NFC East ranking - Dallas Cowboys Forum

**jobberone** · 07-12-2004

Here is one ranking for the order of finish for the NFC East with present "chances".

Philadelphia Eagles 2.3
Washington Redskins 2.9
Dallas Cowboys 3.1
New York Giants 4.5

I found it interesting the Skins were rated over the Cowboys although there is not much difference.

Brokejumper · 07-12-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by jobberone

Here is one ranking for the order of finish for the NFC East with present "chances".

Philadelphia Eagles 2.3
Washington Redskins 2.9
Dallas Cowboys 3.1
New York Giants 4.5

I found it interesting the Skins were rated over the Cowboys although there is not much difference.

I am amazed at this really... I would like to see the Skins put it together on the field for once in recent memory before I place them above anyone.

crazylegs · 07-13-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by jobberone

Here is one ranking for the order of finish for the NFC East with present "chances".

Philadelphia Eagles 2.3
Washington Redskins 2.9
Dallas Cowboys 3.1
New York Giants 4.5

I found it interesting the Skins were rated over the Cowboys although there is not much difference.

?

It's just a typing error for Washington, that should of been .29 (as in the blood alcohol level of the sports writer).

Please move along, nothing to see here!

Eagles-UK · 07-13-2004

All this skins talk is annoying me

they haven't been good in years and until they start winning some games they should stay where they are, 3rd in the division

Tio · 07-13-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eagles-UK

All this skins talk is annoying me

they haven't been good in years and until they start winning some games they should stay where they are, 3rd in the division

Something everyone can agree with.

**jobberone** · 07-13-2004

And although they certainly aren't predictive and they certainly will change I still found it interesting that those who seem to get it right a lot have Washington slightly favored over us.

It might not mean anythihg to you and it certainly may not come to pass but I found it very interesting. Actually I found it a little shocking.

What are they seeing I'm not?

You can make light of it but I do listen.

**BrAinPaiNt** · 07-13-2004

Washington has banana pants for washington for two reasons....Portis and Gibbs.

Really that is the only major positive change that has been made....and with what Bill did last year with the cowboys...anything is possible....I just think they will be third.

I stick with how it finished last year.

**MichaelWinicki** · 07-13-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrAinPaiNt

Washington has banana pants for washington for two reasons....Portis and Gibbs.

Really that is the only major positive change that has been made....and with what Bill did last year with the cowboys...anything is possible....I just think they will be third.

I stick with how it finished last year.

And you look at the negative changes that were made. Springs isn't Champ Bailey, and they still do not have anything that resembles a pass rush except for a little push from Arrington.

Cheap Shot Artist · 07-13-2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelWinicki

And you look at the negative changes that were made. Springs isn't Champ Bailey, and they still do not have anything that resembles a pass rush except for a little push from Arrington.

(Much like our team), if the Skins OL comes together, Brunell plays to at least his career QB rating and most importantly Portis proves he wasnt the beneficiary of the worst defensive division in the NFL, the Skins will score points in bunches

They still have pro bowler in Coles and a solid-plus type WR in Gardner

I see their D in similar regards as our '02 team

All the Gibbs has been out of football since his last season in '92 crap cracks me up..he's a winner at whatever he does