Worst movie you ever saw?

[Doomsday101]

Originally Posted by CanadianCowboysFan

Surprised no one has mentioned "all movies starring John Wayne" Damn what an overrated piece of crap actor.

Well pilgram you talk awful big there. I'm not going to hit you... like hell I'm not.

[DFWJC]

Originally Posted by Diogenes

Pulp Fiction would have been my pick that year. Don't get me wrong, Shawshank and Forrest Gump were both great but IMO Pulp Fiction took film making to another level. A pretty good year for movies, that's for sure.

Also, as much as I like Shawshank, it wouldn't be in my top 10 all time, much less number 1.

Terriffic movie year.

I'd take Shawshank over Pulp Fiction and Gump, but I could see why someone could choose any of the three.

I watched each of them several times.

I didn't realize that 4 Weddings was that year too.
I liked that movie too. It was funny (fairly clever), moving (the funeral speech) and very corny all rolled in one.
It's 4th out of those four movies though, imo.

I guess we're off-track here seeing that this is a worst movie thread.

[Stryker44]

Babylon AD.

Where has Vin Diesel gone?

[MonsterD]

Not reading the whole thread, except the complete stupidity about how being anti- English Patient makes some in here feel manly or whatever.

Has anyone said Battlefield Earth? The Room is simply the worst but as far as big production goes...

[Jammer]

Originally Posted by MonsterD

Not reading the whole thread, except the complete stupidity about how being anti- English Patient makes some in here feel manly or whatever.

Has anyone said Battlefield Earth? The Room is simply the worst but as far as big production goes...

I would think no one has mentioned Battlefield Earth because no one here has seen it, so it wouldn't be mentioned in worst movies you ever *saw*.

[burmafrd]

Originally Posted by Doomsday101

Well pilgram you talk awful big there. I'm not going to hit you... like hell I'm not.

what do you expect from him? He cannot help doing his shtick.

[jterrell]

i have seen lots of terrible movies.
many were entertaining for being so bad.
i can laugh at bad.
battlefield earth? i can hilariously enjoy that waste of money while marveling over wack jobs who believe in that stuff. --any reference to wack jobs and a travolta film are completely unintentional so just carry on.

two movies that drew rave reviews from many that i hated were the aforementioned english patient and ghost.

it wasn't just that they were sappy chick flicks.
it was that they were sappy, chick flicks on an estrogen drip with a large dose of downers mixed in.

i literally fell asleep on the english patient and spent ghost looking at my girlfriends face as she sat unaware in some sort of weird chick stupor. it was like she was in some alternate universe.

those two films were what i imagine hell to be. just watching that drivel on repeat.

[BringBackThatOleTimeBoys]

Originally Posted by Joe Rod

Wow, 100 Posts and no one has mentioned Battlefield Earth? That movie was historically bad.

Maybe because nobody bothered to see it.

But it should have been mentioned sooner!

[rickjameschinaclub]

All I know is if Shawshank Redemption isn't included within your top 3 movies of all time, I'd like to be puffing what your puffing... It's so bad a$$, I sometimes think I'd put it ahead of Braveheart at number 1. But then I see "You bled with Wallace... Now bleed with me..."

And i'm in a conundrum again...

[Rynie]

Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki

George Romero's "Land of the Dead" was a big disapointment for me.

Very big.

.

How? Every Romero movie is the EXACT SAME.

[Diogenes]

Originally Posted by MonsterD

Not reading the whole thread, except the complete stupidity about how being anti- English Patient makes some in here feel manly or whatever.

I didn't read a single post that even intimated such a thought. As a matter of fact, personally, I have a ton of favorite movies that while not "chick flicks" wouldn't be considered "manly" movies either. Two examples I can think of are Sophie's Choice and The Color Purple.

I simply found The English Patient to be boring.

[Rynie]

I find it crazy that the Coen brothers can make GREAT movies like The Big Lebowski and the True Grit re-make, then turn around and make movies like Burn After Reading and this...LITERALLY THE MOST GARBAGE MOVIE EVER.

[Diogenes]

Originally Posted by Rynie

I find it crazy that the Coen brothers can make GREAT movies like The Big Lebowski and the True Grit re-make, then turn around and make movies like Burn After Reading and this...LITERALLY THE MOST GARBAGE MOVIE EVER.

I haven't seen A Serious Man, Rynie but you are so right about Burn After Reading. It blew. It was like they didn't even try.

[Rynie]

Originally Posted by Diogenes

I haven't seen A Serious Man, Rynie but you are so right about Burn After Reading. It blew. It was like they didn't even try.

They are so hit-and-miss it's not even funny. If you're feeling masochistic, watch A serious man. I didn't even make it to the 20 minute mark.

This made me think of another TERRIBLE movie: The Men Who Stare at Goats.

Walked out.

[dexternjack]

Originally Posted by Diogenes

I didn't read a single post that even intimated such a thought. As a matter of fact, personally, I have a ton of favorite movies that while not "chick flicks" wouldn't be considered "manly" movies either. Two examples I can think of are Sophie's Choice and The Color Purple.

I simply found The English Patient to be boring.

I mentioned the English Patient first. I thought it was a snoozefest and a bad movie. I never implied it was bad because it was a chick-flick and I wanted to seem more manly. No one else did either.

It is amazing what some people gather from rather simple posts or topics. Me saying a movie was boring and bad = I am a manly man and will not watch a chick-flick, wow.