'08 Draft- McFadden gone - and your next pick is???

[Cowboys&Caps]

Originally Posted by theogt

Maybe it's all a fakse. Maybe it's CGI taged by NASA at Roswell.

Dude, I know you've got common sense. Just use it.

The NFL does use CGI though, did you think it was a coincidence that Barry Sanders started to shake like his pants were on fire around the mid 90's??

nah man the dot com boom boosted CGI so much they couldn't resist.

[LatinMind]

Originally Posted by J.Jones21

Ok your a Jackson H8R we get that.

now, he is not the tallest or the heaviest but when he runs a 40 at the combine that will all go out the window.

4.25 impresses people that way.

if 40 times meant anything, randal williams would have been 1st overal pick

[BouncingCheese]

Originally Posted by Bizwah

I knew someone would bring this up.

First of all, big difference in being 5-9 185 and being 6-0 166. We're talking 20-25 pounds.

Being so slight enables DBs to easily knock him off his route. Both Smith and Moss are pretty solid builds.

Totally different body shapes we're talking about here.

And yes, he has the frame to carry more weight. But can he without losing his speed? Pinkston had the frame too......did he ever gain the weight?

Not to mention that almost all the players lie about their weight and hieght....

[superpunk]

Problem solved. I used my CSI powers.

[Hoofbite]

any specific reason why " live-strong bracelet = ******"

[Vintage]

Originally Posted by Thehoofbite

any specific reason why " live-strong bracelet = ******"

Joke.

[Hoofbite]

Originally Posted by Vintage

Joke.

hmm...guess it just didn't really seem to funny to me.

different jokes for different folks i suppose.

[ZeroClub]

Originally Posted by LatinMind

if 40 times meant anything, randal williams would have been 1st overal pick

40 times don't mean everything, but they do mean something.

[superpunk]

Originally Posted by Thehoofbite

any specific reason why " live-strong bracelet = ******"

I don't make the rules, bud.

Maybe it's just a watch.

[theogt]

Oh my.

[peplaw06]

Originally Posted by theogt

Maybe it's all a fake. Maybe it's CGI staged by NASA at Roswell.

Dude, I know you've got common sense. Just use it.

Common sense? So you stating that you can tell how tall a guy is from one camera shot is using common sense? And depending on that rather than every single piece of information written on the guy? If common sense is believe what you see on TV despite being told otherwise 99% of the time, then I guess I don't have any.

[peplaw06]

Originally Posted by superpunk

Problem solved. I used my CSI powers.

QFT... Early nomination for post of the month.

[theogt]

Originally Posted by peplaw06

Common sense? So you stating that you can tell how tall a guy is from one camera shot is using common sense? And depending on that rather than every single piece of information written on the guy? If common sense is believe what you see on TV despite being told otherwise 99% of the time, then I guess I don't have any.

I'm just saying, college websites routinely lie about players' sizes. Once a team website puts up measurements, then all the other sites just copy what they have. Teams do this to help their own players. It would help DeSean tremendously if he was 6' instead of 5'9-1/2" (or whatever he is). There were a handful of players this year that were 2-3 inches shorter than their previously listed heights. It happens every year.

Of course we know Randy Moss's real height. He was measured at the Combine. Moss could be standing on a stool. Or DeSean could be walking on his knees in that shot, but common sense tells me that none of those things are likely to be occurring. And it's not camera angle -- they're standing right next to each other. He's just tiny. If you don't have a problem with him being tiny (as you've said before) that's fine. I do.

Maybe his playmaking ability can overcome that. But Parcells told Ireland one very nice piece of advice -- to limit your margin for error.