Speculation: Garrett quietly resisting offensive coordinator hire

[Hostile]

Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt

He was Beaker?

Bottled water...everywhere...

[rickjameschinaclub]

Originally Posted by Hostile

I think Ryan is a good coach, but I think his mouth got him in trouble. I haven't seen a player say Jason Garrett is a bad coach, so could you please point me towards that?

Well, TO did and so did Crayton... those guys that did, aren't here. And it's been confirmed on the field by how inept the offense looks with Garrett in charge, despite these 'cancers' being removed.

Irrespective of what you think about them, that qualifies as testimony and evidence.

What excuse does Garrett have now...

[cannonball44]

Originally Posted by Risen Star

Your idea of objective isn't mine and probably isn't the head coach's. When I look at it objectively I see absolutely no issue with scheme or play calling. I see a fan crutch. A cop out. I see a lack of talent up front to the tune of the worst OL in the league.

The absolute worst thing we can do is retain a head coach who wants to run his offense and then force him into bringing someone else on the staff to run it for him. It's ridiculous micromanaging nonsense that this team has seen too many times over the last 17 years. It destroys the credibility and authority of the head coach. Setting him up for nothing but failure.

You either roll with Garrett in charge or you fire him. It's should be as simple as that.

I see a major problem with first half droughts, and most of our points coming from a Romo-led hurry up offense when we're down by 14+ entering the 4th quarter.

worst Oline in the league? nothing but hyperbole. we wouldnt have gone 8-8 with the WORST Oline in the league. believe that.

But I do believe that this is General Garrett Bonaparte's last stand, and if he wants to make it as the OC/HC then I can definitely respect that.

[dadymat]

Originally Posted by rickjameschinaclub

Yeah, we've been sucked as is evidenced by the fact that John Garrett, Garrett's brother, was just looking for a HC job at Delaware for the sake of it..

Oh wait, it turns out nobody in the organization could stand him and he was applying for job's elsewhere, because of this...

well, that has nothing to do with this for one......for two, Just because John is looking for another job and people disliked him doesnt mean that Jerry was forcing him out , and it certainly doessnt mean Jerry was doing it trying to get Garrett to quit

[Hostile]

Originally Posted by rickjameschinaclub

Well, TO did and so did Crayton... those guys that did, aren't here. And it's been confirmed on the field by how inept the offense looks with Garrett in charge, despite these 'cancers' being removed.

Irrespective of what you think about them, that qualifies as testimony and evidence.

What excuse does Garrett have now...

Witten, Romo, Ware, Lee, Carter, et al.

TO and Crayton who never played under him as HC.

Hmmmmmmmm.

I think you're going to strain a muscle reaching there.

[Eric_Boyer]

Originally Posted by rickjameschinaclub

Well, TO did and so did Crayton... those guys that did, aren't here. And it's been confirmed on the field by how inept the offense looks with Garrett in charge, despite these 'cancers' being removed.

Irrespective of what you think about them, that qualifies as testimony and evidence.

What excuse does Garrett have now...

your definition of inept sucks.

Has the results been mediocre? yes. inept? not even close.

[Hostile]

Originally Posted by dadymat

well, that has nothing to do with this for one......for two, Just because John is looking for another job and people disliked him doesnt mean that Jerry was forcing him out , and it certainly doessnt mean Jerry was doing it trying to get Garrett to quit

Jason Witten likes John Garrett a lot. So does James Hanna.

Just saying.

[cannonball44]

Originally Posted by Hostile

Witten, Romo, Ware, Lee, Carter, et al.

TO and Crayton who never played under him as HC.

Hmmmmmmmm.

I think you're going to strain a muscle reaching there.

To be fair this thread isnt about Garrett the HC. Its about Garrett the OC.

Not trying start an argument, just bein fair.

[rickjameschinaclub]

Originally Posted by Hostile

Witten, Romo, Ware, Lee, Carter, et al.

TO and Crayton who never played under him as HC.

Hmmmmmmmm.

I think you're going to strain a muscle reaching there.

Me starining a muscle reaching.. that's quite laughable for multiple reasons, among them:

1. TO and Crayton did play for him and you didn't say HC. You said coach and JG was coaching with them and they said he pretty much sucked.

2. So Sean lee tells us Rob Ryan is a great DC, you tell us it was his mouth that got him canned.

So you get to pick and choose what constitutes testimony and evidence?
So yeah, spin it anyway you want... but it is what it is.. testimony and evidence...

[Dhragon]

Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt

He was Beaker?

Then I guess Jerry and Lacewell are the two old guys in the balcony.

[Hostile]

Originally Posted by cannonball44

To be fair this thread isnt about Garrett the HC. Its about Garrett the OC.

Not trying start an argument, just bein fair.

Yeah, but he's not the OC, that is Bill Callahan. Just telling the truth.

[rickjameschinaclub]

Originally Posted by Eric_Boyer

your definition of inept sucks.

Has the results been mediocre? yes. inept? not even close.

My bad, Garrett's crap doesn't stink as bad as somebody else's, if that's comforting for ya...

[BoysFan4ever]

Originally Posted by Chocolate Lab

I wouldn't stand for this, Jason. I think you should resign immediately.

Yes please do Jason.

[jjktkk]

Originally Posted by Hostile

Actually, there is testimony of that, from coaches and players alike.

As well as testimoney on the field, as in the players play hard for him.

[Eric_Boyer]

Originally Posted by rickjameschinaclub

Jason Garrett a leader of men, but really insecure...



See how the Garrett homer's spin this latest news... He's a genius at drawing up plays. Well, he can't handle play-calling duties and just focus on doing what he does best. He should strictly be the HC, because he's a leader of men. Well, he shouldn't be the HC, because he's really insecure. How about Jason as GM?

let me give you some advice. If you are ever in this position of power, don't allow other people to undermine your power. Once that happens, it is no longer possible to lead.

If this report is true, it merely confirms to me that Garrett understands the organizational infrastructure required to win, and Jones does not.