
|
07-30-2004
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
With respect to the press conference, I found it
interesting that Bill said that every position on the roster has competition this year (or something along those lines), except Safety.
I think he then added that we have some "options" . . . . I am assuming it's with respect to that position.
BP admitted that with Woody that if there was any way for Woody to be ready, that he would be. Woody is that type of competitor. But obviously BP also "suggested" that maybe things with Woody's injury may not work out.
Given all of this, what are the chances of bringing in some competition fairly soon at Safety for Dixon and Davis?
(Also, didn't BP say that Lynn Scott was primarily a Special Teams guy?)
I can't believe that BP wouldn't hedge himself in case there were complications with Woody's injury or simply that Dixon could not cement down the position.
Opinions?
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#2
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Woods
interesting that Bill said that every position on the roster has competition this year (or something along those lines), except Safety.
I think he then added that we have some "options" . . . . I am assuming it's with respect to that position.
BP admitted that with Woody that if there was any way for Woody to be ready, that he would be. Woody is that type of competitor. But obviously BP also "suggested" that maybe things with Woody's injury may not work out.
Given all of this, what are the chances of bringing in some competition fairly soon at Safety for Dixon and Davis?
(Also, didn't BP say that Lynn Scott was primarily a Special Teams guy?)
I can't believe that BP wouldn't hedge himself in case there were complications with Woody's injury or simply that Dixon could not cement down the position.
Opinions?
|
Jerruh in the last day or so said nobody was being brought in...take it for what its worth
David
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 14,223 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Woods
interesting that Bill said that every position on the roster has competition this year (or something along those lines), except Safety.
I think he then added that we have some "options" . . . . I am assuming it's with respect to that position.
BP admitted that with Woody that if there was any way for Woody to be ready, that he would be. Woody is that type of competitor. But obviously BP also "suggested" that maybe things with Woody's injury may not work out.
Given all of this, what are the chances of bringing in some competition fairly soon at Safety for Dixon and Davis?
(Also, didn't BP say that Lynn Scott was primarily a Special Teams guy?)
I can't believe that BP wouldn't hedge himself in case there were complications with Woody's injury or simply that Dixon could not cement down the position.
Opinions?
|
I would hope Parcells said that Lynn Scott is ONLY a special teams guy.
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Years Donated 2004, 2009, 2010
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | London, England |
Posts: | 12,309 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dbair1967
Jerruh in the last day or so said nobody was being brought in...take it for what its worth
David
|
Yhea, I remember that.
But I hope that's not the case.
It's odd that the 1 position (according to BP) where we have no new competition is Safety, yet one of our starters at that position as a surgury requiring injury.
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#5
|
|
Arch Defender
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 30,783 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Woods
Yhea, I remember that.
But I hope that's not the case.
It's odd that the 1 position (according to BP) where we have no new competition is Safety, yet one of our starters at that position as a surgury requiring injury.
|
maybe it means they have supreme confidence in somebody here, or maybe they are 100% sure Woodson is going to be fine
either way it doesnt matter, one safety spot isnt critical to this teams success of failure, especially when the one thing we can count on is Roy Williams
David
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#6
|
|
"You Want Some?"
Years Donated 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Olean, New York |
Posts: | 27,302 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dbair1967
maybe it means they have supreme confidence in somebody here, or maybe they are 100% sure Woodson is going to be fine
either way it doesnt matter, one safety spot isnt critical to this teams success of failure, especially when the one thing we can count on is Roy Williams
David
|
Well said David.
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Austin, TX |
Posts: | 17,954 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dbair1967
maybe it means they have supreme confidence in somebody here, or maybe they are 100% sure Woodson is going to be fine
either way it doesnt matter, one safety spot isnt critical to this teams success of failure, especially when the one thing we can count on is Roy Williams
David
|
Maybe because it is what it is. They are just now having to deal with Woodson's injury. There hasn't been a lot of time to bring in a quality vet especially since there aren't many just lying around. With the salary cap and roster limits, you will end up with certain limits on the number of quality players availbable for every position. This year appears to be the defensive backfield.
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 1,908 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dbair1967
Jerruh in the last day or so said nobody was being brought in...take it for what its worth
David
|
We never said that anyone would be brought in, Jerruh... Hmmm..
|
|
|
07-30-2004
|
#9
|
|
Banned
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 3,329 |
|
Roy can't play both S positions...For him and our D to exceed, we need a quality guy to play FS...
Roy needs to attack, at our near ther LOS.
I don't worry about Dixon, he played well last year, but isn't a true FS ether...I hope Davis gets a shot as he has some ball hawking skills the others don't...although short for a S at 5-11ish...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.
|