Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2013   #1
jday
Senior Member
 
jday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,601
Default What about the 52 against the read option?

Imagine: DL: Ware Lissemore Ratliff Hatcher Spencer
LB: Carter Lee
Secondary: Carr Sensabaugh Church Claiborne

I'm not an expert, but I would think this alignment would be far more effective against the read option than the Tampa 43. Thoughts?
jday is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-18-2013   #2
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jday View Post
Imagine: DL: Ware Lissemore Ratliff Hatcher Spencer
LB: Carter Lee
Secondary: Carr Sensabaugh Church Claiborne

I'm not an expert, but I would think this alignment would be far more effective against the read option than the Tampa 43. Thoughts?
You'll play hell against a WC offense thou.
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #3
Illini88228
Senior Member
 
Illini88228's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2010
Posts:
1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jday View Post
Imagine: DL: Ware Lissemore Ratliff Hatcher Spencer
LB: Carter Lee
Secondary: Carr Sensabaugh Church Claiborne

I'm not an expert, but I would think this alignment would be far more effective against the read option than the Tampa 43. Thoughts?
In practice that's going to be almost indistinguishable from the 3-4.
Illini88228 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #4
jday
Senior Member
 
jday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQCOWBOY View Post
You'll play hell against a WC offense thou.
I'm not saying make it our base alignment...I'm just saying it could probably be useful against the team that employ the read option on a regular basis, like the Redskins.
jday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #5
jday
Senior Member
 
jday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2008
Posts:
1,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Illini88228 View Post
In practice that's going to be almost indistinguishable from the 3-4.
Granted, it will look alot like it, but the responsibilities of the players will be different.
jday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #6
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jday View Post
Granted, it will look alot like it, but the responsibilities of the players will be different.
Against a read option, I wouldn't really think so. The OLB/DE will still need to set the edge and ILBs will have to come over the top to make plays.
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #7
ABQCOWBOY
Moderator
 
ABQCOWBOY's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
29,548
Default

Honestly, I think if you just play your keys and maintain gap integrity, you can stop that offense. JMO
ABQCOWBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #8
Tobal
Senior Member
Years Donated
2004
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Amarillo
Posts:
1,761
Default

I think the 4-3 puts a little less stress on your DE than it does if he's lined up as an OLB in the 3-4. I think he can be more aggressive knowing that although he still sets the edge there is a LB there to cleanup what he is hopefully disrupting.

Penetration is going to be the key to stopping the read option I think...
Tobal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #9
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobal View Post
I think the 4-3 puts a little less stress on your DE than it does if he's lined up as an OLB in the 3-4. I think he can be more aggressive knowing that although he still sets the edge there is a LB there to cleanup what he is hopefully disrupting.

Penetration is going to be the key to stopping the read option I think...
Having a healthy Sean Lee and Bruce Carter darn sure would help.
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #10
silver
Senior Member
 
silver's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,770
Default

Looks like the 3-4
"I could've done a $2 billion takeover (in another industry) with the capital I put in the Dallas Cowboys," he says. "I really could see (myself as) the idiot who had something real good, who blew it all to coach the Cowboys. I just knew that was going to be my legacy." Jerry Jones 9/14/2012

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/c...ore/57780004/1
silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2013   #11
Reality
Administrator
 
Reality's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
10,498
Default

My philosophy would be simple .. if the quarterback intimates a run, hit the quarterback hard every single time. Yes, you might get burned a time or two, but you run that risk guessing wrong anyway. Just keep hitting the quarterback enough and I have a feeling the other team will start getting worried about their franchise guy.

Before anyone talks about "protected quarterbacks", this came up early last year with Vick complaining. The NFL basically said if he acts like a runner, he's a runner whether he runs or not. That's how teams started attacking Vick. They just went after him as if he was going to run the ball every time he made a break for the line.

/reality
Reality is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com