Spencer discussion

[starfrombirth]

In todays "immediate gratification" mentality it makes sense to keep Spencer in the fold but the reality is... not so fast. Is Spencer a tier A free agent? I submit to you that he is not. Is he good? Absolutely but he is not great. He has the nickname "Almost Anthony" for a reason. For every year of his career here except for this one we as a fanbase have bemoaned how he can't help Ware rush the passer. So, in this, his contract year, we are supposed to believe that he has turned the corner and will now play lights out and earn his money on an ongoing basis? We haven't had the best of luck in that area recently. I'm sorry but I'm not "sucked" as Coach Parcells once said.

More importantly, lets say that he does play lights out for the term of his contract. Is he the final piece to the Superbowl puzzle? Not even close. We still need dline, oline, and possibly safety, and to a lesser extent corner. How much does he add to our already overburdened contract situation? Even with everybody restructuring we still have to pay for a 1st rnd dlineman or olineman. No matter what, we will have to pay for the draft class coming in and thats expensive in the total.

Does Spencer set the edge? Yes, probably as good or better than anyone else at his position but that's not enough to offset the marginal difference that a much lower paid player will make and the talent the we need at other positions. If he takes a great deal then this is all different but I don't think he will. He will take the money and run and I think that's the best thing for us in the short term and long.

[ufcrules1]

Originally Posted by starfrombirth

In todays "immediate gratification" mentality it makes sense to keep Spencer in the fold but the reality is... not so fast. Is Spencer a tier A free agent? I submit to you that he is not. Is he good? Absolutely but he is not great. He has the nickname "Almost Anthony" for a reason. For every year of his career here except for this one we as a fanbase have bemoaned how he can't help Ware rush the passer. So, in this, his contract year, we are supposed to believe that he has turned the corner and will now play lights out and earn his money on an ongoing basis? We haven't had the best of luck in that area recently. I'm sorry but I'm not "sucked" as Coach Parcells once said.

[View Full Quote]More importantly, lets say that he does play lights out for the term of his contract. Is he the final piece to the Superbowl puzzle? Not even close. We still need dline, oline, and possibly safety, and to a lesser extent corner. How much does he add to our already overburdened contract situation? Even with everybody restructuring we still have to pay for a 1st rnd dlineman or olineman. No matter what, we will have to pay for the draft class coming in and thats expensive in the total.

Does Spencer set the edge? Yes, probably as good or better than anyone else at his position but that's not enough to offset the marginal difference that a much lower paid player will make and the talent the we need at other positions. If he takes a great deal then this is all different but I don't think he will. He will take the money and run and I think that's the best thing for us in the short term and long.

Excellent post man!

[Nation]

They aren't re-signing him. In the past whenever they've actually cared about keeping a player it has been done before this point.

[Titleist]

Originally Posted by Nation

They aren't re-signing him. In the past whenever they've actually cared about keeping a player it has been done before this point.

Exactly. No way they resign Spencer.

[DBOY3141]

We should not. We can get 3 solid players for the price of him. He is not an All Pro and shouldn't be paid like one.

Take that money and sign Brandon Moore, blocking TE and a ST ace. Use the draft to build the OL and DL.

We will be fine without Spencer.

[AMERICAS_FAN]

He's defenitely a tier-A free agent, Yes he wants to return, and Yes the team wants to resign him, as they should.

No, "almost Anthony" is NOT his nickname among his peers; that came from outsiders, like fans here who don't realize how often he played in coverage as they criticize him from not rushing the passer enough.

He's among the best at sealing the edge and stuffing the run (let's not understimate the importance of that in his LDE position). And when he is asked to rush the passer - and not worry about coverage - he's at least good for an instant pressure, if not a sack.

[CopenhagenCowboy]

Originally Posted by starfrombirth

In todays "immediate gratification" mentality it makes sense to keep Spencer in the fold but the reality is... not so fast. Is Spencer a tier A free agent? I submit to you that he is not. Is he good? Absolutely but he is not great. He has the nickname "Almost Anthony" for a reason. For every year of his career here except for this one we as a fanbase have bemoaned how he can't help Ware rush the passer. So, in this, his contract year, we are supposed to believe that he has turned the corner and will now play lights out and earn his money on an ongoing basis? We haven't had the best of luck in that area recently. I'm sorry but I'm not "sucked" as Coach Parcells once said.

[View Full Quote]More importantly, lets say that he does play lights out for the term of his contract. Is he the final piece to the Superbowl puzzle? Not even close. We still need dline, oline, and possibly safety, and to a lesser extent corner. How much does he add to our already overburdened contract situation? Even with everybody restructuring we still have to pay for a 1st rnd dlineman or olineman. No matter what, we will have to pay for the draft class coming in and thats expensive in the total.

Does Spencer set the edge? Yes, probably as good or better than anyone else at his position but that's not enough to offset the marginal difference that a much lower paid player will make and the talent the we need at other positions. If he takes a great deal then this is all different but I don't think he will. He will take the money and run and I think that's the best thing for us in the short term and long.

What a great post!

Seriously, I won't give him the money he expects even if he repeats his 2012 form five years in a row. Just say no, let him have his payday somewhere else. Upgrade others areas for the same amount of money. And get younger in the process.

[Manwiththeplan]

I do agree that it makes sense to resign Anthony Spencer if you have an instant gratification mind set, but I also believe that's how this team should be thinking.

Right now we have a soon to be 33 year old QB, so to me we have 2-3 years max to win a super bowl and anything beyond that window doesn't matter to me, because barring a QB "falling" in our lap like Romo did, hard times are coming. And times may be a bit harder if we resign Spencer, but make no mistake hard times are coming.

Letting Spencer walk, is the beggining of the end, of giving up on this core. And some may say we should be giving up on them now, but hiring a 76 year old defensive coordinator and extending a 33 year old QB (hasn't happened yet but will) says otherwise.

[Zimmy Lives]

Originally Posted by CopenhagenCowboy

What a great post!

Seriously, I won't give him the money he expects even if he repeats his 2012 form five years in a row. Just say no, let him have his payday somewhere else. Upgrade others areas for the same amount of money. And get younger in the process.

Dallas needs/wants Spencer but I just don't see it. They have to get rid of some high-priced baggage before they can consider it.

Who is more valuable, Spencer or Ratliff? Tough call.

[Bowdown27]

I honestly think it all depends on marinelli and kiffin. Do they want him back ? Do they think he can provide us what is needed in the 4-3? I don't want to break the bank on him honestly. I rather draft a guy or get Melton in the fold which maybe what marinelli has in mind

[irishline]

Originally Posted by Nation

They aren't re-signing him. In the past whenever they've actually cared about keeping a player it has been done before this point.

Doug Free says hello. Though that is the perfect example of why NOT to sign Spencer long term.

[Flinger]

Anthony Spencer is one of the best SOLB's in the league. Has been for years. Your premise is only based upon sacks, not system and his performance in that system.

He is not "Almost Anthony". That is someone's cute idea of words to define someone in their image.

He was a DE in college. In the 4-3 system, word around town is that he may even be better at LDE than he was last year.

So, we create a weakness by eliminating one of the top 5 to 10 guys in the entire NFL at his position so that the money can be divided in half to get 2 guys with potential?

Sorry - we need his talent.

If he were to leave, then people will be complaining about the no names we have a LDE and SAM backer and why we didn't draft well, or didn't get the right FA or why our known deficiency in the DL wasn't addressed.

I swear, some people are just never happy with anything...

[Nation]

Originally Posted by irishline

Doug Free says hello. Though that is the perfect example of why NOT to sign Spencer long term.

That was because he was entering free agency in the lockout season. But tell him I say hi back and that I hope he gets cut.

[AMERICAS_FAN]

Originally Posted by Flinger

Anthony Spencer is one of the best SOLB's in the league. Has been for years. Your premise is only based upon sacks, not system and his performance in that system.

He is not "Almost Anthony". That is someone's cute idea of words to define someone in their image.

He was a DE in college. In the 4-3 system, word around town is that he may even be better at LDE than he was last year.

So, we create a weakness by eliminating one of the top 5 to 10 guys in the entire NFL at his position so that the money can be divided in half to get 2 guys with potential?

Sorry - we need his talent.

If he were to leave, then people will be complaining about the no names we have a LDE and SAM backer and why we didn't draft well, or didn't get the right FA or why our known deficiency in the DL wasn't addressed.

I swear, some people are just never happy with anything...

Now THIS is an excellent post! There are 5 marquee positions in the NFL, regardless of scheme. They are, in no particular order, QB, LT, RB, DE/OLB and WR.

We have a chance to have 2 solid bookend DEs - TWO, at a marquee position - and the suggestion in this thread is to let Spencer go, on the FALSE basis that he is not a good player?

Unbelievable!

[Flinger]

Originally Posted by AMERICAS_FAN

Now THIS is an excellent post! There are 5 marquee positions in the NFL, regardless of scheme. They are, in no particular order, QB, LT, RB, DE/OLB and WR.

We have a chance to have 2 solid bookend DEs - TWO, at a marquee position - and the suggestion in this thread is to let Spencer go, on the FALSE basis that he is not a good player?

Unbelievable!

Obviously, we are in violent agreement...

But, I would add that most coaches will put the CB in that top 5 marquee positions...

Combined with your top 5, I would submit we have a pretty good core if we can keep Spencer....