Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasfaniac
It's just confusing because he said 'ranking' in the title of his article. He really just gave a listing of the top talent at each position alphabetically.
|
Well, it's low value information. Most of us can read top 100 lists and see that the people he's talking about are on them. A person found on say, 7 of 8 top 100 lists has a great chance of being drafted on the first day, in rounds 1-3. So he's telling us stuff that we already know.
The value in the article are the little blurbs about sleepers here and there.
David.