Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Fan Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2013   #1
Phoenix
Senior Member
 
Phoenix's Avatar
Years Donated
2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Aug 2008
Location:
Arlington, VA
Posts:
3,759
Default PFF ranks Cowboys OL #22

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...fensive-lines/


Ranking the 2012 Offensive Lines

Khaled Elsayed | 2013/01/28


22. Dallas Cowboys (15)

PB – 26th, RB – 8th, PEN – 32nd
Stud: Never let us say we can’t be wrong. Nate Livings (+11.3) had his most consistent year as a pro in Dallas, making a mark with his run blocking.


Dud: It may be time to admit that signing Doug Free (-10.1) long-term just hasn’t worked out. There were too many games where he was taken to the woodshed by explosive defensive ends.


Summary: The Cowboys have put some money into their line recently, but the return just wasn’t there in 2012. Tyron Smith had an at times awkward first year at left tackle, while Mackenzy Bernadeau gave up too much pressure for an interior linemen. There is talent here, but like a lot of spots in Dallas you don’t always see it.








...posting this just because I want to cause brain hemorrhaging with the PFF haters bwaaa ha ha



(pass block - 26, run block - 8, penalties - dead last, 15th ranked last year)
The liver is EVIL! It must be PUNISHED!
Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 01-28-2013   #2
CyberB0b
Senior Member
 
CyberB0b's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2012
Posts:
1,240
Default

I don't see how you can determine the Cowboys were #8 in run blocking, using any type of metric.
CyberB0b is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #3
unionjack8
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2007
Location:
Toronto
Posts:
1,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberB0b View Post
I don't see how you can determine the Cowboys were #8 in run blocking, using any type of metric.
agreed, a 3.6 avg and 8 tds says that PFF are useless.
unionjack8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #4
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberB0b View Post
I don't see how you can determine the Cowboys were #8 in run blocking, using any type of metric.
May have something to do with our low amount of runs.
CATCH17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #5
Titleist
Senior Member
 
Titleist's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2012
Location:
Philly
Posts:
237
Default

Quote:
PB – 26th, RB – 8th, PEN – 32nd
Stud: Never let us say we can’t be wrong. Nate Livings (+11.3) had his most consistent year as a pro in Dallas, making a mark with his run blocking.
Wow, Nate must have been god-awful in Cincinnati. No wonder they wanted him gone.
Titleist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #6
theebs
Believe!!!!
 
theebs's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2010
 
Joined:
Feb 2006
Location:
Cookies?
Posts:
20,488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberB0b View Post
I don't see how you can determine the Cowboys were #8 in run blocking, using any type of metric.
Yep.

The reason I think everyone should have been removed from there jobs including Jerry, Stephen and ciskowski is because of what they have done with the running game.

Its not up to nfl standards and the qb and skill positions are way too good to be this poor running the football.

Its completely unacceptable and just saying murray was hurt does not cut it for me.

They built it, they should pay the price for it.

"you may not be responsible but you will be held accountable" applies here in regards to the running game.

it should have been the catalyst to make real changes like other organizations do. Start at the top, rebuild the structure and let those people build a new program...

not here though.
theebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #7
Rack Bauer
Federal Agent
 
Rack Bauer's Avatar
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Fort Hood
Posts:
21,744
Default

PFF WAY overrated us on this one. They're being way too nice to us on this one.
Rack Bauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #8
DezBRomo9
Formerly joshjwc9
 
DezBRomo9's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Palm Harbor, FL
Posts:
1,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titleist
Quote:

PB – 26th, RB – 8th, PEN – 32nd
Stud: Never let us say we can’t be wrong. Nate Livings ( +11.3) had his most consistent year as a pro in Dallas, making a mark with his run blocking.

Wow, Nate must have been god-awful in Cincinnati. No wonder they wanted him gone.
Yeah, Cincinnati had a pretty good running game but its pass pro struggled at times. Honestly Cook, Costa, Smith and Livings were about what we should expect, but Free and Berny were God awful. Add killer and Parnell, plus a high pick at OG to replace Berny we should have an about average line to go into nex
t year. The only thing that will make us better is making teams actually bite our play action passes, then give Romo a chance with a 7 step drop. Remember having TO and Crayton catch those deep passes all day in '07? That is all we need...(and some more turnovers )


Posted from Cowboyszone.com App for Android
DezBRomo9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #9
coogrfan
Senior Member
 
coogrfan's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Houston, TX
Posts:
1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberB0b View Post
I don't see how you can determine the Cowboys were #8 in run blocking, using any type of metric.
Agreed. I have no idea how PFF comes up with it's rankings, but it's clear they need to tweek their methodology.

In 2012 the avg NFL team had 435.2 rushing atts for 1854.7 yds (4.3/att), 96.9 rushing 1st downs and 12.5 rushing tds. Our numbers: 355 atts, 1265 yds (3.6/att), 76 1st downs and 8 tds.
coogrfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #10
Future
Intramural Legend
 
Future's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Canandaigua, NY
Posts:
12,832
Default

I don't care what metrics they use. What idiot could possibly think that this OLine was top 10 in anything?
Future is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #11
percyhoward
Research Tool
 
percyhoward's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
under this tree
Posts:
6,429
Default

Remember, PFF put Bennett on their All-Pro team ahead of Witten.

Then came out later and said they'd made a mistake with their math.
percyhoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #12
robert70x7
Senior Member
 
robert70x7's Avatar
Years Donated
2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Jul 2011
Posts:
998
Default

I averaged out all of Football Outsider's O-Line Metrics, and here's what I came up with.
  1. Seattle
  2. Giants
  3. Patriots
  4. Saints
  5. 49ers
  6. Ravens
  7. Texans
  8. Bucs
  9. Bills
  10. 4skins
  11. Vikings
  12. Broncos
  13. Dolphins
  14. Lions
  15. Jets
  16. Bengals
  17. Rams
  18. Cowboys
  19. Chiefs
  20. Browns
  21. Steelers
  22. Jaguars
  23. Colts
  24. Eagles
  25. Bears
  26. Falcons
  27. Raiders
  28. Titans
  29. Panthers
  30. Chargers
  31. Packers
  32. Cardinals
Power Rank - 15th
Stuffed Rank - 12th
2nd Level Rank - 25th
Open Field Rank - 26th


Pass Blocking - 11th


Left End - 6th
Left Tackle - 9th
Mid/Guard - 17th
Right Tackle - 32nd
Right End - 28th
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13 View Post
It wouldn't have to be a first-round pick, and we will have free-agent money.
robert70x7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #13
cowboysooner
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2010
Posts:
1,256
Default

My impression of PFF is that they generally overrate penalties and somewhat run blocking. They underrate pass blocking. They don't account much for scheme differences i.e. 3 step drop or 7 step drop. They don't adjust for how a defense changes with a mobile qb.

It is not an accident that #1 pass blocking offensive lines follow Peyton Manning around the league. It is no accident that Bruce Arrian's qb's make big plays but take alot of sacks and hits.
cowboysooner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #14
DFWJC
Senior Member
 
DFWJC's Avatar
Years Donated
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Feb 2008
Location:
Dallas
Posts:
16,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by percyhoward View Post
Remember, PFF put Bennett on their All-Pro team ahead of Witten.

Then came out later and said they'd made a mistake with their math.
DFWJC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013   #15
cowboysooner
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2010
Posts:
1,256
Default

I do think it is instructive that Free was a big problem and McKenzie was bad, especially early. Also Evan Mathis went from camp fodder guy to the highest rated guard in the league. He was a McKenzie B level signing for the Eagles. That is some strong performance enhancement on their part.
cowboysooner is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com