Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2005   #1
Vman
Senior Member
 
Vman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Maryland
Posts:
315
Default Dallas Draft Grade : WashingtonPost (??)

Jealousy.....I love it.

Dallas

Grade B : First-rounders Demarcus Ware and Marcus Spears and second-rounder Kevin Burnett instantly upgrade the defense, but the Cowboys also needed help at receiver and on the offensive line.


They just couldn't give it an 'A'. It's such a bitter pill to swallow.
Vman is offline  

Old 04-25-2005   #2
Dayton Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Dayton Cowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Dayton, OH
Posts:
1,843
Default

what did the post give the 'skins for a draft grade?
Dayton Cowboy is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #3
k19
Senior Member
 
k19's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,954
Default

They gave us an A- in 02
k19 is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #4
k19
Senior Member
 
k19's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton_Cowboy
what did the post give the 'skins for a draft grade?
C-

Washington
C- This team lost games because of its offense last season, and did nothing to upgrade the unit. The No. 1 wide receiver that it desperately needs fell into its lap when Mike Williams was available for the No. 9 pick, but the Redskins took Carlos Rogers to replace departed CB Fred Smoot. They again passed up wide receiver help at No. 25 to choose Jason Campbell, a quarterback who will be of no immediate help to the club's not-exactly-youthful offensive coaches.
k19 is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #5
k19
Senior Member
 
k19's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,954
Default

They lost ALL credability with this one though..........


Green Bay
A It's better to be lucky than good, and the Packers got the heir apparent to QB Brett Favre when Aaron Rodgers plummeted to them at No. 24.
k19 is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #6
Dayton Cowboy
Senior Member
 
Dayton Cowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Dayton, OH
Posts:
1,843
Default

do you have the link for this K19?
Dayton Cowboy is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #7
SilverStarCowboy
The Actualist
 
SilverStarCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2005
Posts:
6,018
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman
Jealousy.....I love it.

Dallas

Grade B : First-rounders Demarcus Ware and Marcus Spears and second-rounder Kevin Burnett instantly upgrade the defense, but the Cowboys also needed help at receiver and on the offensive line.

They just couldn't give it an 'A'. It's such a bitter pill to swallow.

OMG! A grade B is just a biased insult.

LMAO!! They actually believe what they print?


Can't wait untill Marcus Spears hits the field, mark it, he will end up being the most dominant player in the entire Draft.
SilverStarCowboy is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #8
Vman
Senior Member
 
Vman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Maryland
Posts:
315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton_Cowboy
do you have the link for this K19?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...hotsheet25.htm
Vman is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #9
k19
Senior Member
 
k19's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton_Cowboy
do you have the link for this K19?

I always do

Heres the 05 link
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...hotsheet25.htm

and the 02 A
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../scorecard.htm
k19 is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #10
TheHustler
Senior Member
 
TheHustler's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
5,390
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k19
They lost ALL credability with this one though..........


Green Bay
A It's better to be lucky than good, and the Packers got the heir apparent to QB Brett Favre when Aaron Rodgers plummeted to them at No. 24.
Why? No one thought Rodgers would slip that far.
TheHustler is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #11
k19
Senior Member
 
k19's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
2,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHustler
Why? No one thought Rodgers would slip that far.

This is based on their ENTIRE draft. So they get an A as a whole because they took a QB that fell to 20 something? Where would Rodgers have gone last year? Sure wouldnt have been a top 10 pick in 04.


Heres a read from another rag on GB's draft.......

Quote:
Analysis: Drafting Rodgers might be good in the long run for the Packers, but in the short term, this draft was a disaster for the Packers. Rodgers won't help Green Bay right away. Collins is talented, but coming from one of the weaker leagues in I-AA, is bound to be raw. Murphy, the Pack’s final pick of the first day, won't be taking any reps from Javon Walker and/or Donald Driver. The franchise waited until the fourth round to address huge needs at safety, linebacker, and guard, and paid little attention to upgrading a so-so front four. For a team that made little noise in the free agent game, this past weekend could easily be construed as a failure.

Bottom Line: Apart from Rodgers, who won't see the field any time soon, it is hard to find the logic in most of these picks.

Grade: D
[View Full Quote]
k19 is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #12
Dale
Forum Architect
 
Dale's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
San Antonio, TX
Posts:
4,709
Send a message via AIM to Dale
Default

Probably feeling a little pressure not to trash the 'Skins too much while singing the Cowboys' praises. After all, they've got to sell those papers in the nation's capitol.
Dale is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #13
Vman
Senior Member
 
Vman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Maryland
Posts:
315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale
Probably feeling a little pressure not to trash the 'Skins too much while singing the Cowboys' praises. After all, they've got to sell those papers in the nation's capitol.
And remember, Dale, Danny Boy took several tickets away from the Post in the past for reporting negatively on the team (and Danny's lack of GM skills).

Although Danny said it was because the Post was reselling them....
Vman is offline  
Old 04-25-2005   #14
speedkilz88
Senior Member
 
speedkilz88's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
18,304
Default

I have a problem when they say "they didn't fill this position" and don't say if there actually was better player at the position they didn't get. If your going to grade a team, grade them on what they got and maybe what they could have gotten.
speedkilz88 is online now  
Old 04-25-2005   #15
Mike 1967
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Austin, Texas
Posts:
2,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman
Jealousy.....I love it.

Dallas

Grade B : First-rounders Demarcus Ware and Marcus Spears and second-rounder Kevin Burnett instantly upgrade the defense, but the Cowboys also needed help at receiver and on the offensive line.


They just couldn't give it an 'A'. It's such a bitter pill to swallow.
hmmmm

I thought a draft grade was directly related to the draft picks themselves.....not to the needs of the team.

Using this formula....then teams withoout holes would automatically have good draft grades.
is my Lord

Mike 1967
Mike 1967 is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com