
|
08-08-2007
|
#46
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champsheart
Long - I like this pick
Baker - not a believer yet, not sure I will be
Campbell - I need to focus on this year, not sure
Dorsey - Like that pick
Cason - Like that pick
The thing is I really want Fire Power on offense out of this draft. I really like both McFadden and Slaton and would love to have one of these guys. The thing about both is they bring a dimension he have not had in years on Offense, and that is the threat as a receiver as well. I would love to see us add a player to this offense that gives that Bush/Faulk dimension. OH MY!
Not sure if we can get either one with our next First rounder. If we are at #2 and who ever is drafting #1 will switch for our other first rounder, at this point I do it to get McFadden. That may be subject to change after next year, but right now I do it.
|
I like the term firepower for this draft.
That is why I want McFadden with the Browns' pick, and the best available WR with our pick.
Someone mentioned Cason with our pick. He won't drop that far unless he gets hurt. Top 10 pick.
In all seriousness, McFadden is the player I absolutely want, and have wanted from the second I heard we got Cleveland's 2008 1st rounder. If it can't happen...oh well.
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#47
|
|
Lonely Stranger
Years Donated 2007, 2009, 2012
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Just passing thr |
Posts: | 22,409 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champsheart
TRUE, he could be a very interesting prospect
|
Um, who really cares.
***
Predicting the future can be very hard, mostly because it hasn’t happened yet."
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#48
|
|
Pro-Quinn
Joined: | Nov 2006 |
Location: | Chillin on da 7t |
Posts: | 4,315 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I like the term firepower for this draft.
That is why I want McFadden with the Browns' pick, and the best available WR with our pick.
Someone mentioned Cason with our pick. He won't drop that far unless he gets hurt. Top 10 pick.
In all seriousness, McFadden is the player I absolutely want, and have wanted from the second I heard we got Cleveland's 2008 1st rounder. If it can't happen...oh well.
|
Agreed... If McFadden is available he is a no brainer.. And a big play WR should be a high priority based on or 33 year old starting WR's
Bye Bradie.....
Jerry... Get a stud.
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#49
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | A Mile High |
Posts: | 2,556 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5Stars
Um, who really cares.
|
Did you hunt for that just to post this, or just run across it and decided to be funny? 
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#50
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | A Mile High |
Posts: | 2,556 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I like the term firepower for this draft.
That is why I want McFadden with the Browns' pick, and the best available WR with our pick.
Someone mentioned Cason with our pick. He won't drop that far unless he gets hurt. Top 10 pick.
In all seriousness, McFadden is the player I absolutely want, and have wanted from the second I heard we got Cleveland's 2008 1st rounder. If it can't happen...oh well.
|

|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#51
|
|
Lonely Stranger
Years Donated 2007, 2009, 2012
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Just passing thr |
Posts: | 22,409 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champsheart
|
What would Deion Sanders say, huh?

***
Predicting the future can be very hard, mostly because it hasn’t happened yet."
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#52
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | A Mile High |
Posts: | 2,556 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5Stars
What would Deion Sanders say, huh?

|

|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#53
|
|
Last of the Duke Street Kings
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | 'neath that gian |
Posts: | 4,162 |
|
I could be a happy camper coming away with Jake Long and Manningham.
Now if you'll excuse me...I must shower.
I feel so dirty.
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#54
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackrussell
I could be a happy camper coming away with Jake Long and Manningham.
Now if you'll excuse me...I must shower.
I feel so dirty.
|
Do you think Manningham would last to the late first? I think he might end up top 15 along with Desean Jackson of Cal.
I'd love to have Long or Baker.
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#55
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | A Mile High |
Posts: | 2,556 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Do you think Manningham would last to the late first? I think he might end up top 15 along with Desean Jackson of Cal.
I'd love to have Long or Baker.
|
That is hard to tell, but you may be right.
Could you imagine getting McFadden and Jackson or Manningham. OH MY! There is my FIREPOWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#56
|
|
Right Kind of Guy
Years Donated 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Posts: | 117,252 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champsheart
That is hard to tell, but you may be right.
Could you imagine getting McFadden and Jackson or Manningham. OH MY! There is my FIREPOWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
I plan to go to the Draft. If we got McFadden and Manningham I'd need a tranquilizer gun to calm me down.
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#57
|
|
Last of the Duke Street Kings
Joined: | Mar 2005 |
Location: | 'neath that gian |
Posts: | 4,162 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
Do you think Manningham would last to the late first? I think he might end up top 15 along with Desean Jackson of Cal.
I'd love to have Long or Baker.
|
Not late 1st...15-20 right now I guess...less someone jumps on him too early(cue Ted Ginn).
I see us at about 25...anything could happen at that point.
At any rate, if we're picking that late...alot of things will have gone right...Romo and JJones in particular. Time to add some new toys on offense to make that final push.
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#58
|
|
Lonely Stranger
Years Donated 2007, 2009, 2012
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Just passing thr |
Posts: | 22,409 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hostile
I plan to go to the Draft. If we got McFadden and Manningham I'd need a tranquilizer gun to calm me down.
|
2nd time going to the draft? Now that is slick! I have been to the HOF but not the draft! At least you will know about those "turnstile" doors now!
(is that redhead girl going to be there? i might need to go along)
 yes...
***
Predicting the future can be very hard, mostly because it hasn’t happened yet."
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#59
|
|
Run-loving Dino
Joined: | Apr 2004 |
Location: | 1-star thread |
Posts: | 32,047 |
|
If we're picking at #2 and not trading down, we'd better not take a WR. I'd want one of the premier positions: Left tackle, defensive tackle, or cornerback... Assuming that we don't need a QB, of course.
Actually, that pick is one that no one really wants. Those picks cost a fortune nowdays, and it's too much to pay for what is a great unknown. That's why no one trades up for them, unless they need a QB.
And as some of the more intelligent posters have already noted  , there's no such thing as a can't-miss pick. Such an animal doesn't exist.
In a really perfect world, we'd trade down a few picks and pick up at least a third and maybe a second. Then I'd feel a lot more comforable drafting a top DT, LT, CB or even RB. Save the WR for the later first rounder.
Ivy League
Jason Garrett offense rank minus Tony Sparano: 18, 14, 7, 15, 15
|
|
|
08-08-2007
|
#60
|
|
Lonely Stranger
Years Donated 2007, 2009, 2012
Joined: | Jan 2006 |
Location: | Just passing thr |
Posts: | 22,409 |
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocolate Lab
If we're picking at #2 and not trading down, we'd better not take a WR. I'd want one of the premier positions: Left tackle, defensive tackle, or cornerback... Assuming that we don't need a QB, of course.
|
Nice! It's good to have draft picks...that's how you build a strong team.

***
Predicting the future can be very hard, mostly because it hasn’t happened yet."
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.
|