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

He's not worth it Rack - dude is a lost cause.

He'd argue with a rock and lose.

Nors, you're not helping any.

Nors · 04-15-2005

BlindZebra flames out yet another football discusion.

Surprise, Surprise

**MichaelWinicki** · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

BlindZebra flames out yet another football discusion.

Surprise, Surprise

Thanks Nors... much appreciated.

Nors · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki

Nors, you're not helping any.

This is great Mikey. Now that Blindzebra has NORS on ignore he's lashing out at everybody. I think he is disorientated!

My money is on the 3-4 on topic.

Hostile · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

Also noted we started the 3-4 transition last year. Players are being added that fit both. Jeff Ireland and JJ as much said thats what they are looking for in draft. We floundered in our undersized passive 4-3 defense last year . Great idea - lets stick with that!

I think if you ever acknowledge that the problems on defense are about personnel as opposed to a scheme that I will spend the next week repenting because the world is about to end.

Our struggles on defense last year and in previous years has nothing to do with scheme and everything to do with the personnel on the field.

By all means keep blaming the scheme though.

**MichaelWinicki** · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hostile

I think if you ever acknowledge that the problems on defense are about personnel as opposed to a scheme that I will spend the next week repenting because the world is about to end.

Our struggles on defense last year and in previous years has nothing to do with scheme and everything to do with the personnel on the field.

By all means keep blaming the scheme though.

Exactly. And now we're going to "shoe-horn" guys into positions and somehow believe that we'll have a better defense because of it. Sure.

**MichaelWinicki** · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nors

This is great Mikey. Now that Blindzebra has NORS on ignore he's lashing out at everybody. I think he is disorientated!

My money is on the 3-4 on topic.

Nors don't you have a "Pryce/Howard" thread to start?

StonetheCrow77 · 04-15-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hostile

I think if you ever acknowledge that the problems on defense are about personnel as opposed to a scheme that I will spend the next week repenting because the world is about to end.

Our struggles on defense last year and in previous years has nothing to do with scheme and everything to do with the personnel on the field.

By all means keep blaming the scheme though.

I think it's more a matter of Parcell's being comfortable with the 3-4... Personally, I agree with you... some of the players need to upgraded and they should just stick to the 4-3... but, my opinion doesn't hold water, unfortunately...