Originally Posted by Alexander
He was referring to your logic being shot to hell, probably not your entire argument. It's always opinion as to why people like certain players over others and it is just that, opinion. But sometimes the basis of the opinion can be questioned.
He is correct, McCauley is not and was not a cover-2 type cornerback. He is quite aggressive and it was when he lost his aggressive nature after a concussion where his struggles seemed to coincide playing in Pat Hill's predominantly man coverage schemes.
So how exactly did you arrive at the conclusion that you did about the cover-2 is the question.
he never seemed fast to me despite his 40 time, and has good size and is physical, but it was this comment "perfect example of couch scout analyst talking about something he doesnt know. or probably heard that from another board" that I thought was unnessasary.