
|
02-04-2013
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jul 2010 |
Posts: | 1,256 |
|
Does the 49er d performance change what Dallas should do?
The 49ers front 7 is great. It has no holes. They have 2 beastly inside linebackers that can defend the run and pass. They are protected by one of the top 5 inside players in fooseball with Justin Smith. They have a good athletic nose with Sopanga. Ray McDonald is a very good defensive end that plays the run well and has decent pass rush. They have additional good players that rotate in those position. They have Ahmad Brooks who is a very good $7-8mm per year player that is similar to Spencer with a little less pass rush. They have a pass rushing beast in Aldon Smith. They have competent safety play with Whitner and Goldson. Their corners are okay. Culliver is usually good, Tarrell Brown is okay and Rogers is okay.
Yet they just gave up huge qb ratings and yards in back to back games of championship football.
With the rules today should teams like the Cowboys just go all in on offense and draft offensive linemen and receivers?
2 years ago, I would not have thought so, but I'm coming around to believing this is the case.
The QB salary inflation in a no cap growth world is going to cause a defense to have some hole and the offense will just attack the weak areas.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#2
|
|
Intramural Legend
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Canandaigua, NY |
Posts: | 12,832 |
|
The 49ers defensive personnel isn't as good as you make it out to be, imo.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | May 2008 |
Posts: | 134 |
|
Seemed like they gave up alot of points 2nd half of season
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 4,483 |
|
one can find flaws in any offensive or defensive unit and any unit may not perform up to expectation on a given day
the key is to be balanced and disciplined
most significant needs are:
1) OL
2) defensive front 7
3) safety
4) emphasis no STs
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2008 |
Location: | Lewisville, Tx. |
Posts: | 1,623 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Future
The 49ers defensive personnel isn't as good as you make it out to be, imo.
|
Agree. Solid front 7, medicore secondary.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Posts: | 4,722 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboysooner
The 49ers front 7 is great. It has no holes. They have 2 beastly inside linebackers that can defend the run and pass. They are protected by one of the top 5 inside players in fooseball with Justin Smith. They have a good athletic nose with Sopanga. Ray McDonald is a very good defensive end that plays the run well and has decent pass rush. They have additional good players that rotate in those position. They have Ahmad Brooks who is a very good $7-8mm per year player that is similar to Spencer with a little less pass rush. They have a pass rushing beast in Aldon Smith. They have competent safety play with Whitner and Goldson. Their corners are okay. Culliver is usually good, Tarrell Brown is okay and Rogers is okay.
Yet they just gave up huge qb ratings and yards in back to back games of championship football.
With the rules today should teams like the Cowboys just go all in on offense and draft offensive linemen and receivers?
[View Full Quote]2 years ago, I would not have thought so, but I'm coming around to believing this is the case.
The QB salary inflation in a no cap growth world is going to cause a defense to have some hole and the offense will just attack the weak areas.
|
Front 7:
Difference between Cowboys and 49ers = X.
OLine:
Difference between Cowboys and 49ers = 10X.
You don’t know what you don’t know.
Half of the population has below average intelligence.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 226 |
|
No, but the Ravens O-Line should. Shows what a big, talented offensive line can mean for an above average QB. The Baltimore O-line won that game imo.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 628 |
|
Well, no team plays lights out every game. The niners D is good, but I think a lot of their flaws are in the secondary(overrated). They have an ok front 7 with some beasts in there. Stop their pass rush, beat their defense, as they have a lot of head hunters in the secondary, and corners who's flaws are masked by the front 7.
If you build it, he will run...
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Feb 2005 |
Location: | NC |
Posts: | 2,780 |
|
This game emphasized the ESSENTIAL need for the Cowboys to address the offensive line!
Next, defensive line and S need to be addressed. LB core will need some attention outside of Lee and Carter.
RB, veteran WR and TE depth would round out the needs in my view.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Houston, Texas |
Posts: | 70,365 |
|
No I think what Jason wants to do is have an offense with balance in the running and passing game and a solid defense who can make plays.
Both SF and Balt fit that. Neither offense is the greatest show on turf they are solid offense that can run and pass the ball and their defenses are good soild units that make plays.
Adrian Peterson: Playing in the NFL is like "modern-day slavery"
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#11
|
|
To The Moon
Joined: | Oct 2004 |
Location: | Blairsville, PA |
Posts: | 8,574 |
|
Doomsday... balance is key. I agree. Don't know bout you, but I'm already jonesing for the upcoming season.
DESTINATION... END ZONE!!! 
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Jan 2008 |
Location: | Peterborough, UK |
Posts: | 385 |
|
The best defensive teams do one of two things (or maybe both).
Create Turnovers, and give their offense more opportunities to score.
Prevent the opposition from scoring Touchdowns. You can give up yards if you can create a stop when it comes to the redzone.
I don't know the stats for all teams, but I never got the feeling that we were
a) going to score a TD when we got in the redzone
or
b) hold our opponents to a FG (or better still create a turnover), when they got into the redzone.
Take the Ravens, there was a stat in the first half yesterday that came up that said they had scored a TD on something like 10 consecutive redzone visits.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Parts Unknown, M |
Posts: | 1,164 |
|
Their front 7 had a lousy playoff run.Really didn't stop anybody
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 23,315 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gameover
Their front 7 had a lousy playoff run.Really didn't stop anybody
|
They locked down Atl in the 2nd half to get to the SB.
|
|
|
02-04-2013
|
#15
|
|
Illegitimi non carborundum
Years Donated 2004, 2007, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Granbury, Texas |
Posts: | 9,086 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKCowboysFan
The best defensive teams do one of two things (or maybe both).
Create Turnovers, and give their offense more opportunities to score.
Prevent the opposition from scoring Touchdowns. You can give up yards if you can create a stop when it comes to the redzone.
I don't know the stats for all teams, but I never got the feeling that we were
a) going to score a TD when we got in the redzone
or
b) hold our opponents to a FG (or better still create a turnover), when they got into the redzone.
Take the Ravens, there was a stat in the first half yesterday that came up that said they had scored a TD on something like 10 consecutive redzone visits.
|
I believe it was ten consecutive visits inside the 10 yard line, but I could be wrong. Anyway, I agree with your point.

mahalo nui loa, Juke
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.
|