Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-07-2013   #31
Mansta54
Senior Member
 
Mansta54's Avatar
 
Joined:
Sep 2005
Location:
Germantown, Mary
Posts:
9,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clove View Post
So where was that offensive line when BOTH QBs were under heavy pressure last night?

I guess you have to learn to play under pressure sometimes, what a concept.
Sometimes, yes, but not all the time like Romo does. He's constantly escaping and making trick moves to get the pass off. Yea I know, I'm sure you don't see that cause you don't want to see it. Smh!!
Mansta54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #32
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh_Canada View Post
Unreal...good olines my backside.

There is nothing great about either offensive line,

they've had the good fortune of both being pretty healthy all year as well.
So a 6th rounder sets a franchise rushing record but the OL isnt that good?

Lynch had the year he had behind a bad OL?

Dont both teams have Pro Bowlers on their OL's?

Whats unreal is to create a fantasy in your mind that the OL's for these teams arent very good. They certainly were very effective.

I might as well be having a "discussion" with my wife about the OL's.
WPBCowboysFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #33
Trajan
Senior Member
 
Trajan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Oct 2010
Location:
Where Uncle Sam
Posts:
588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansta54 View Post
Sometimes, yes, but not all the time like Romo does. He's constantly escaping and making trick moves to get the pass off. Yea I know, I'm sure you don't see that cause you don't want to see it. Smh!!
Exactly, there is a difference between some pressure and getting killed as often as Romo. Give the guy some O-line help.

Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We are what we repeatedly do. - Aristotle
Trajan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #34
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WPBCowboysFan View Post
So a 6th rounder sets a franchise rushing record but the OL isnt that good?

Lynch had the year he had behind a bad OL?

Dont both teams have Pro Bowlers on their OL's?

Whats unreal is to create a fantasy in your mind that the OL's for these teams arent very good. They certainly were very effective.

I might as well be having a "discussion" with my wife about the OL's.
You're a funny guy.

Well guess what-know the ONE game the Skins played without RGIII, the great Alfred Morris ran for 3.2 yds per carry.

They stink. Lucky they have such a dynamic QB or Morris would be nothing more than a bigger Phillip Tanner.

Seahawks again are fortunate that they also have the benefit of an exciting QB, but more importantly a great defense. They stay in a lot of games and Lynch wears teams down.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #35
WPBCowboysFan
Senior Member
 
WPBCowboysFan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2012
Location:
WPB, FL
Posts:
2,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh_Canada View Post
You're a funny guy.

Well guess what-know the ONE game the Skins played without RGIII, the great Alfred Morris ran for 3.2 yds per carry.

They stink. Lucky they have such a dynamic QB or Morris would be nothing more than a bigger Phillip Tanner.

Seahawks again are fortunate that they also have the benefit of an exciting QB, but more importantly a great defense. They stay in a lot of games and Lynch wears teams down.

You're basing the "Skins played without RGIII" argument on a 1 game sample size?

Didnt the other rookie QB win that game "without RGIII" showing that they did just fine w/o RGIII?

Why dont you want to admit that the OL for the Foreskins is the major reason that the Skins had success? They made it easy for RG3. And for Morris. WHy is accepting reality so hard?
WPBCowboysFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #36
burmafrd
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
May 2005
Location:
WHITE SANDS NM
Posts:
38,190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WPBCowboysFan View Post
You're basing the "Skins played without RGIII" argument on a 1 game sample size?

Didnt the other rookie QB win that game "without RGIII" showing that they did just fine w/o RGIII?

Why dont you want to admit that the OL for the Foreskins is the major reason that the Skins had success? They made it easy for RG3. And for Morris. WHy is accepting reality so hard?
because he is one who has from day one refused to believe we need to put more resources into the O line. So its a self fulfilling prophecy he is trying to lay out
Las Cruces NM
White Sands NM

Where men are men and the sheep are scared!
burmafrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #37
Coy
Senior Member
 
Coy's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2004
Posts:
1,366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansta54 View Post
Sometimes, yes, but not all the time like Romo does. He's constantly escaping and making trick moves to get the pass off. Yea I know, I'm sure you don't see that cause you don't want to see it. Smh!!
Romo is a good QB, IMO he needs better coaching and a better team around him, Look at this stats I came across:

Good stat from Babe Laufenberg. Romo with a 100-plus rating: 37-11. Cutler 25-1, Ryan 32-1, Brady 79-5.

Although I do realize he has to play much better in big games.
Coy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #38
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WPBCowboysFan View Post
You're basing the "Skins played without RGIII" argument on a 1 game sample size?

Didnt the other rookie QB win that game "without RGIII" showing that they did just fine w/o RGIII?

Why dont you want to admit that the OL for the Foreskins is the major reason that the Skins had success? They made it easy for RG3. And for Morris. WHy is accepting reality so hard?
Well....how good were they last year without RG3? I didn't see any, "what a great OL can do for a QB" threads last year using the Skins as an example?

So how did Cousins do last night?? How did Alfred Morris do once Rg3 left the game?

I will happily admit when I see a good oline, but the Skins aren't one of them. They benefit from scheme and RG3. If he doesn't play, they are among the worst units in football, stop holding them up as some kind of gold standard.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #39
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burmafrd View Post
because he is one who has from day one refused to believe we need to put more resources into the O line. So its a self fulfilling prophecy he is trying to lay out
Yeah ok--guess you're ok with FA's and castoffs on the oline than, because that's exactly what you have with the Deadskins oline.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #40
IrishAnto
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh_Canada View Post

There is nothing great about either offensive line, and if you're going to hold them up as gold standards as to how to build an oline you should look at the way they are composed. Plenty of FA's, late picks and waiver claims on both units, they've had the good fortune of both being pretty healthy all year as well.
Let’s take a look at this statement in a little more detail shall we?
Starting line up for both teams last night

Seattle Seahawks

Russell Okung 1sr round SS 6th overall pick
Max Ungar 2nd round pick
Paul McQuistan 3rd round pick
Jr Sweezy 7th round pick
Breno Giacomini 5th round pick

Washington Redskins

Trent Williams 1st round 4th overall pick
Kory Lichtensteiger 4th round pick
Will Montgomery 7th round pick
Chris Chester 2nd round pick
Tyler Ploumbus undrafted

So less late picks and free agents and more draft picks 50% of the ten players taken in the first three rounds.
IrishAnto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #41
IrishAnto
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh_Canada View Post
Yeah ok--guess you're ok with FA's and castoffs on the oline than, because that's exactly what you have with the Deadskins oline.
See my post above.
IrishAnto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #42
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishAnto View Post
Let’s take a look at this statement in a little more detail shall we?
Starting line up for both teams last night

Seattle Seahawks

Russell Okung 1sr round SS 6th overall pick
Max Ungar 2nd round pick
Paul McQuistan 3rd round pick
Jr Sweezy 7th round pick
Breno Giacomini 5th round pick

Washington Redskins

Trent Williams 1st round 4th overall pick
Kory Lichtensteiger 4th round pick
Will Montgomery 7th round pick
Chris Chester 2nd round pick
Tyler Ploumbus undrafted

So less late picks and free agents and more draft picks 50% of the ten players taken in the first three rounds.
McQuistan was a waiver pickup-nice try. Fifth team in five years.
Will Mongotmery-waivers...fourth team in four years. Nice try.

How is this group any different than the Cowboys talent wise??? It's not-the biggest difference is the schemes, OC, and most importantly QB.

Glad you come around again only when defending other teams olines.

I can use Aaron Rodgers and the Packers again as an example of what a REAL OC and QB can do for an oline, but I won't.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #43
IrishAnto
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh_Canada View Post
McQuistan was a waiver pickup-nice try. Fifth team in five years.
Will Mongotmery-waivers...fourth team in four years. Nice try.

How is this group any different than the Cowboys talent wise??? It's not-the biggest difference is the schemes, OC, and most importantly QB.
He was still a 3rd round pick.

And what about the other 1st and 2nd rounders. They don't count?

Nice try!
IrishAnto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #44
Oh_Canada
Senior Member
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Nov 2004
Posts:
4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishAnto View Post
He was still a 3rd round pick.

And what about the other 1st and 2nd rounders. They don't count?

Nice try!
Ok than.

Cook-2nd rd pick
Nate Livings-FA
Bernardeau-7th
Smith-1st rd
Free-3rd rd.

How many second/third round lineman have the Cowboys picked? Thought you said those shouldn't be considered high picks? Could have sworn you said other teams castaways aren't a way to solve the oline?? Or does it only apply to other teams?

I just find it funny that a team whose oline blew last year and gained Trent Williams but lost Jamaal Brown is suddenly an oline the Cowboys should emulate.
Oh_Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013   #45
perrykemp
Senior Member
 
perrykemp's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2008
Posts:
3,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh_Canada View Post
I can use Aaron Rodgers and the Packers again as an example of what a REAL OC and QB can do for an oline, but I won't.
I hear you, however, I think the Aaron Rodgers example isn't a great one and I tell you why:

Some day NFL stats geeks will pour of Aaron Rodgers stats with sheer amazement and wonder how the heck the QB with the highest QB rating in the history of the NFL was also the most sacked QB in the league at the same.

Logic would tell you the most sacked QB in the league would have an absolutely terrible QB rating and the teams he was playing on would have sucked.

In otherwords, I'm not sure we've ever seen a QB in the history of the league who has ever done what Rodgers is doing. Lots of the credit goes to McCarthy.

Having said that, to say "well, the Packers offense still performs despite a shoddy OL and no running game so ours should to" is akin in my mind to pointing to a 1 in 1000 statically anomaly and saying "well, look, it IS possible".
perrykemp is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com