Originally Posted by AJM1613
Owens is a problem when they are losing.
Kearse isn't injury prone. 16 games out in 5 years.
They lose their third string HB, both starting corners who were out most of last year, and the MVP of the defense, every year for the past 3 years they released their defense MVP (Trotter, Douglas, Emmons). They still had the 7th ranked defense last year and 2nd (I think) in 2002.
Sounds pretty good. I personally think 13-3 and a loss in the Superbowl, to a team that didn't make the playoffs (don't want to say who, risk of sounding like an idiot).
The thing that annoys me the most is these people who think that Duce was our best HB last year, he wasn't nearly as good as Westbrook and he was about even with Buckhalter.
Owens is a problem when he is not getting the ball enough, it is about TO not the team, winning or losing.
You keep saying 16 games in five years, but you leave out that those games occured in the last TWO seasons, I'd call that a player that is in a period of being injury prone.
You guys were RB by committee, you used all 3 equally, but you continually refer to Staley as a 3rd stringer.
You have holes, you went the Washington approach to get that last step, but things are FAR from a given that it will work.