Go Back   Dallas Cowboys Forum - CowboysZone.com > Main Forums > Draft Zone

Cowboys Chat: 0 user(s) online


Home  |  Fan Zone  |  News Zone  |  Draft Zone  |  Off-topic Zone  |  Forum Rules  |  Chat  |  ** Change Graphics **

Reply
 
Display Modes Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2007   #1
Avery
The Dog that Saved Charleston
 
Avery's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Herriman, UT
Posts:
7,158
Default ***LIVE - CZ Mock Draft 1.0 Picks***

Hi all!

Below are the results for today's mock draft.

1. Oakland Raiders (Shuttemdown41) - Calvin Johnson, WR, Georgia Tech
2. Detroit Lions (locked&loaded) - Joe Thomas, OT, Wisconsin
3. Cleveland Browns (Avery) - Brady Quinn, QB, Notre Dame
4. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (summerisfunner) - Gaines Adams, DE, Clemson
5. Arizona Cardinals (5mics) - Alan Branch, DT, Michigan
6. Washington Redskins (theogt) - Ted Ginn, WR, Ohio St.
7. Minnesota Vikings (Hostile) - JaMarcus Russell, QB, LSU
8. Houston Texans (jksmith269) - Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma
9. Miami Dolphins (Spontae) - Levi Brown, OT, Penn St.
10. Atlanta Falcons (dallasfaniac) - Laron Landry, FS, LSU
11. San Francisco 49ers (BigDFan5) - Jamaal Anderson, DE, Arkansas
12. Buffalo Bills (JeffPrince) - Leon Hall, CB, Michigan
13. St. Louis Rams (Gollum/Stanley Spadowski) - Amobi Okoye, DT, Louisville
14. Carolina Panthers (brewers47) - Reggie Nelson, FS, Florida
15. Pittsburgh Steelers (peplaw06) - Jarvis Moss, DE, Florida
16. Green Bay Packers (ABQCOWBOY) - Marshawn Lynch, RB, California
17. Jacksonville Jaguars (Letemburn) - Charles Johnson, DE, Georgia
18. Cincinnati Bengals (Dawgs0916) - Darrelle Revis, CB, Pittsburgh
19. Tennessee Titans (Cowboy Junkie) - Dwayne Jarrett, WR, USC
20. New York Giants (iceberg) - Michael Bush, RB, Louisville
21. Denver Broncos (theogt) - Adam Carriker, DE, Nebraska
22. Dallas Cowboys (iceberg) - Justin Blalock, OG, Texas
23. Kansas City Chiefs (BigDFan5) - Joe Staley, OT, Central Michigan
24. New England Patriots *from Seattle* (Rack) - Robert Meachem, WR, Tennessee
25. New York Jets (Hostile) - Ben Grubbs, OG, Auburn
26. Philadelphia Eagles (ABQCOWBOY) - Patrick Willis, MLB, Ole Miss
27. New Orleans Saints (Spontae) - Aaron Ross, CB, Texas
28. New England Patriots (Rack) - Paul Posluszny, LB, Penn St.
29. Baltimore Ravens (Letemburn) - Dwayne Bowe, WR, LSU
30. San Diego Chargers (Gollum/Stanley Spadowski) - Sidney Rice, WR, South Carolina
31. Chicago Bears (locked&loaded) - Chris Houston, CB, Arkansas
32. Indianapolis Colts (5mics) - Lawrence Timmons, OLB, Florida St.

Last edited by Avery : 02-24-2007 at 11:36 AM.
Avery is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 02-24-2007   #2
dallasfaniac
Senior Member
Years Donated
2007, 2009
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
Las Vegas, NV
Posts:
4,197
Default

It was a good time, hopefully the next one goes better. Some of you guys gotta show up or post that you can't take the team. It's was interesting to see what people thought other team needs were more pressing as there were only a couple teams that had a concensus.
dallasfaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #3
superpunk
Senior Member
 
superpunk's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Oct 2005
Location:
South O
Posts:
26,136
Default

Shoot me if we actually pick Blalock, and Bowe and Hughes are on the board.
victory is ours
superpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #4
gollum
Senior Member
 
gollum's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by superpunk View Post
Shoot me if we actually pick Blalock, and Bowe and Hughes are on the board.
iceberg...1
gollum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #5
StanleySpadowski
Senior Member
 
StanleySpadowski's Avatar
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Posts:
4,812
Default

Some of the picks were embarrasingly bad -Washington, the NY Giants and Dallas for example.

I'm prejudiced, but I thought the draft worked out very well for the Patriots and the Chargers.

Other really solid picks were the Colts, Bears, Ravens and Texans.
StanleySpadowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #6
DragonCowboy
Senior Member
 
Joined:
Nov 2005
Location:
Austin, Texas
Posts:
5,271
Default

I actually think that Blalock was an OK pick. Hey, if he can help us with our guard problems, then hell, I'd draft him too.

But as SP said, I'm not sure if I'd take him over Hughes and Bowe.

Blalock is a pretty solid pick IMO, just not given the circumstances I guess.


Thanks YoMick!
DragonCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #7
superpunk
Senior Member
 
superpunk's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Oct 2005
Location:
South O
Posts:
26,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonCowboy View Post
I actually think that Blalock was an OK pick. Hey, if he can help us with our guard problems, then hell, I'd draft him too.

But as SP said, I'm not sure if I'd take him over Hughes and Bowe.

Blalock is a pretty solid pick IMO, just not given the circumstances I guess.
Blalock is probably going to be a fantastic guard - a real mauler. But, for better or for worse, that is not the offensive line that we have been trying to build for the past few years, especially not from the guard position. Is that a huge deal? Noone can say for sure. But if we're moving to a more athletic, less physically imposing line, it doesn't make an enormous amount of sense to draft a guard that is almost entirely the opposite.

I really think our main focus in the first round is going to be getting help at corner or WR. It seems ridiculous, since our most glaring need is RG - but there's just noone who fits. Maybe Blalock's more athletic than I think, and we grab him up.
victory is ours
superpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2007   #8
iceberg
detoxed
 
iceberg's Avatar
Years Donated
2004, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 
Joined:
Apr 2004
Location:
the colony
Posts:
26,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by superpunk View Post
Blalock is probably going to be a fantastic guard - a real mauler. But, for better or for worse, that is not the offensive line that we have been trying to build for the past few years, especially not from the guard position. Is that a huge deal? Noone can say for sure. But if we're moving to a more athletic, less physically imposing line, it doesn't make an enormous amount of sense to draft a guard that is almost entirely the opposite.

I really think our main focus in the first round is going to be getting help at corner or WR. It seems ridiculous, since our most glaring need is RG - but there's just noone who fits. Maybe Blalock's more athletic than I think, and we grab him up.
this is why i hated having the cowboys pick. regardless of who you take, there'll be a crowd who's not on board with it, or thinks something else could be better.

since i've spent years harping on fixing the line, that's where i went. bowe? maybe. but now we have him as our 4th WR on the roster and he's not likely to play too much until glenn gets hurt, crayton washes out, or TO upsets someone and is no longer a cowboy.

for the giants, yea. i reached. i didn't have enough time to get overall team needs and went with the best RB on the board vs. BPA overall. i'll try to take more time to study overall needs next time around for my team assignment. one public ridiculing is enough for me. : )
iceberg
i can’t make a mind see what a heart looks past in hope
iceberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007   #9
superpunk
Senior Member
 
superpunk's Avatar
Years Donated
2007
 
Joined:
Oct 2005
Location:
South O
Posts:
26,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iceberg View Post
this is why i hated having the cowboys pick. regardless of who you take, there'll be a crowd who's not on board with it, or thinks something else could be better.

since i've spent years harping on fixing the line, that's where i went. bowe? maybe. but now we have him as our 4th WR on the roster and he's not likely to play too much until glenn gets hurt, crayton washes out, or TO upsets someone and is no longer a cowboy.

for the giants, yea. i reached. i didn't have enough time to get overall team needs and went with the best RB on the board vs. BPA overall. i'll try to take more time to study overall needs next time around for my team assignment. one public ridiculing is enough for me. : )
Don't be so sensitive. :-P

Blalock's a fine pick, and I won't actually shoot anything if we do pick him. I just think he doesn't really fit what we've been trying to do here. We can probably get the kin of guard we need a little later. But if they see him, and think he's a rare player - yeah, take him. Guys like that can play in any style.
victory is ours
superpunk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2004-2012 CowboysZone.com