Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2013   #31
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

If we're going OL early, this is the type of guy I would want. A G/RT swing who plays guard initially and sticks there for 10 years because he's so dominant or a guy who could replace Free at RT down the road. A potential Alex Boone, Josh Sitton or Marshal Yanda type.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #32
Aliencowboy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
411
Default

If Lane Johnson isn't there, I'd love to pick him at 18.
Watch Fluker against LSU and Bark or watch him
manhandle Jenkins#6 in the Georgia match. He'll do fine
in the NFL at RT. He'd be an instant Pro Bowler at G.

This guy has great football instincts and I've never seen
a college tackle be as dominant as he is in the running game.
Take him at 18 without a doubt. He'd bring an attitude to
the OL it hasn't seen in a decade.




[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcuejIQ-6tU"]
Aliencowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #33
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jterrell View Post
then we shouldn't ask him to block anyone 40 yards down field??

that's a very weak complaint imho.
The forty is a general indicator of quickness/athleticism. I would prefer 10-yard time, but it's not always available.

I just look for the measureables to match what I see in game footage when comparing players. Measureables aren't the end-all-be-all but they can be informative.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #34
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliencowboy View Post
[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcuejIQ-6tU"]

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013   #35
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Even if Fluker can play RT in the NFL, I would expect him to be much better at OG. If the Cowboys were running a power-man blocking scheme, then I would be in favor of drafting him as a Guard.

Fluker going against Mingo in college is different than Fluker against Mingo in the NFL. NFL defenses are more complex in terms of blitzing, etc.. Also, pass-rushing against Alabama was difficult because defenses had to make stopping the run the top priority. That will not happen consistently in the NFL. There will be games in the NFL where the pass-rushers can just Tee-off on rushing the QB. College defenses rarely, if ever, did that to Alabama.

I see Fluker as a less athletic Leonard Davis. A guy that was a disappointment at OT but dominant as a Guard in a power-man blocking scheme (until the got too fat).

Either way, it's all opinion. It will be fun to come back and revisit this in a year.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013   #36
jterrell
Penguinite
 
jterrell's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
16,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
great link man, thanks!
jterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013   #37
newlander
Senior Member
 
newlander's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2006
Posts:
7,660
Default man....

what the HECK are some of you watching? This guy was DOMINANT in the SEC...I mean, he isn't perfect but who is? I'd be a tad nervous at 18 but a trade down to 23ish and he could be had plus the extra picks: just a thought.
newlander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013   #38
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,042
Default

I understand that Fluker doesn't fit the zone blocking scheme, but the two free agents that Dallas signed last year was not zone blocking linemen. As I said in a previous post, when players such as Warmack, Warford and Fluker don't fit the scheme, the scheme needs to go. I don't care about linemen blocking at the second level when they can't get a push and block at the first level. Dallas tried these small quick linemen and found out that they get no push at the LOS. The lack of size and power is one reason that the Cowboys can't run the ball in the red zone. 290lb linemen just can't get it done IMO.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #39
Gaede
Senior Member
 
Gaede's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Kingston Canada
Posts:
6,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
I understand that Fluker doesn't fit the zone blocking scheme, but the two free agents that Dallas signed last year was not zone blocking linemen. As I said in a previous post, when players such as Warmack, Warford and Fluker don't fit the scheme, the scheme needs to go. I don't care about linemen blocking at the second level when they can't get a push and block at the first level. Dallas tried these small quick linemen and found out that they get no push at the LOS. The lack of size and power is one reason that the Cowboys can't run the ball in the red zone. 290lb linemen just can't get it done IMO.
Exactly.

Give me a line with the likes of Warford, Warmack or Fluker and I'll actually be excited for the next season.

This team is deficient in strength.
Gaede is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #40
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
I understand that Fluker doesn't fit the zone blocking scheme, but the two free agents that Dallas signed last year was not zone blocking linemen. As I said in a previous post, when players such as Warmack, Warford and Fluker don't fit the scheme, the scheme needs to go. I don't care about linemen blocking at the second level when they can't get a push and block at the first level. Dallas tried these small quick linemen and found out that they get no push at the LOS. The lack of size and power is one reason that the Cowboys can't run the ball in the red zone. 290lb linemen just can't get it done IMO.
I think Livings and Bernadeau were not the Cowboys first choices. The cap penalty, the Carr signing and the 29.77M of dead-money might have caused the Cowboys to just grab some bodies to fill out the roster.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #41
InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,239
Default

He looks like Mo Collins to me, and Mo Collins did pretty well as a right guard for Callahan.

Despite labeling myself a "realist", no one understands my pain or appreciates my special truth. Stupid world.
InmanRoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #42
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
 
CATCH17's Avatar
Years Donated
2010, 2011, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
25,180
Default

Im not down on Fluker at all but it's crazy talk to want him in the 1st round.
CATCH17 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #43
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
I think Livings and Bernadeau were not the Cowboys first choices. The cap penalty, the Carr signing and the 29.77M of dead-money might have caused the Cowboys to just grab some bodies to fill out the roster.
I don't think there was many options other than draft some linemen or high price FAs. Draft is out of the question if you look at recent history.

Last edited by jnday : 02-05-2013 at 01:54 PM.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #44
jnday
Senior Member
 
jnday's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2010
Posts:
4,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xwalker View Post
I think Livings and Bernadeau were not the Cowboys first choices. The cap penalty, the Carr signing and the 29.77M of dead-money might have caused the Cowboys to just grab some bodies to fill out the roster.
You may be right, but it was reported that these two were hand picked by Callahan as guys that would play well despite their history of being jags.

There are some comparisons between Fluker and Flozell. If so, I want him. I was Flozell fan. Some may disagree, but this line needs some of that.
jnday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013   #45
xwalker
Senior Member
 
xwalker's Avatar
 
Joined:
Dec 2005
Posts:
4,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnday View Post
You may be right, but it was reported that these two were hand picked by Callahan as guys that would play well despite their history of being jags.

There are some comparisons between Fluker and Flozell. If so, I want him. I was Flozell fan. Some may disagree, but this line needs some of that.
I think the "hand picked" report was a bit misleading. It's not as if they said, here pick the 2 best FA Guards. It was more like, pick the 2 best out of the bargain bin.

I don't see any similarity between Fluker and Flozell. Flozell had elite quickness. Flozell was a 5-time Pro Bowl LT and 1-time All-Pro. I don't think anybody is projecting Fluker to LT.

.

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Half of the population has below average intelligence.
xwalker is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com