
|
01-25-2013
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Oct 2004 |
Location: | San Diego, Ca |
Posts: | 233 |
|
Tired of hearing Garrett losing power / Gruden on the Way
I am so damn tired of hearing this. Jason is STILL the HEAD COACH! Now he can focus on beng the HEAD COACH! Now he will have more influence on the WHOLE team because he can be a HEAD COACH! Every SB wining Cowboys coach DID NOT call plays. Please shut up about Garrett losing power, he is actually gaining it. Ask Jimmy Johnson what he thinks - this is the best move for Jason and the COWBOYS! Jerrah got it right but people read to Yahoo news to believe what they know is true, this is a goos move for Cowboys!
BTW- Jason will be the coach of the Cowboys for the next 10 years, not because of Jerry but because of Stephen Jones. Gruden doesnt fit with Cowboys and would will be a terrible hire.
"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much for so long with so little, that we are now qualified to do anything with nothing."
Anonymous, but classic....
Cowboys fan since 1972....
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,689 |
|
The Gruden rumor might be the dumbest of all the Jerry related stories over the years.
It is amazing that people believe that an owner would plan out the coaching staff a year in advance of hiring the head coach. That would indicate that Jerry is planning on 2013 being a losing season.
Love him or hate him, people just have not been paying attention if they think Jerry plans on losing. He just does not think in those terms.
The 2nd thing is that Jerry wouldn't put that type of effort into getting a Head Coach. He does not place that high of a value on them. IMO, he believes that the assistants and coordinators do all of the work.
The 3rd reason is that Jerry would not want a media-popular HC. It's like Parcells not a wanting a Celebrity QB.
You don’t know what you don’t know.
Half of the population has below average intelligence.
Last edited by xwalker : 01-25-2013 at 08:07 PM.
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2009 |
Location: | Queens, NY |
Posts: | 1,263 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
I am so damn tired of hearing this. Jason is STILL the HEAD COACH! Now he can focus on beng the HEAD COACH! Now he will have more influence on the WHOLE team because he can be a HEAD COACH! Every SB wining Cowboys coach DID NOT call plays. Please shut up about Garrett losing power, he is actually gaining it. Ask Jimmy Johnson what he thinks - this is the best move for Jason and the COWBOYS! Jerrah got it right but people read to Yahoo news to believe what they know is true, this is a goos move for Cowboys!
BTW- Jason will be the coach of the Cowboys for the next 10 years, not because of Jerry but because of Stephen Jones. Gruden doesnt fit with Cowboys and would will be a terrible hire.
|
Garrett wont last past next season IMO fwiw
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 3,240 |
|
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#5
|
|
The Actualist
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 6,003 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
I am so damn tired of hearing this. Jason is STILL the HEAD COACH! Now he can focus on beng the HEAD COACH! Now he will have more influence on the WHOLE team because he can be a HEAD COACH! Every SB wining Cowboys coach DID NOT call plays. Please shut up about Garrett losing power, he is actually gaining it. Ask Jimmy Johnson what he thinks - this is the best move for Jason and the COWBOYS! Jerrah got it right but people read to Yahoo news to believe what they know is true, this is a goos move for Cowboys!
BTW- Jason will be the coach of the Cowboys for the next 10 years, not because of Jerry but because of Stephen Jones. Gruden doesnt fit with Cowboys and would will be a terrible hire.
|
................ !!
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2009 |
Location: | Queens, NY |
Posts: | 1,263 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker
The Gruden rumor might be the dumbest of all the Jerry related statements over the years.
|
Agreed
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,783 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason54858
Garrett wont last past next season IMO fwiw
|
I agree....might as well fire him now, Jerry pretty much neutered him in the eyes of the players by the moves thus far...
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2009 |
Location: | 30 yardline |
Posts: | 2,761 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
BTW- Jason will be the coach of the Cowboys for the next 10 years
|

|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2008 |
Posts: | 432 |
|
Gruden might not be coming but there's no doubt that Garretts lost what little power he had with the team. This coming season is a make or break season for him. I always wanted him to be just a head coach but it had to be his choice.
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Sep 2004 |
Location: | Orlando, FL |
Posts: | 10,651 |
|
I never understood the theory that if Garrett isn't calling plays, then he shouldn't be the head coach. Most head coaches in the league don't call plays. The JOB for Garrett is to win games and win a Super Bowl. I wouldn't care who is calling plays if that happened.
Then you have people here who have called for Garrett to give up his playcalling and once that happens...they say that Garrett lost all of his power.
YR
The integrity of the Dallas Sports Media can be summed up in this quote 'I've gotta be the bad guy on CBS11 and my radio job on ESPN. I don't have to be the bad guy here.' - Steve Dennis
Legend of Kirby Dar Dar Blog
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#11
|
|
I've got moxie
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 9,114 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakuza Rich
I never understood the theory that if Garrett isn't calling plays, then he shouldn't be the head coach. Most head coaches in the league don't call plays. The JOB for Garrett is to win games and win a Super Bowl. I wouldn't care who is calling plays if that happened.
Then you have people here who have called for Garrett to give up his playcalling and once that happens...they say that Garrett lost all of his power.
YR
|
It is the right move, but.....it is odd. I think I posted something along those lines prior to all the coaching changes. I just wish they had brought in someone from the outside and turned over more of the offensive staff.
I don't think the Gruden thing is a possibility, but I am curious why they decided the Tampa 2 was the way they wanted to go. I'm sure the Chicago game might have had some influence, but it seems like an odd transition.
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2009 |
Location: | Queens, NY |
Posts: | 1,263 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakuza Rich
I never understood the theory that if Garrett isn't calling plays, then he shouldn't be the head coach. Most head coaches in the league don't call plays. The JOB for Garrett is to win games and win a Super Bowl. I wouldn't care who is calling plays if that happened.
Then you have people here who have called for Garrett to give up his playcalling and once that happens...they say that Garrett lost all of his power.
YR
|
I think people understand there are many HCs who don't call plays. Garrett not calling the plays is not the issue. The issue is it appears Jerry made the call to strip the play calling duties from Garrett. If this is indeed what happened then it compromises Garrett's authority.
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#13
|
|
The Actualist
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 6,003 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason54858
I think people understand there are many HCs who don't call plays. Garrett not calling the plays is not the issue. The issue is it appears Jerry made the call to strip the play calling duties from Garrett. If this is indeed what happened then it compromises Garrett's authority.
|
Most everything that comes out of his mouth compromises any authority other than his own.
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#14
|
|
Run-loving Dino
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | 1-star thread |
Posts: | 32,047 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason54858
I think people understand there are many HCs who don't call plays. Garrett not calling the plays is not the issue. The issue is it appears Jerry made the call to strip the play calling duties from Garrett. If this is indeed what happened then it compromises Garrett's authority.
|
Yep, should be pretty obvious.
Did anyone hear Greg Ellis on the Fan about half an hour ago? They asked him about these very things. He said the players do pay attention to things like this (Jerry making coaching hires and stripping playcalling) and they do realize that Jerry is the one in charge. And he said that did affect the team at times, though he didn't give specifics.
But he said everyone just had to realize that was the way things were here and play anyway.
Ivy League
Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
|
|
|
01-25-2013
|
#15
|
|
The Instant Classic
Years Donated 2005, 2009, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Moar leadership! |
Posts: | 20,393 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverStarCowboy
Most everything that comes out of his mouth compromises any authority other than his own.
|
Yeah, JG really limits himself when he opens his mouth. Good point.
When asked whether Jason Garrett is the right head coach for this team: "I don't think there is anyone else that could. I think he is an unbelievable coach. We've responded to him and he has made us better football players, better people. If you watch us I think we play with a certain relentless spirit." --Sean Lee
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.
|