Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2013   #1
Verdict
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,714
Default Don't Bite The Shiny Lure.

The hiring of Kiffin has a many 'Zoners clammoring for the drafting of new players to fix the defense due to the change in our defensive scheme. That sounds great, in theory, but shouldn't our first priority be to fix that porous offensive line?

Drafting the next Warren Sapp might be a great deal for the defense, but realistically are we going to go with a patchwork offensive line again next year? Unless the next Warren Sapp can also be a dominant OT, or G/C (that is sarcasm for you who ride the short bus) it is really going to be disappointing if we go a defense heavy draft this year at the expense of the OL, yet again.
Verdict is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-12-2013   #2
blindzebra
Senior Member
 
blindzebra's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
8,598
Default

The pieces for the 4-3 are there. We have questions about RDE, SOLB and FS but plenty of time for Kiffin to evaluate Crawford, Albright and Johnson.

We should be able to go OL early and often.
blindzebra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #3
dadymat
I'm kind of a Big Deal
 
dadymat's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2007
Location:
Under The Bus
Posts:
6,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
The hiring of Kiffin has a many 'Zoners clammoring for the drafting of new players to fix the defense due to the change in our defensive scheme. That sounds great, in theory, but shouldn't our first priority be to fix that porous offensive line?

Drafting the next Warren Sapp might be a great deal for the defense, but realistically are we going to go with a patchwork offensive line again next year? Unless the next Warren Sapp can also be a dominant OT, or G/C (that is sarcasm for you who ride the short bus) it is really going to be disappointing if we go a defense heavy draft this year at the expense of the OL, yet again.
I believe we would be targeting Oline, D line and S in the draft either way 3-4 / 4-3 we needed same replacements.....this just changes the type of those positions we will be looking for.
If you really think about it this is a good year for us to switch back to the 4-3, this draft is strong on d line, O line and there are some good safeties too... and i believe Jerry goes hard after a FA interior linemen.
I really dont think the O line will get ignored....
dadymat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #4
UncFelix28
Senior Member
 
UncFelix28's Avatar
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Posts:
2,011
Default

Put a best player available list together with these positions combined.. OG/DE/S/DT.... We'll see what happens in free agency first, but whoever is #1 on your list by the time you draft at those 4 positions, you have to select that player.
UncFelix28 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #5
Woods
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004, 2009, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
London, England
Posts:
12,309
Default

I would not be surprised if we picked up 1 OL in FA and 1 DL in FA as well.

I think guys like Coleman, Free, Connor and possibly Spears will be gone (along with F Jones, Jenkins).
Woods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #6
SWG9
Senior Member
 
SWG9's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2011
Posts:
727
Default

This team is riddled with holes and dangerously thin in several key areas. Dallas can't afford to get cute and force picks, they just have to draft the BPA at every turn.
SWG9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #7
PJTHEDOORS
Senior Member
 
PJTHEDOORS's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Posts:
772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
The hiring of Kiffin has a many 'Zoners clammoring for the drafting of new players to fix the defense due to the change in our defensive scheme. That sounds great, in theory, but shouldn't our first priority be to fix that porous offensive line?

Drafting the next Warren Sapp might be a great deal for the defense, but realistically are we going to go with a patchwork offensive line again next year? Unless the next Warren Sapp can also be a dominant OT, or G/C (that is sarcasm for you who ride the short bus) it is really going to be disappointing if we go a defense heavy draft this year at the expense of the OL, yet again.
No Ratliff, no Josh Brent, leaves us with no DT's. Hatcher and Crawford are DE's. Lissemore is a DT/DE. And he's not exactly a run stopper for a DT. So talk about patchwork.
I like ideas about the breaking away or overthrowing of established order. I am interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos -- especially activity that seems to have no meaning. It seems to me to be the road toward freedom -- external revolt is a way to bring about internal freedom. Rather than starting inside, I start outside -- reach the mental through the physical. - Jim Morrison
PJTHEDOORS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #8
noshame
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005, 2010
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,223
Default

The current players we have are better suited for the 43 now. It won't take much tweaking. We will pick this defense up much faster and the players will fly to the ball instead of worring about responsibilities.

All i'm worried about is the old man adjusting on the fly.
By the end of 2014 Romo will not be starting for the cowboys and the most popular phrase on the board will be..."see I knew we shouldn't have signed him to that big contract".
noshame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #9
PJTHEDOORS
Senior Member
 
PJTHEDOORS's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Posts:
772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWG9 View Post
This team is riddled with holes and dangerously thin in several key areas. Dallas can't afford to get cute and force picks, they just have to draft the BPA at every turn.
Exactly. DL or OL, maybe even S.
I like ideas about the breaking away or overthrowing of established order. I am interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos -- especially activity that seems to have no meaning. It seems to me to be the road toward freedom -- external revolt is a way to bring about internal freedom. Rather than starting inside, I start outside -- reach the mental through the physical. - Jim Morrison
PJTHEDOORS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #10
Shinywalrus
Senior Member
 
Shinywalrus's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2012
 
Joined:
Oct 2008
Location:
Austin, TX
Posts:
1,737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdict View Post
The hiring of Kiffin has a many 'Zoners clammoring for the drafting of new players to fix the defense due to the change in our defensive scheme. That sounds great, in theory, but shouldn't our first priority be to fix that porous offensive line?

Drafting the next Warren Sapp might be a great deal for the defense, but realistically are we going to go with a patchwork offensive line again next year? Unless the next Warren Sapp can also be a dominant OT, or G/C (that is sarcasm for you who ride the short bus) it is really going to be disappointing if we go a defense heavy draft this year at the expense of the OL, yet again.
I think you'll find that Jerry and Jason have concluded that our offensive production was generally good and that by the end of the season our offensive line began playing reasonably well together.

This latter point, I think, will cause them to spend less resources on offensive linemen than I think a lot of fans would like or expect. Maintaining continuity will be a priority.
Shinywalrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #11
Sarge
94
 
Sarge's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Utica, N.Y.
Posts:
18,660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SWG9 View Post
This team is riddled with holes and dangerously thin in several key areas. Dallas can't afford to get cute and force picks, they just have to draft the BPA at every turn.

There is no formula for success except an unconditional acceptance of life and what it brings.
Sarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #12
Eddie
Senior Member
 
Eddie's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007
 
Joined:
Jun 2004
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
7,974
Default

Is Arkin ready to play? If so, that can solve a lot of our issues.
Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #13
HoustonFrog
Senior Member
 
HoustonFrog's Avatar
Years Donated
2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2009
Location:
Chicago
Posts:
1,310
Default

I like guards from Alabama and North Carolina respectively....Warmack and Cooper. Both should be in the 15-25 range and I really think protecting Romo us key.
HoustonFrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #14
SWG9
Senior Member
 
SWG9's Avatar
 
Joined:
May 2011
Posts:
727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie View Post
Is Arkin ready to play? If so, that can solve a lot of our issues.
Just give him another two years in an NFL strength and conditioning program and we might be able to activate him on gamedays.
SWG9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013   #15
TheCount
Pixel Pusher
 
TheCount's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2007
Location:
New York, NY
Posts:
19,590
Default

It happens EVERY year.

When the season ends, it's clear the offensive line was a major factor... But the closer we get to FA and the draft, the more you'll hear about all these totter positions that need to be addressed.

By daft time, a lot of people (and the cowboys staff) will be convinced safety is a bigger need than OL or CB, etc.

It has happened at least 5 years straight and its always fascinating to watch. It's no wonder the team need list has been virtually unchanged for so long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddie View Post
Is Arkin ready to play? If so, that can solve a lot of our issues.
Hahhaha. Arkin? Be careful what you wish for. What about Leary? Yeah, we got some real talent here just waiting for their chance.
We need wins, and that's all we need. I don't give a damn about anyone on this roster over wins. I'd trade Ware, Lee and Dez if it meant more wins.
TheCount is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com