Without Dez Bryant, the Dallas Cowboys wouldn't have a chance.

[perrykemp]

Originally Posted by Risen Star

I think it's just a case of severely limiting the teams that qualify. You're talking about 3 teams max. The odds of one of the 3 winning a Super Bowl over the last 10 years are probably pretty long.

When's the last time one of the top 2 or 3 RBs in the league won a Super Bowl? You'd probably have to go all the way back to that same Rams team with Marshall Faulk.

Good point on RBs.

What you can say is that top 1-3 ranked QBs are the rule as opposed to the exception when it comes to Superbowls -- Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Warner when he won it, Peyton Manning, etc.

[Future]

Originally Posted by Risen Star

I think it's just a case of severely limiting the teams that qualify. You're talking about 3 teams max. The odds of one of the 3 winning a Super Bowl over the last 10 years are probably pretty long.

When's the last time one of the top 2 or 3 RBs in the league won a Super Bowl? You'd probably have to go all the way back to that same Rams team with Marshall Faulk.

Good point...I think Jamal Lewis was pretty outstanding for Bal the next year as well though.

[Stryker44]

Originally Posted by The Quest for Six

Murray and Witten are more important than Dez, Witten helps the running game with his blocking, moves the chains and keeps drives alive.....Murray helps the running game and brings balance in the offense

you sound like you have a crush on Dez, Dez isn't the end all be all YET!!! Has a long way to go before he's elite....doesn't grasp the playbook...so the organization had to limit the routes he runs....three years and still doesn't grasp the playbook is inexcuseable as far as I'm concerned..

The threat of Murray and Witten definitely keeps defenses honest. Its very much a "pick your poison" type deal.

[MissouriCowboy]

Originally Posted by Clove

I get the feeling you really really like Dez Bryant. This is like your 4th thread on him this week. Great article.

I do. In fact I defended this guy more than I have than Romo from Chief fans.

[JBell523]

Originally Posted by perrykemp

I agree with you that all those team had WRs were were established top 5-10 WRs in the NFL. I just find it interesting that none of them had a true Superstar WR -- top 2-3 at their position.

When I look back at the history books, I have to go back to 1999 to find one -- Torry Holt.

It may just be a big coincidence -- it probably is. But a notable one.

It is.

And Cruz was elite last year for the Giants. Maybe not top 2-3, but he played like a top 5 WR last year.

Having an elite WR definitely doesn't hurt your chances of winning a SB, that's absurd.

[Lazyking]

We have enough skill players to win but Dez is a matchup problem for every corner in the league. Without him, it would be tougher to score. Romo would have to go through all his reads every play to find someone open.

[TwoDeep3]

I thought it was without Tony Romo Dallas wouldn't have a chance.

[CaptainMorgan]

Originally Posted by TwoDeep3

I thought it was without Tony Romo Dallas wouldn't have a chance.

no doubt about it

[Gameover]

If the Cowboys didn't have Dez, then Romo would throw more TD passes to D.Harris.

[Ultimategamer5567]

Originally Posted by TwoDeep3

I thought it was without Tony Romo Dallas wouldn't have a chance.

Didn't you hear? Romo sucks. Some QB named Colin Klein is our only hope in the future.

[Frozen700]

Originally Posted by Clove

I get the feeling you really really like Dez Bryant. This is like your 4th thread on him this week. Great article.

Dez is the best Player outside of Romo on this team...hands down

[rocyaice]

Without Romo we wouldn't stand a chance. We went 8-8 with Laurent Robinson being our main option last season. Dez is BIG for our offense but let's don't kid ourselves. Without Romo this team would MAYBE have 4 wins.

[DC Cowboy]

Originally Posted by rocyaice

Without Romo we wouldn't stand a chance. We went 8-8 with Laurent Robinson being our main option last season. Dez is BIG for our offense but let's don't kid ourselves. Without Romo this team would MAYBE have 4 wins.

Is it possible to have a thread about Dez without bringing up Witten or Romo? All are important to this team but if we have a "Romo" thread do we need to bash Romo or say in the thread that he wouldn't be anything without Dez. How can we not see they all work together? Just saying. This started off about Dez, next thing I know we are talking about Murray, Witten, Romo ...