Why do people always get their panties in a wad when you draw similarities between current players and former players, no matter how harmless? You would think someone could draw a differentiation between someone saying "Things about him remind me of _______" and "This guy is going to be as good, if not better, than ________"
But, no, sadly not.
For the future, if I say "Tony Romo, like Montana, may be even more accurate rolling out than he is in the pocket", I"m not saying "OMG !! TONY ROMO IS AS GOOD AS M<ONTANAAA !!#*@#!!! HE'S GOING TO WIN 4 SUPERBOWLS !!!"