Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2004 Archives

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 06-09-2005   #1
Banned_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Location:
On Tony Romo's B
Posts:
5,834
Default What are possible trades ...

That could be made by the Cowboys this year given our personnel?

And/or, if you had your choice what kind of trade would you make?
Banned_n_austin is offline  

Old 06-09-2005   #2
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

I could see us trading Ellis. Or making a trade for a WR.
Nors is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #3
stag hunter
Hater
 
Joined:
May 2004
Location:
The Land of Plea
Posts:
603
Default

I think we are right where we want to be, personell wise. I could see glover being moved after this year because he is not the prototypical dt for a 3-4, but I think parcells wants to keep him now during the transition because he's proven himself trustworthy and he wants to maintain some continuity in the box from last year. In my mind, there are no players that are on the trading block right now around the league that suit our needs enough to give up one of our guys for.

Love the sig
stag hunter is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #4
Chief
"Friggin Joke Monkey"
 
Chief's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
On the Rio Grand
Posts:
8,541
Default

With the human trade rumor -- Dexter Coakley -- gone, it's hard to imagine anyone else being shipped.

"That's the fastest-running, slowest-walking guy I've ever seen."

-- Matt Millen on Tony Dorsett
Chief is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #5
Banned_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Location:
On Tony Romo's B
Posts:
5,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
I could see us trading Ellis. Or making a trade for a WR.

I could see us trading Ellis, but for who? If we traded Ellis our DE rotation wouldn't be as deep ... and if we did trade Ellis, Glover may play some DE.

I also don't agree with the assesment that Glover can't play NT in the 3-4. You don't have to be a fat ace there, you just have to take on the double teams and be a force against the run.
Banned_n_austin is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #6
Banned_n_austin
Banned
 
Joined:
Aug 2004
Location:
On Tony Romo's B
Posts:
5,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stag hunter
I think we are right where we want to be, personell wise. I could see glover being moved after this year because he is not the prototypical dt for a 3-4, but I think parcells wants to keep him now during the transition because he's proven himself trustworthy and he wants to maintain some continuity in the box from last year. In my mind, there are no players that are on the trading block right now around the league that suit our needs enough to give up one of our guys for.

Love the sig
The only reason I think there may be a possible trade is because we have so many DE's.
Banned_n_austin is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #7
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief
With the human trade rumor -- Dexter Coakley -- gone, it's hard to imagine anyone else being shipped.
No one will be. I doubt anyone is even shopped.
Hostile is online now  
Old 06-09-2005   #8
StonetheCrow77
Senior Member
 
StonetheCrow77's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
858
Default

ok... Glover and Ellis aren't going any where...
StonetheCrow77 is online now  
Old 06-09-2005   #9
junk
I've got moxie
 
junk's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
9,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Banned_n_austin
I could see us trading Ellis, but for who? If we traded Ellis our DE rotation wouldn't be as deep ... and if we did trade Ellis, Glover may play some DE.

I also don't agree with the assesment that Glover can't play NT in the 3-4. You don't have to be a fat ace there, you just have to take on the double teams and be a force against the run.
I doubt there would be much market for Ellis. Howard couldn't get dealt. Nobody is interested in Alexander, James, etc. I think the trade market is pretty thin.
junk is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #10
Nors
Banned
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
22,015
Default

I have 2nd hand knowledge that Ellis has been on the block leading up to draft. Chances of him getting moved - Low.

He and Glover are valuable rotation guys who can play some 4-3 looks. Key here is Canty's recovery. He's ready day 1 we are wise to move Ellis for a WR if we could puul it off. Look for teams deep at WR. Cardinals? Pats? Rams?

Ellis for Sean McDonald and a 3rd in a heartbeat.
Nors is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #11
Hostile
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
117,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nors
I have 2nd hand knowledge that Ellis has been on the block leading up to draft. Chances of him getting moved - Low.

He and Glover are valuable rotation guys who can play some 4-3 looks. Key here is Canty's recovery. He's ready day 1 we are wise to move Ellis for a WR if we could puul it off. Look for teams deep at WR. Cardinals? Pats? Rams?

Ellis for Sean McDonald and a 3rd in a heartbeat.
Nope.
Hostile is online now  
Old 06-09-2005   #12
StonetheCrow77
Senior Member
 
StonetheCrow77's Avatar
 
Joined:
Jan 2005
Posts:
858
Default

why would Ellis be on the trade block after he signed a 7 year extension in 03?? makes no sense...
StonetheCrow77 is online now  
Old 06-09-2005   #13
jksmith269
Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Years Donated
2005, 2008
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
In My own Mind j
Posts:
3,898
Send a message via Yahoo to jksmith269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
No one will be. I doubt anyone is even shopped.
According to Jim Rome (who I can't stand) We had a deal almost done sending Glover to Detroit on draft day. but again its just something he reported a few days after the draft.

I could see Glover being traded considering He's set to make 4.5mil in base salary next season (06). More than likely this would be his last season here anyway so why not trade him while his value is still fairly high. Now what could you get for him is the question? If we could get a third and fifth for him next year I'd do it
jksmith269 is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #14
big dog cowboy
THE BIG DOG
 
big dog cowboy's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Ahhhhh Kansas
Posts:
42,817
Default

These trade Ellis and trade Glover threads are getting old. Neither is going anywhere. We finally get some decent depth on our D-line and people start thinking all kinds of crazy thoughts. The key to the success of our D during the super bowl run in the 90's was our depth along the line. We had a hella good pass rushing DE and enough depth to keep coming after our opponets all game long. Depth - it's a good thing.

This is a team who is battling several major injuries to
key players including Pro Bowl talents like Lee, Austin, Jenkins, Murray,
Carter and Ratliff. Other key starters missing include Costa, Smith, Church and
Coleman. That is 11 key players - that's half the starting lineup. Yet we still went 8-8.
big dog cowboy is offline  
Old 06-09-2005   #15
Yeagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yeagermeister's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
47,537
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jksmith269
According to Jim Rome (who I can't stand) We had a deal almost done sending Glover to Detroit on draft day. but again its just something he reported a few days after the draft.

I could see Glover being traded considering He's set to make 4.5mil in base salary next season (06). More than likely this would be his last season here anyway so why not trade him while his value is still fairly high. Now what could you get for him is the question? If we could get a third and fifth for him next year I'd do it
I'd believe Nors before Rome
RIP Weldon "Pops" Parkhill....I will miss you my friend
R.I.P. Renee I miss you sis
Yeagermeister is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com