Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2012   #1
THEHEREAFTER
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Sep 2004
Location:
Charlotte, NC
Posts:
2,370
Default 3rd & Long: Rush 3, Drop 8, Soft Zone!??

First off.. gutty win. We needed it and the D buckled down for the most part in the second half.

Look, I'm not claiming to know more than Rob Ryan but what's with this tendency on third and long? I understand mixing up coverages and looks based on down and distance but he really frustrates me by going to this look far too often imo. Am I the only one who sees this? We typically get picked apart far too often (see the first Ben Watson TD.. perhaps the second)

Wasn't the idea behind bringing in a Carr, paying Scandrick and moving up for Clayborne.. to lock down in man allowing the front 7 to put pressure on the qb? Furthermore as good as we "can be" at times on D is it me or are we caught way to often not lined up properly/disorganized etc..

Not necessarily griping here, I just expect so much more from our D. Thoughts?
THEHEREAFTER is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-18-2012   #2
Bizwah
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
5,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THEHEREAFTER View Post
First off.. gutty win. We needed it and the D buckled down for the most part in the second half.

Look, I'm not claiming to know more than Rob Ryan but what's with this tendency on third and long? I understand mixing up coverages and looks based on down and distance but he really frustrates me by going to this look far too often imo. Am I the only one who sees this? We typically get picked apart far too often (see the first Ben Watson TD.. perhaps the second)

Wasn't the idea behind bringing in a Carr, paying Scandrick and moving up for Clayborne.. to lock down in man allowing the front 7 to put pressure on the qb? Furthermore as good as we "can be" at times on D is it me or are we caught way to often not lined up properly/disorganized etc..

Not necessarily griping here, I just expect so much more from our D. Thoughts?
I feel the same way. Third and long makes me nervous.

We really play it safe against rookies. We hardly went after Russell Wilson. We seemed to play it soft against Foles. Today, we hardly blitzed against Weeden. I expect we'll see more of the same vs RGIII.

I also noticed we were playing a lot of 43 in the second half.

I really liked that look.
Bizwah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012   #3
rocyaice
Senior Member
 
rocyaice's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Posts:
4,421
Default

You know what's funny or sad is that when we are on 3rd down and blitz everyone it usually ends up in a incompletion. But when we drop everyone back in coverage it usually leads to a completion. The coaches have to see this.
rocyaice is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com