Originally Posted by dallasfaniac
It's just confusing because he said 'ranking' in the title of his article. He really just gave a listing of the top talent at each position alphabetically.
Well, it's low value information. Most of us can read top 100 lists and see that the people he's talking about are on them. A person found on say, 7 of 8 top 100 lists has a great chance of being drafted on the first day, in rounds 1-3. So he's telling us stuff that we already know.
The value in the article are the little blurbs about sleepers here and there.