
|
02-06-2006
|
#1
|
|
That Guy
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 13,219 |
|
Manny Lawson at 18??
Maybe I'm blind or haven't seen enough mock drafts. Lots of people on here are talking about Manny Lawson for us at 18. But I have yet to see him on any mock drafts being taken in the first round. So my question, is he a reach for us at 18?? Obviously we could trade down if he is a reach. Or maybe if you've seen a mock draft where he's taken in the first round, please post.
|
|
|
02-06-2006
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 2,604 |
|
Ware wasn't in the mock first rounds last year either. Lawson is even faster than Ware and is just as good as a pass rusher at the college level. After the combine, he will shoot up the draft boards. With that I would rather take Jon Scott at 18.
|
|
|
02-06-2006
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 230 |
|
Draft projections will change drastically after the combine.
|
|
|
02-06-2006
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | Dayton, OH |
Posts: | 1,843 |
|
If we go OLB at 18, and Carpenter is still on the board, Carpenter is my first pick preference. Well unless somehow AJ Hawk is still available ( I can dream big)
|
|
|
02-06-2006
|
#5
|
|
Shrinkage
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 34,624 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peplaw06
Maybe I'm blind or haven't seen enough mock drafts. Lots of people on here are talking about Manny Lawson for us at 18. But I have yet to see him on any mock drafts being taken in the first round. So my question, is he a reach for us at 18?? Obviously we could trade down if he is a reach. Or maybe if you've seen a mock draft where he's taken in the first round, please post.
|
Only teams that run a 3-4 would probably be most interested. And alot of those teams have different needs.
I would take Carpenter, and if he's there at 18, I might seriously entertain any team interested in trading up.
|
|
|
02-06-2006
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 2,604 |
|
[quote=Cowboy_love_4ever]Only teams that run a 3-4 would probably be most interested. And alot of those teams have different needs.
Not true. He could play DE in the 4-3. He is not that much different than John Abraham who is an elite DE.
|
|
|
02-06-2006
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Dallas, Texas |
Posts: | 2,078 |
|
GBN has him going number 12 to the Browns and with a good combine effort I expect him to go somewhere around there. He is supposed to be a workout warrior and after doing so well in Senior Bowl practices, he will shoot up after the combine.
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#8
|
|
Shrinkage
Years Donated 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Dec 2005 |
Location: | Dallas |
Posts: | 34,624 |
|
[quote=neosapien23]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cowboy_love_4ever
Only teams that run a 3-4 would probably be most interested. And alot of those teams have different needs.
Not true. He could play DE in the 4-3. He is not that much different than John Abraham who is an elite DE.
|
He was invisible in the Senior bowl, he got loose a couple of times, but was not really in the QB's face.
But if you payed attention to Darryl Tapp, he was all over the QB - but he's too slow... I don't understand how he could be in the QB's face all day long and the fast guys rarely got to the QB.
If you move Lawson to olb, he will dominate. I'm torn on Lawson and Carpenter right now. *one more note* If Lawson plays DE in a 4-3, he will be eaten alive in the running game...
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2005 |
Posts: | 230 |
|
[quote=Cowboy_love_4ever]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neosapien23
He was invisible in the Senior bowl, he got loose a couple of times, but was not really in the QB's face.
But if you payed attention to Darryl Tapp, he was all over the QB - but he's too slow... I don't understand how he could be in the QB's face all day long and the fast guys rarely got to the QB.
If you move Lawson to olb, he will dominate. I'm torn on Lawson and Carpenter right now. *one more note* If Lawson plays DE in a 4-3, he will be eaten alive in the running game...
|
Not everyone who has big games in the senior bowl pan out in the NFL, and vice-versa not everyone who has a bad/mediocre game end up as busts.
Remember it is just one game and one game only. If you judge anyone in this draft only on their worst game of the season, none would be 1st rounders.
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#10
|
|
Member
|
My problem with Lawson is this:
Lawson is a liability in run defense. As a strong side OLB in the 3-4, that has to be your forte. Now, Lawson IS a terror on the pass rush, but that is for the WOLB, which is already manned by Ware. If we were to draft Lawson, he would make our pass rush better, but our run defense worse. I think he could improve our team as a whole, but Ware, with his improved skills against the run might have to move to SOLB. I'm not too comfortable with that.
Carpenter is a great choice for SOLB in the 3-4. I'm just afraid he'll be gone by the time we pick. Or he'll be there, and we'll trade down to try to get him later, and someone will snatch him up before he gets to us.
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 2,604 |
|
[quote=Cowboy_love_4ever]
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neosapien23
He was invisible in the Senior bowl, he got loose a couple of times, but was not really in the QB's face.
But if you payed attention to Darryl Tapp, he was all over the QB - but he's too slow... I don't understand how he could be in the QB's face all day long and the fast guys rarely got to the QB.
If you move Lawson to olb, he will dominate. I'm torn on Lawson and Carpenter right now. *one more note* If Lawson plays DE in a 4-3, he will be eaten alive in the running game...
|
I think 18 is too high for a linebacker. We already spent a first on Ware and a 2nd on Burnett. Burnett better get with the program before he becomes labeled as a bust. I would take Scott in the first and Tapp in the 2nd. Wimberely is another intriguing option in the 2nd.
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#12
|
|
I've got moxie
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 9,114 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NewmanFan4
My problem with Lawson is this:
Lawson is a liability in run defense. As a strong side OLB in the 3-4, that has to be your forte. Now, Lawson IS a terror on the pass rush, but that is for the WOLB, which is already manned by Ware. If we were to draft Lawson, he would make our pass rush better, but our run defense worse. I think he could improve our team as a whole, but Ware, with his improved skills against the run might have to move to SOLB. I'm not too comfortable with that.
Carpenter is a great choice for SOLB in the 3-4. I'm just afraid he'll be gone by the time we pick. Or he'll be there, and we'll trade down to try to get him later, and someone will snatch him up before he gets to us.
|
This is my belief as well. Everyone here is trying to convince me that Dallas wants two pass rushing demons on each side.
Looking at BP's history, he is probably more likely to draft an ILB and move him to OLB.
Carpenter is a prototype SOLB in the 3-4 IMO.
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | Schertz, TX |
Posts: | 32,066 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neosapien23
Ware wasn't in the mock first rounds last year either. Lawson is even faster than Ware and is just as good as a pass rusher at the college level. After the combine, he will shoot up the draft boards. With that I would rather take Jon Scott at 18.
|
Are you sure he is faster then Ware? I would like to see that race......if he is faster then Ware.....I say take him.
Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Aug 2005 |
Posts: | 2,604 |
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CrazyCowboy
Are you sure he is faster then Ware? I would like to see that race......if he is faster then Ware.....I say take him.
|
Yes he is faster. He was supposedly clocked at 4.43 forty. I think Ware was somewhere around a 4.56.
|
|
|
02-07-2006
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Posts: | 1,719 |
|
I think I would take Carpenter over Lawson. Carpenter was very productive and his pass rushing skills are under-rated.
We will have to wait til after free agency to see what positions are filled.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.
|