Quote:
Originally Posted by masomenos85
Oh no, I'm not saying anything bad about the article, I've liked reading all of them. I just chuckle every time I see the word anatomy, especially when it's referring to something like the draft, which is all about "measurables". I mean, when you're studying the anatomy of a guy who has performed in the "underwear Olympics"...it just makes me laugh.
As to Mike Thomas, I like him and I think that he'll be a good pro player. I used to have a formula for grading WR prospects and even without crunching the number, I know that he would have graded out highly on my scale. I would have added a flag to the grade because of his height but he has good mass for his size, so I'm not too concerned.
I think that Knox is a better prospect, not by a lot, but I think that Thomas has a better shot of actually panning out, so I like him a bit more.
|
cool and some good thoughts;