Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Other Forums > Archive Forums > 2006 Archives > 2006 Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

 
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2006   #1
TruBlueCowboy
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,301
Default Agree or disagree: Of 3 big potential LBs, Wimbley seems the best w/linemen?

Maybe some of you folks who watch a lot of college football can help me out but I've been watching a lot of highlight reels of Wimbley, Carpenter and Lawson. It's really hard to tell what kind of players they are when you're only watching 10-15 highlights of multiple seasons, but one thing becomes apparent:

1) Bobby Carpenter usually gets to the QB because of the blitzes and linemen not protecting their gaps. It always looks like his highlight sacks are because he has a clean hole to the QB.

2) Manny Lawson usually gets to the QB because of pressure from the other side. It always looks like his highlight sacks are because the pocket is just straight up collapsing on all sides. (Not to take anything away from him. It's his blinding speed that allows him to get there first.)

3) Kimerion Wimbley seems to get pressure because he just manhandles the linemen in his way. He does have a damn good nose tackle on that team but the highlights I watch always seem to have him taking on linemen one-on-one and winning the battle.

Now I know this is a broad generalization, and if Lawson or Carpenter are playing the linebacker spot in college they may not even be asked to fulfill this role, but from what I've seen, Wimbley really does seem like the guy who would most likely be able to take on linemen in our 3-4.

Am I completely off or do you think Wimbley would be the best candidate for matching up with NFL offensive tackles? If so, if he has the speed to cover (which he claims he does in his interview, says he's even covered receivers before http://dallascowboyszone.com/forums/...d.php?t=54181), I don't see why he shouldn't be the first choice. Decisions, decisions, decisions.....

Last edited by TruBlueCowboy : 04-28-2006 at 12:16 PM.
TruBlueCowboy is offline  

Old 04-28-2006   #2
Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
 
Chocolate Lab's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
1-star thread
Posts:
32,062
Default

I agree with you 100%. It looks to me like Wimbley is much better at getting to the QB by going through the OT compared to the other two. That was the first thing I thought when seeing his highlight clips.

But like you say, I'm mainly going off highlights.

And that's not to put down the other two candidates, Rack and theogt.
Ivy League

Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
Chocolate Lab is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #3
dcboy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
171
Default

I think the same thing and I am also only going by highlights. But from the clips Wimberly is my top realistic lb choice.
dcboy is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #4
cboyd
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
385
Default

You are exactly right my friend, Wimbley does look better in the highlights, and he seems to be a guy that can terroize a defense a lot more than Lawson or Carpentar. I have these OLB's in this order. Wimbley, Lawson, Carpentar.
cboyd is online now  
Old 04-28-2006   #5
jazzcat22
Senior Member
 
jazzcat22's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Euless, TX
Posts:
6,566
Default

Could be just the highlights that are shown of Carpenter, because it looks better in some editor's opinion. I can't go by anything other than highlights of Wimbley and Lawson. But being an Ohio State fan, watch just about all of Carpenter's games. There were many times he fought through blocks, threw guys to the ground, chased down and sacked the QB. Using strength, speed and athleticism to get to his target, QB, RB, TE, WR. Not saying he would be any better than the others, but all his sacks did not come from holes opened by blitzes.
jazzcat22 is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #6
cboyd
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Jul 2005
Posts:
385
Default

It's always good to have opinions from people who have seen the guys play. I do think that highlights help a lot because that is all some of us can go by. Last year I watched highlights and determined DeMarcus Ware was the guy we should get, and see how that turned out so far.
cboyd is online now  
Old 04-28-2006   #7
AdamJT13
Salary Cap Analyst
 
AdamJT13's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
14,759
Default

I agree that Wimbley showed the best pass-rushing skills of the three. What worries me about him, though, would be his ability to drop into coverage. Carpenter has experience doing it, and Lawson (like Ware) has the athletic ability to pick it up quickly. Wimbley doesn't have the experience (he doesn't have a ton of experience anyway), and he doesn't have quite the same athleticism as Lawson. Still, I don't know how much the team will worry about Wimbley's coverage ability, since the run-stopping ability and pass-rushing ability seem to be there.
AdamJT13 is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #8
TruBlueCowboy
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzcat22
Could be just the highlights that are shown of Carpenter, because it looks better in some editor's opinion. I can't go by anything other than highlights of Wimbley and Lawson. But being an Ohio State fan, watch just about all of Carpenter's games. There were many times he fought through blocks, threw guys to the ground, chased down and sacked the QB. Using strength, speed and athleticism to get to his target, QB, RB, TE, WR. Not saying he would be any better than the others, but all his sacks did not come from holes opened by blitzes.
I don't disagree with you at all. Like jazzcat said, it's good to hear from the fans of the college teams. I'm sure he's had success against linemen, I just notice that a lot of his highlight sacks seem to come from circumstances that would mainly only be beneficial in a 4-3 alignment, and also wonder how much he benefits from those other linebackers around him creating problems.
TruBlueCowboy is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #9
MichaelWinicki
"You Want Some?"
 
MichaelWinicki's Avatar
Years Donated
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Olean, New York
Posts:
27,308
Send a message via MSN to MichaelWinicki Send a message via Yahoo to MichaelWinicki
Default

In my own world I would prefer the guy to be good at stopping the run first, be able to cover second and rush the passer third.
MichaelWinicki is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #10
TruBlueCowboy
Senior Member
Years Donated
2005
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
7,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13
I agree that Wimbley showed the best pass-rushing skills of the three. What worries me about him, though, would be his ability to drop into coverage. Carpenter has experience doing it, and Lawson (like Ware) has the athletic ability to pick it up quickly. Wimbley doesn't have the experience (he doesn't have a ton of experience anyway), and he doesn't have quite the same athleticism as Lawson. Still, I don't know how much the team will worry about Wimbley's coverage ability, since the run-stopping ability and pass-rushing ability seem to be there.
I guess what would keep me happy is knowing a healthy Singleton could still get some heavy playing minutes and Parcells could gradually introduce Wimbley as he felt more comfortable with him. If Wimbley has that same success with NFL offensive tackles, boy, just thinking of the damage him and Ware could do together. I imagine Ware's highlight reel next year would look like Lawson's college clips.
TruBlueCowboy is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #11
theogt
Surrealist
 
theogt's Avatar
Years Donated
2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Posts:
43,253
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJT13
I agree that Wimbley showed the best pass-rushing skills of the three. What worries me about him, though, would be his ability to drop into coverage. Carpenter has experience doing it, and Lawson (like Ware) has the athletic ability to pick it up quickly. Wimbley doesn't have the experience (he doesn't have a ton of experience anyway), and he doesn't have quite the same athleticism as Lawson. Still, I don't know how much the team will worry about Wimbley's coverage ability, since the run-stopping ability and pass-rushing ability seem to be there.
Word for word what he said.
theogt is online now  
Old 04-28-2006   #12
CrazyCowboy
Senior Member
 
CrazyCowboy's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Location:
Schertz, TX
Posts:
32,067
Default

My $$$ goes to:

2) Manny Lawson usually gets to the QB because of pressure from the other side. It always looks like his highlight sacks are because the pocket is just straight up collapsing on all sides. (Not to take anything away from him. It's his blinding speed that allows him to get there first.)


Mr. Jones and CrazyCowboy--Training Camp 2004
CrazyCowboy is online now  
Old 04-28-2006   #13
acheman
Senior Member
 
acheman's Avatar
 
Joined:
Aug 2005
Posts:
972
Default

Agree.
Which is why he will not be available at #18.
acheman is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #14
Avery
The Dog that Saved Charleston
 
Avery's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Herriman, UT
Posts:
7,159
Default

Wimbley would be my choice of the three followed by Lawson then Carpenter.
Avery is offline  
Old 04-28-2006   #15
MiStar
Senior Member
 
MiStar's Avatar
 
Joined:
Mar 2005
Posts:
395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acheman
Agree.
Which is why he will not be available at #18.
Ditto. It would take quite a bit of luck for us to get him without trading up.
MiStar is offline  

 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com